Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 367

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Histomorphologic Tumor Regression and Lymph Node Metastases Determine Prognosis Following Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: Implications for Response Classification

Open access
Schneider, Paul M., Baldus, Stephan E., Metzger, Ralf, Kocher, Martin, Bongartz, Rudolf, Bollschweiler, Elfriede, Schaefer, Hartmut, Thiele, Juergen, Dienes, Hans P., Mueller, Rolf P., Hoelscher, Arnulf H.·2005·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

In Brief Objective: We sought to quantitatively and objectively evaluate histomorphologic tumor regression and establish a relevant prognostic regression classification system for esophageal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Patients and Methods: Eighty-five consecutive patients with localized esophageal cancers (cT2-4, Nx, M0) received standardized neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, 36 Gy). Seventy-four (87%) patients were resected by transthoracic en bloc esophagectomy and 2-field lymphadenectomy. The entire tumor beds of the resected specimens were evaluated histomorphologically, and regression was categorized into grades I to IV based on the percentage of vital residual tumor cells (VRTCs). A major response was achieved when specimens contained either less than 10% VRTCs (grade III) or a pathologic complete remission (grade IV). Results: Complete resections (R0) were performed in 66 of 74 (89%) patients with 3-year survival rates of 54% ± 7.05% for R0-resected cases and 0% for patients with incomplete resections ortumor progression during neoadjuvant therapy (P < 0.01). Minor histopathologic response was present in 44 (59.5%) and major histopathologic response in 30 (40.5%) tumors. Significantly different 3-year survival rates (38.8% ± 8.1% for minor versus 70.7 ± 10.1% for major response) were observed. Univariate survival analysis identified histomorphologic tumor regression (P < 0.004) and lymph node category (P < 0.01) as significant prognostic factors. Pathologic T category (P < 0.08), histologic type (P = 0.15), or grading (P = 0.33) had no significant impact on survival. Cox regression analysis identified dichotomized regression grades (minor and major histomorphologic regression, P < 0.028) and lymph node status (ypN0 and ypN1, P < 0.036) as significant independent prognostic parameters. A 2-parameter regression classification system that includes histomorphologic regression (major versus minor) and nodal status (ypN0 versus ypN1) was established (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Histomorphologic tumor regression and lymph node status (ypN) were significant prognostic parameters for patients with complete resections (R0) following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer. A regression classification based on 2 parameters could lead to improved objective evaluation of the effectiveness of treatment protocols, accuracy of staging and restaging modalities, and molecular response prediction. The prognostic impact of histomorphologic tumor regression and other variables (pathologic T- and N categories, histologic type, grading) was evaluated within a prospective observation trial in 85 patients with localized esophageal cancers (cT2-4, Nx, M0) receiving neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by surgical resection. A Cox regression model indicated that histomorphologic regression and lymph node status were independent prognostic factors. These results support a simple 2-parameter regression classification system (log-rank, P < 0.001).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.sla.0000186170.38348.7b

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 367

Metadata

Authors
Schneider, P. M., Baldus, S. E., Metzger, R., Kocher, M., Bongartz, R., Bollschweiler, E., Schaefer, H., Thiele, J., Dienes, H. P., Mueller, R. P., & Hoelscher, A. H.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2005-11
Volume
242
Issue
5
Pages
684-692
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026613554
Cited by
367
References
1
FWCI
10.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Histomorphologic Tumor Regression and Lymph Node Metastases Determine Prognosis Following Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: Implications for Response Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000186170.38348.7b
The paper
Schneider, P. M., Baldus, S. E., Metzger, R., Kocher, M., Bongartz, R., Bollschweiler, E., Schaefer, H., Thiele, J., Dienes, H. P., Mueller, R. P., & Hoelscher, A. H. (2005). Histomorphologic Tumor Regression and Lymph Node Metastases Determine Prognosis Following Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: Implications for Response Classification. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000186170.38348.7b

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.