The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Duodenal–Jejunal Exclusion in a Non-obese Animal Model of Type 2 Diabetes: A New Perspective for an Old Disease
Open accessAbstract
In Brief Background: The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and the biliopancreatic diversion effectively induce weight loss and long-term control of type 2 diabetes in morbidly obese individuals. It is unknown whether the control of diabetes is a secondary outcome from the treatment of obesity or a direct result of the duodenal–jejunal exclusion that both operations include. The aim of this study was to investigate whether duodenal–jejunal exclusion can control diabetes independently on resolution of obesity-related abnormalities. Methods: A gastrojejunal bypass (GJB) with preservation of an intact gastric volume was performed in 10- to 12-week-old Goto-Kakizaki rats, a spontaneous nonobese model of type 2 diabetes. Fasting glycemia, oral glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, basal plasma insulin, and glucose-dependent-insulinotropic peptide as well as plasma levels of cholesterol, triglycerides, and free fatty acids were measured. The GJB was challenged against a sham operation, marked food restriction, and medical therapy with rosiglitazone in matched groups of animals. Rats were observed for 36 weeks after surgery. Results: Mean plasma glucose 3 weeks after GJB was 96.3 ± 10.1 mg/dL (preoperative values were 159 ± 47 mg/dL; P = 0.01). GJB strikingly improved glucose tolerance, inducing a greater than 40% reduction of the area under blood glucose concentration curve (P < 0.001). These effects were not seen in the sham-operated animals despite similar operative time, same postoperative food intake rates, and no significant difference in weight gain profile. GJB resulted also in better glycemic control than greater weight loss from food restriction and than rosiglitazone therapy. Conclusions: Results of our study support the hypothesis that the bypass of duodenum and jejunum can directly control type 2 diabetes and not secondarily to weight loss or treatment of obesity. These findings suggest a potential role of the proximal gut in the pathogenesis the disease and put forward the possibility of alternative therapeutic approaches for the management of type 2 diabetes. It is unclear whether the control of type 2 diabetes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and biliopancreatic diversion is a secondary outcome of the treatment of obesity or a direct result of the duodenal-jejunal exclusion that both operations include. We found that the simple bypass of duodenum and jejunum, without gastric restriction, remarkably improves diabetic abnormalities in the Goto-Kakizaki rat, a nonobese animal model of type 2 diabetes. These findings support the hypothesis of a direct antidiabetic effect of the duodenal-jejunal exclusion and suggest a potential role of the proximal bowel in the pathogenesis type 2 diabetes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global and societal implications of the diabetes epidemic
Zimmet, P., Alberti, K. G. M. M., & Shaw, J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/414782a · Cited by 5,883
Pories, W. J., Swanson, M. S., MacDonald, K. G., Long, S. B., Morris, P. G., Brown, B. M., Barakat, H. A., deRamon, R. A., Israel, G., Dolezal, J. M., et al. (1995) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199509000-00011 · Cited by 2,293
Oxidative Stress and Stress-Activated Signaling Pathways: A Unifying Hypothesis of Type 2 Diabetes
Evans, J. L., Goldfine, I. D., Maddux, B. A., & Grodsky, G. M. (2002) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2001-0039 · Cited by 2,232
Weight gain as a risk factor for clinical diabetes mellitus in women
Colditz, G. A., Willett, W. C., Rotnitzky, A., & Manson, J. E. (1995) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-122-7-199504010-00001 · Cited by 2,064
Nauck, M. A., Heimesaat, M. M., Orskov, C., Holst, J. J., Ebert, R., & Creutzfeldt, W. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci116186 · Cited by 1,651
(1992) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/55.2.615s · Cited by 748
Cited by
Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Buchwald, H., Avidor, Y., Braunwald, E., Jensen, M. D., Pories, W., Fahrbach, K., & Schoelles, K. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.292.14.1724 · Cited by 6,800
Mingrone, G., Panunzi, S., De Gaetano, A., Guidone, C., Iaconelli, A., Nanni, G., Castagneto, M., Bornstein, S., & Rubino, F. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00075-6 · Cited by 1,220
Self-citationRubino, F., Nathan, D. M., Eckel, R. H., Schauer, P. R., Alberti, K. G. M. M., Zimmet, P. Z., Del Prato, S., Ji, L., Sadikot, S. M., Herman, W. H., et al. (2016) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc16-0236 · Cited by 1,008
Self-citationRoux, C. W. L., Aylwin, S. J. B., Batterham, R. L., Borg, C. M., Coyle, F., Prasad, V., Shurey, S., Ghatei, M. A., Patel, A. G., & Bloom, S. R. (2006) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000183349.16877.84 · Cited by 985
Enteroendocrine Cells: Chemosensors in the Intestinal Epithelium
Gribble, F. M., & Reimann, F. (2016) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-021115-105439 · Cited by 683
Metadata
- Authors
- Rubino, F., & Marescaux, J.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 239
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044875945
- Cited by
- 617
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 15.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Duodenal–Jejunal Exclusion in a Non-obese Animal Model of Type 2 Diabetes: A New Perspective for an Old Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000102989.54824.fc
- The paper
- Rubino, F., & Marescaux, J. (2004). Effect of Duodenal–Jejunal Exclusion in a Non-obese Animal Model of Type 2 Diabetes: A New Perspective for an Old Disease. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000102989.54824.fc
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.