Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 411

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hepatic Resection for Noncolorectal Nonendocrine Liver Metastases: Analysis of 1452 Patients and Development of a Prognostic Model

Open access
Adam, Ren??, Chiche, Laurence, Aloia, Thomas, Elias, Dominique, Salmon, R??my, Rivoire, Michel, Jaeck, Daniel, Saric, Jean, Treut, Yves Patrice Le, Belghiti, Jacques, Mantion, Georges, Mentha, Gilles·2006·Transactions of the ... Meeting of the American Surgical Association

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of hepatic resection (HR) in the treatment of patients with noncolorectal nonendocrine liver metastases (NCNELM). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The place of HR in the treatment of NCNELM remains controversial, primarily due to the limitations of previously published reports and the heterogeneity of primary tumor sites and histologies. METHODS: A multivariate risk model was developed by analyzing prognostic factors and long-term outcomes in 1452 patients with NCNELM treated with HR at 41 centers from 1983 to 2004. RESULTS: Hepatic metastases were solitary in 56% and unilateral in 71% (mean diameter, 50.5 mm). Extrahepatic metastases were present in 22%. The most common primary sites were breast (32%), gastrointestinal (16%), and urologic (14%). The most common histologies were adenocarcinoma (60%), GIST/sarcoma (13.5%), and melanoma (13%). R0 resection was achieved in 83% of patients with a 60-day mortality rate of 2.3% and a major complication rate of 21.5%. Tumor recurred in 67% of patients (liver, 24%; extrahepatic, 18%; both, 25%). Overall and disease-free survivals at 5 years were 36% and 21% and at 10 years were 23% and 15%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with poor prognosis were patient age >60 years, nonbreast origin, melanoma or squamous histology, disease-free interval <12 months, extrahepatic metastases, R2 resection, and major hepatectomy (all P < or = 0.02). A prognostic model based on these factors effectively stratified patients into low-risk (0-3 points, 46% 5-year survival), mid-risk (4-6 points, 33% 5-year survival), and high-risk (>6 points, <10% 5-year survival) groups (P = 0.0001). DISCUSSION: HR for NCNELM is safe and effective, with outcomes mainly dependent on primary tumor site and histology. For individual patients, a statistical model based on key prognostic factors could validate the indication for hepatic resection by predicting long-term survivals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.sla.0000239036.46827.5f

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Adam, R., Chiche, L., Aloia, T., Elias, D., Salmon, R., Rivoire, M., Jaeck, D., Saric, J., Treut, Y. P. L., Belghiti, J., Mantion, G., & Mentha, G.
Venue
Transactions of the ... Meeting of the American Surgical Association
Published
2006
Volume
124
Issue
4
Pages
189-200
ISSN
0066-0833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010040021
Cited by
411
References
10
FWCI
9.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hepatic Resection for Noncolorectal Nonendocrine Liver Metastases: Analysis of 1452 Patients and Development of a Prognostic Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000239036.46827.5f
The paper
Adam, R., Chiche, L., Aloia, T., Elias, D., Salmon, R., Rivoire, M., Jaeck, D., Saric, J., Treut, Y. P. L., Belghiti, J., Mantion, G., & Mentha, G. (2006). Hepatic Resection for Noncolorectal Nonendocrine Liver Metastases: Analysis of 1452 Patients and Development of a Prognostic Model. Transactions of the ... Meeting of the American Surgical Association. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000239036.46827.5f

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.