Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 320

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions

Van Goor, H.·2007·Colorectal Disease

Abstract

Consequences and complications of postsurgical intra‐abdominal adhesion formation not including small bowel obstruction and secondary infertility are substantial but are under‐exposed in the literature. Inadvertent enterotomy during reopening of the abdomen or subsequent adhesion dissection is a feared complication of surgery after previous laparotomy. The incidence can be as high as 20% in open surgery and between 1% and 100% in laparoscopy depending on the underlying disease. Delayed postoperative detection of enterotomy is a particular feature of laparoscopy associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Adhesions to the ventral abdominal wall are responsible for the majority of trocar injuries. Both trocar injuries and inadvertent enterotomies result in conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy in almost 100% of cases. There is a paucity of data on other organ injury, such as liver laceration or bladder perforation. Dissecting adhesions before executing the planned operation takes on average 20 min, being one‐fifth of the total operating time in patients having had previous open colorectal surgery. There is some evidence that postoperative morbidity and mortality of patients who need adhesiolysis is higher than that of patients with a virgin abdomen. The necessity to dissect adhesions is associated with increased hospital stay. Postsurgical adhesions are considered a main reason for conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy in many types of procedures including laparoscopic colonic resection. Adhesion formation is part of the innate peritoneal defence mechanism in peritonitis. Abscess formation and bleeding, organ injury and fistula formation at ‘on demand’ relaparotomies are well‐known complications after surgery for intra‐abdominal sepsis associated with fibrinous adhesions. The clinical magnitude hereof is poorly researched. Postsurgical adhesions may cause pain as evidenced by pain mapping clinical experiments. Filmy adhesions between movable organs and the peritoneum appear to be worse in terms of generating pain. The high caseload of gynaecological and some colorectal practices suggest an enormous impact of adhesion‐related chronic abdominal and pelvic pain on patient’s wellbeing and socio‐economic costs. The significant risk of inadvertent enterotomy, conversion to laparotomy and trocar injury, and the associated postoperative morbidity and mortality and increased length of hospital stay warrant routine informed consent of adhesiolysis related complications in patients scheduled for abdominal or pelvic reoperation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01358.x

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 48 references

Cited by

See all 320

Metadata

Authors
Van Goor, H.
Venue
Colorectal Disease
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-09-04
Volume
9
Issue
s2
Pages
25-34
ISSN
  • 1462-8910 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1318
OpenAlex
W2103538496
Cited by
320
References
48
FWCI
11.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01358.x
The paper
Van Goor, H. (2007). Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions. Colorectal Disease. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01358.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.