Cited by 122Neuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases

Well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: from genetics to therapy

Open access
de Wilde, Roeland F., Edil, Barish H., Hruban, Ralph H., Maitra, Anirban·2012·Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Abstract

Well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) comprise ∼1-3% of pancreatic neoplasms. Although long considered as reasonably benign lesions, PanNETs have considerable malignant potential, with a 5-year survival of ∼65% and a 10-year survival of 45% for resected lesions. As PanNETs have a low incidence, they have been understudied, with few advances made until the completion of their exomic sequencing in the past year. In this Review, we summarize some of the latest insights into the genetics of PanNETs, and their probable implications in the context of prognosis and therapy. In particular, we discuss two genes (DAXX and ATRX) that have collectively been identified as mutated in >40% of PanNETs, and the biological and prognostic implications of these novel mutations. The identification of recurrent somatic mutations within the mTOR signaling pathway and the therapeutic implications for personalized therapy in patients with PanNETs are also discussed. Finally, this Review outlines state-of-the-art advances in the biology of PanNETs that are of emerging translational importance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.9

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PDAC accounts for more than 90% of pancreas cancers and has a distinct molecular profile and natural history from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

    “PDAC accounts for greater than 90% of pancreas cancers and has a distinct molecular profile and natural history from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors”

    From Pancreatic cancer: Advances and challenges (2023) · cites this paper as [22]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Wilde, R. F., Edil, B. H., Hruban, R. H., & Maitra, A.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Maitra, Anirban
Venue
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Published
2012-02-07
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
199-208
ISSN
  • 1759-5045 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-5053
OpenAlex
W2033808368
Cited by
122
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Caring for Carcinoid Foundation
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA006973)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
Keywords
pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, DAXX, ATRX, mTOR signaling, somatic mutations, mutation analysis, personalized treatment, targeted therapy, prognosis, cancer genetics, clinicopathological features
MeSH terms
Genetic Testing, Humans, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Pharmacogenetics, Neuroendocrine Tumors, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review