Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 408

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predictive Factors for Postoperative Pulmonary Complications and Mortality After Esophagectomy for Cancer

Open access
Law, Simon, Wong, Kam-Ho, Kwok, Ka-Fai, Chu, Kent-Man, Wong, John·2004·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at: (1) documenting the evolution of surgical results of esophagectomy in a high-volume center, (2) identifying predictive factors of pulmonary complications and mortality, and (3) examining whether preoperative chemoradiation therapy would complicate postoperative recovery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Pulmonary complications and mortality rate after esophagectomy remain substantial, and factors responsible have not been adequately studied. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is widely used; it is hypothesized that this may lead to adverse postoperative outcome. METHODS: Prospectively collected data were used to analyze outcome in 421 patients with intrathoracic squamous cell esophageal cancer who underwent resection. Logistic regression analyses determined independent predictors of pulmonary complications and death. Two time periods were compared: period I (January 1990 to June 1995) and period II (July 1995 to December 2001). In the later period, neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy was introduced. RESULTS: Transthoracic resections were carried out in 83% of patients. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation was given to 42% of patients in period II. Major pulmonary complications occurred in 15.9%, and were primarily responsible for 55% of hospital deaths. Thirty-day and hospital mortality rates were 1.4% and 4.8%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis identified age, operation duration, and proximal tumor location as risk factors for pulmonary complications, whereas advanced age and higher blood loss were predictive of mortality. Chemoradiation did not lead to worse outcome. When period I and II were compared, hospital mortality rate reduced from 7.8% to 1.1%, P = 0.001, with correspondingly less blood loss (median blood loss was 700 ml (range: 200-2700 (period I) and 450 ml (range: 100-7000) (period II), P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: A 1.1% mortality rate was achieved in the last 6 years of the study period. Preoperative chemoradiation did not result in worse outcome. Reduction in mortality rate correlated with decreased blood loss.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.sla.0000143123.24556.1c

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 408

Metadata

Authors
Law, S., Wong, K.-H., Kwok, K.-F., Chu, K.-M., & Wong, J.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2004-11
Volume
240
Issue
5
Pages
791-800
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020358226
Cited by
408
References
22
FWCI
15.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictive Factors for Postoperative Pulmonary Complications and Mortality After Esophagectomy for Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000143123.24556.1c
The paper
Law, S., Wong, K.-H., Kwok, K.-F., Chu, K.-M., & Wong, J. (2004). Predictive Factors for Postoperative Pulmonary Complications and Mortality After Esophagectomy for Cancer. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000143123.24556.1c

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.