Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Clinical and Nutritional Comparison of Biliopancreatic Diversion With and Without Duodenal Switch

Open access
Dolan, Kevin, Hatzifotis, Michael, Newbury, Leyanne, Lowe, Nadine, Fielding, George·2004·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

In Brief Objective: To compare biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) without duodenal switch (DS) and with duodenal switch (BPDDS). Background: A reduction of 70% of excess body weight can be achieved after BPD, but there is a risk of malnutrition and diarrhea. This risk may be reduced by pyloric preservation with BPDDS. Methods: BPD was performed until 1999, when BPDDS was introduced, both with a common channel of 50 cm. At their latest clinic visit, patients filled in a questionnaire regarding weight loss, dietary history, gastrointestinal symptoms, obesity-related comorbidity, and medication including dietary supplements and underwent a serum nutritional screen. Results: BPD was performed in 73 patients and BPDDS in 61 patients, with a median preoperative body mass index (BMI) of 44.8 kg/m2 and a median follow-up of 28 months. There were no significant differences between BPD and BPDDS with regards to age, sex, BMI, or morbidity. Median excess weight loss and BMI at 12, 24, and 36 months was 64.1, 71.0, and 72.1% and 33.1, 31.5, and 31.5 kg/m2, respectively; there were no significant differences between BPD and BPDDS. There were no significant differences between BPD and BPDDS with regards to meal size, fat score, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or nutritional parameters. However, 18% of patients were hypoalbuminemic, 32% anemic, 25% hypocalcemic, and almost half had low vitamin A, D, and K levels, despite more than 80% taking vitamin supplementation. Conclusion: DS does not improve weight loss or lessen the gastrointestinal or nutritional side effects of BPD. Biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) was performed in 73 patients without duodenal switch (DS) and 61 patients with duodenal switch (BPDDS). Excess weight loss was 70% after BPD and BPDDS, and there were no significant differences in gastrointestinal symptoms, meal size, or nutritional parameters. Duodenal switch does not improve weight loss or lessen the gastrointestinal or nutritional side effects of BPD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.sla.0000129280.68540.76

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 173

Metadata

Authors
Dolan, K., Hatzifotis, M., Newbury, L., Lowe, N., & Fielding, G.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2004-07
Volume
240
Issue
1
Pages
51-56
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088469237
Cited by
173
References
2
FWCI
8.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Clinical and Nutritional Comparison of Biliopancreatic Diversion With and Without Duodenal Switch. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000129280.68540.76
The paper
Dolan, K., Hatzifotis, M., Newbury, L., Lowe, N., & Fielding, G. (2004). A Clinical and Nutritional Comparison of Biliopancreatic Diversion With and Without Duodenal Switch. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000129280.68540.76

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.