Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 321

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors for Death Following Gastric Bypass for Treatment of Morbid Obesity

Open access
Fernandez, Adolfo Z., Demaria, Eric J., Tichansky, David S., Kellum, John M., Wolfe, Luke G., Meador, Jill, Sugerman, Harvey J.·2004·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

In Brief Objective: To identify the factors that increase mortality for either open or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Summary Background Data: Perioperative mortality is the most feared outcome of bariatric surgery, reported to occur in between 0.5% and 1.5% of patients. Methods: The bariatric database at Virginia Commonwealth University was queried for patients who had undergone either an open gastric bypass (O-GBP) or a laparoscopic gastric bypass (L-GBP). A multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify factors related to perioperative mortality was performed. Factors examined included age, gender, body mass index, preoperative weight, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea, obesity hypoventilation syndrome, venous stasis ulcers, intestinal leak, small bowel obstruction, and pulmonary embolus. Results: Since 1992, more than 2000 patients had either an O-GBP (n = 1431) or a L-GBP (n = 580). Of the O-GBP, 547 patients had a proximal GBP (P-GBP) and 884 superobese (body mass index > 50 kg/m2) patients had a long-limb GBP (LL-GBP). The differences in patient demographics, complications, and perioperative mortality rates between L-GBP and O-GBP and P-GBP and LL-GBP patients were examined. Overall, the independent risk factors associated with perioperative death included leak, pulmonary embolus, preoperative weight, and hypertension. Conclusions: The risk factors for perioperative death can be separated into patient characteristics and complications. The access method, open versus laparoscopic, was not independently predictive of death, but the operation type, proximal versus long limb, was predictive. The data do not suggest that superobese patients should not undergo surgery, as they are high risk for early death due to their body weight and comorbidities without surgery. Surgery should not be reserved as a desperate last measure for weight loss. The bariatric database at Virginia Commonwealth University was queried for patients who had undergone either an open gastric bypass or a laparoscopic gastric bypass. A multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify factors related to mortality was performed. The independent risk factors associated with death for the overall series included leak, pulmonary embolism, preoperative weight, and hypertension.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.sla.0000124295.41578.ab

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Fernandez, A. Z., Demaria, E. J., Tichansky, D. S., Kellum, J. M., Wolfe, L. G., Meador, J., & Sugerman, H. J.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2004-05
Volume
239
Issue
5
Pages
698-703
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988129966
Cited by
321
References
3
FWCI
29.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.