The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Updated Population-Based Review of Carcinoid Tumors
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the population-based incidence, anatomic distribution, and survival rates of gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors. BACKGROUND: Carcinoid tumors arise from neuroendocrine cells and may develop in almost any organ. Many textbooks and articles represent single institution studies and report varying incidence rates, anatomic distribution of tumors, and patient survival rates. Population-based statistics remain largely unknown. METHODS: Data was obtained from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (1973 to 1997). Incidence rates, distribution, and 5-year survival rates were analyzed. Multivariate Cox regression was used to identify predictors of survival using age, race/ethnicity, gender, and tumor characteristics (size, lymph node status, and stage). RESULTS: Of the 11,427 cases analyzed, the average age was 60.9 years, and 54.2% were female. The overall incidence rates for carcinoid tumors have increased significantly over the past 25 years, although rates for some sites have decreased (eg, appendix). The gastrointestinal tract accounted for 54.5% of the tumors. Within the gastrointestinal tract, the small intestine was the most common site (44.7%), followed by the rectum (19.6%), appendix (16.7%), colon (10.6%), and stomach (7.2%). The 5-year survival rates for the most common gastrointestinal sites were stomach (75.1%), small intestine (76.1%), appendix (76.3%), and rectum (87.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Using national, population-based cancer registry data, this study demonstrates that (1) incidence rates for carcinoid tumors have changed, (2) the most common gastrointestinal site is not the appendix (as is often quoted), but the small intestine, followed in frequency by the rectum, and (3) survival rates differ between individual anatomic sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
Cives, M., & Strosberg, J. R. (2018) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21493 · Cited by 586
Niederle, M. B., Hackl, M., Kaserer, K., & Niederle, B. (2010) · Endocrine-Related Cancer · doi:10.1677/erc-10-0152 · Cited by 444
Caplin, M., Sundin, A., Nillson, O., Baum, R. P., Klose, K. J., Kelestimur, F., Plöckinger, U., Papotti, M., Salazar, R., & Pascher, A. (2012) · Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1159/000335594 · Cited by 301
Carcinoid Tumors of the Gastrointestinal Tract: Trends in Incidence in England Since 1971
Ellis, L., Shale, M. J., & Coleman, M. P. (2010) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2010.341 · Cited by 261
Clinical syndromes related to gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms
Boutzios, G., & Kaltsas, G. (2015) · Frontiers of hormone research · doi:10.1159/000382053 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Maggard, M. A., O??Connell, J. B., & Ko, C. Y.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 240
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 117-122
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971863507
- Cited by
- 552
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Updated Population-Based Review of Carcinoid Tumors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000129342.67174.67
- The paper
- Maggard, M. A., O??Connell, J. B., & Ko, C. Y. (2004). Updated Population-Based Review of Carcinoid Tumors. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000129342.67174.67
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.