Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,432

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Percutaneous Local Ablative Therapy and Partial Hepatectomy for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Chen, Min-Shan, Li, Jin-Qing, Zheng, Yun, Guo, Rong-Ping, Liang, Hui-Hong, Zhang, Ya-Qi, Lin, Xiao-Jun, Lau, Wan Y.·2006·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

In Brief Objective: To compare the results of percutaneous local ablative therapy (PLAT) with surgical resection in the treatment of solitary and small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Summary Background Data: PLAT is effective in small HCC. Whether it is as effective as surgical resection in the long-term survivals remains unknown. Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized trial on 180 patients with a solitary HCC ≦5 cm to receive either PLAT or surgical resection. The patients were regularly followed up after treatment with physical examination, blood, and radiologic tests. Results: Of the 90 patients who were randomized to PLAT, only 71 received PLAT because 19 withdrew their consent. Of the 90 patients who were randomized to surgical resection, a single Couinaud liver segment resection was carried out in 69 patients, 2 segments in 16 patients, and 3 or more segments in 3 patients. Ethanol injection was given during open surgery in 2 patients. Only 1 patient died after surgical resection within the same hospital admission. Posttreatment complications were more often and severe after surgery than PLAT. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year overall survival rates after PLAT and surgery were 95.8%, 82.1%, 71.4%, 67.9% and 93.3%, 82.3%, 73.4%, 64.0%, respectively. The corresponding disease-free survival rates were 85.9%, 69.3%, 64.1%, 46.4% and 86.6%, 76.8%, 69%, 51.6%, respectively. Statistically, there was no difference between these 2 treatments. Conclusion: PLAT was as effective as surgical resection in the treatment of solitary and small HCC. PLAT had the advantage over surgical resection in being less invasive. A prospective randomized trial on 180 patients with a solitary hepatocellular carcinoma ≦ 5 cm showed there was no significant difference in the long-term overall and disease-free survivals between treatment with percutaneous local ablative therapy or partial hepatectomy. Percutaneous local ablative therapy has the advantage over surgery in being less invasive.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.sla.0000201480.65519.b8

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,432

Metadata

Authors
Chen, M.-S., Li, J.-Q., Zheng, Y., Guo, R.-P., Liang, H.-H., Zhang, Y.-Q., Lin, X.-J., & Lau, W. Y.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2006-03
Volume
243
Issue
3
Pages
321-328
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132449054
Cited by
1,432
References
0
FWCI
42.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Percutaneous Local Ablative Therapy and Partial Hepatectomy for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000201480.65519.b8
The paper
Chen, M.-S., Li, J.-Q., Zheng, Y., Guo, R.-P., Liang, H.-H., Zhang, Y.-Q., Lin, X.-J., & Lau, W. Y. (2006). A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Percutaneous Local Ablative Therapy and Partial Hepatectomy for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000201480.65519.b8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.