The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biliary Reconstruction in Right Lobe Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: Comparison of Different Techniques in 321 Recipients
Abstract
In Brief Objective: To assess the incidence of biliary complications after right lobe living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in patients undergoing duct-to-duct choledochocholedochostomy or Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy reconstruction. Summary Background Data: Biliary tract complications remain one of the most serious morbidities following liver transplantation. No large series has yet been carried out to compare the 2 techniques in LDLT. This study undertook a retrospective assessment of the relation between the method of biliary reconstruction used and the complications reported. Methods: Between February 1998 and June 2004, 321 patients received right lobe LDLT. Biliary reconstruction was achieved with Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy in 121 patients, duct-to-duct choledochocholedochostomy in 192 patients, and combined Roux-en-Y and duct-to-duct choledochocholedochostomy in 8 patients. The number of graft bile duct and anastomosis, mode of anastomosis, use of stent tube, and management of biliary complications were analyzed. Results: The overall incidence of biliary complications was 24.0%. Univariate analysis revealed that hepatic artery complications, cytomegalovirus infections, and blood type incompatibility were significant risk factors for biliary complications. The respective incidence of biliary leakage and stricture were 12.4% and 8.3% for Roux-en-Y, and 4.7% and 26.6% for duct-to-duct reconstruction. Duct-to-duct choledochocholedochostomy showed a significantly lower incidence of leakage and a higher incidence of stricture; however, 74.5% of the stricture was managed with endoscopic treatment. Conclusions: The authors found an increase in the biliary stricture rate in the duct-to-duct choledochocholedochostomy group. Because of greater physiologic bilioenteric continuity, less incidence of leakage, and easy endoscopic access, duct-to-duct reconstruction represents a feasible technique in right lobe LDLT. To assess the incidence of biliary complications after right lobe living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in patients undergoing duct-to-duct choledochocholedochostomy or Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy reconstruction. Duct-to-duct choledochocholedochostomy showed a significantly lower incidence of leakage and a higher incidence of stricture; however, most of the stricture was managed with endoscopic treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Malinchoc, M., Kamath, P. S., Gordon, F. D., Peine, C. J., Rank, J., & ter Borg, P. C. J. (2000) · Hepatology · doi:10.1053/he.2000.5852 · Cited by 2,893
Cited by
Biliary strictures following liver transplantation: Past, present and preventive strategies
Sharma, S., Gurakar, A., & Jabbour, N. (2008) · Liver Transplantation · doi:10.1002/lt.21509 · Cited by 377
Akamatsu, N., Sugawara, Y., & Hashimoto, D. (2011) · Transplant International · doi:10.1111/j.1432-2277.2010.01202.x · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Kasahara, M., Egawa, H., Takada, Y., Oike, F., Sakamoto, S., Kiuchi, T., Yazumi, S., Shibata, T., & Tanaka, K.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 243
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 559-566
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038625445
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biliary Reconstruction in Right Lobe Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: Comparison of Different Techniques in 321 Recipients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000206419.65678.2e
- The paper
- Kasahara, M., Egawa, H., Takada, Y., Oike, F., Sakamoto, S., Kiuchi, T., Yazumi, S., Shibata, T., & Tanaka, K. (2006). Biliary Reconstruction in Right Lobe Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: Comparison of Different Techniques in 321 Recipients. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000206419.65678.2e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.