The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epidemiology Data on 108 MEN 1 Patients From the GTE With Isolated Nonfunctioning Tumors of the Pancreas
Open accessAbstract
In Brief Objective: To analyze the penetrance and clinical course of isolated nonfunctioning tumors of the pancreas (NFTP) in MEN 1 patients, and to propose a strategy for managing them. Summary Background Data: Pancreaticoduodenal tumors develop in a majority of MEN 1 patients and are a major cause of death. The natural history of NFTP is poorly defined, and no clear-cut guidelines have been widely accepted regarding treatment. Methods: Data on 108 patients with isolated NFTP among 579 MEN 1 patients from the French Endocrine Tumor Study Group (GTE) were analyzed. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The penetrance of NFTP was 34% at age 50, making it the most frequent pancreaticoduodenal tumor in MEN 1 patients. Forty-three patients (40%) underwent surgery, 32 of them curatively. No patient died because of surgery. Average life expectancy for patients with NFTP was shorter than that for MEN 1 patients who did not have pancreaticoduodenal tumors. Thirteen patients died during follow-up, 10 due to NFTP. Tumor size was correlated with the risks of metastasis and death. These risks were low for patients with tumors ≤20 mm. Conclusions: NFTP are currently the most common tumors of the pancreaticoduodenal region in patients with MEN 1. Prevention of tumor spread by surgery should be balanced with potential operative mortality and morbidity. We do not recommend routine surgery for NFTP ≤20 mm. Nonfunctioning tumors of the pancreas (NFTP) are currently the most frequent pancreaticoduodenal tumors in MEN 1 patients. Among the 108 patients with NFTP in this study, 10 patients died from NFTP. A significant correlation between tumor size, metastasis, and reduced survival was demonstrated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gibril, F., Schumann, M., Pace, A., & Jensen, R. T. (2004) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.md.0000112297.72510.32 · Cited by 313
Cited by
Falconi, M., Bartsch, D. K., Eriksson, B., Klöppel, G., Lopes, J. M., O'Connor, J. M., Salazar, R., Taal, B. G., Vullierme, M. P., & O'Toole, D. (2012) · Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1159/000335587 · Cited by 526
Jensen, R. T., Berna, M. J., Bingham, D. B., & Norton, J. A. (2008) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.23648 · Cited by 488
Tumor size correlates with malignancy in nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumor
Bettini, R., Partelli, S., Boninsegna, L., Capelli, P., Crippa, S., Pederzoli, P., Scarpa, A., & Falconi, M. (2011) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2011.02.022 · Cited by 358
Well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: from genetics to therapy
de Wilde, R. F., Edil, B. H., Hruban, R. H., & Maitra, A. (2012) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2012.9 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Triponez, F., Dosseh, D., Goudet, P., Cougard, P., Bauters, C., Murat, A., Cadiot, G., Niccoli-Sire, P., Chayvialle, J.-A., Calender, A., & Proye, C. A. G.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 243
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 265-272
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993889175
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology Data on 108 MEN 1 Patients From the GTE With Isolated Nonfunctioning Tumors of the Pancreas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000197715.96762.68
- The paper
- Triponez, F., Dosseh, D., Goudet, P., Cougard, P., Bauters, C., Murat, A., Cadiot, G., Niccoli-Sire, P., Chayvialle, J.-A., Calender, A., & Proye, C. A. G. (2006). Epidemiology Data on 108 MEN 1 Patients From the GTE With Isolated Nonfunctioning Tumors of the Pancreas. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000197715.96762.68
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.