The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: An Analysis of Clinicopathologic Features and Outcome
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To define the natural history of resected intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) of the pancreas and to identify clinical and pathologic prognostic features. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: IPMN of the pancreas is a recently described pancreatic tumor. Because of a limited number of cases, prognostic factors and the natural history of resected cases have not been well defined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective pancreatic database was reviewed to identify patients with IPMN who were surgically managed. Pathologic re-review of each case was performed, and the clinicopathologic features were examined. Log rank and chi2 analysis were used to identify factors predictive of survival and recurrence. RESULTS: Over a 17-year period, 63 patients were identified. One patient was unresectable, 6 (10%) underwent a total pancreatectomy, and 56 (89%) had a partial pancreatectomy. Invasive carcinoma was present in 30 patients (48%). Transection margins were involved with atypia or carcinoma in 32 patients (51%). The median follow-up for survivors was 38 months. Disease-specific 5- and 10-year survival were 75% and 60%, respectively. Significant predictors of poor outcome included presentation with elevated bilirubin, presence of invasive carcinoma, increasing size and percentage of invasive carcinoma, histologic type of invasive carcinoma, positive lymph nodes, and vascular invasion. The presence of atypia or carcinoma in situ at the ductal resection margin was not associated with a poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, IPMN has a favorable prognosis. Poor outcome in a subset of patients is largely the result of the presence, extent, and type of an invasive component, lymph node metastases, and vascular invasion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas
Tanaka, M., Fernández-del Castillo, C., Adsay, V., Chari, S., Falconi, M., Jang, J.-Y., Kimura, W., Levy, P., Pitman, M. B., Schmidt, C. M., et al. (2012) · Pancreatology · doi:10.1016/j.pan.2012.04.004 · Cited by 2,354
Revisions of international consensus Fukuoka guidelines for the management of IPMN of the pancreas
Tanaka, M., Fernández-del Castillo, C., Kamisawa, T., Jang, J. Y., Levy, P., Ohtsuka, T., Salvia, R., Shimizu, Y., Tada, M., & Wolfgang, C. L. (2017) · Pancreatology · doi:10.1016/j.pan.2017.07.007 · Cited by 1,797
Scheiman, J. M., Hwang, J. H., & Moayyedi, P. (2015) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.01.014 · Cited by 437
Mino-Kenudson, M., Fernández-del Castillo, C., Baba, Y., Valsangkar, N. P., Liss, A. S., Hsu, M., Correa-Gallego, C., Ingkakul, T., Perez Johnston, R., Turner, B. G., et al. (2011) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2010.232272 · Cited by 293
Gaujoux, S., Brennan, M. F., Gonen, M., D’Angelica, M. I., DeMatteo, R., Fong, Y., Schattner, M., DiMaio, C., Janakos, M., Jarnagin, W. R., et al. (2011) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.01.016 · Cited by 224
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- D'Angelica, M., Brennan, M. F., Suriawinata, A. A., Klimstra, D., & Conlon, K. C.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 239
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 400-408
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095138156
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: An Analysis of Clinicopathologic Features and Outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000114132.47816.dd
- The paper
- D'Angelica, M., Brennan, M. F., Suriawinata, A. A., Klimstra, D., & Conlon, K. C. (2004). Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: An Analysis of Clinicopathologic Features and Outcome. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000114132.47816.dd
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.