Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 660

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hepatogastroenterology

·2011·Hepatogastroenterology

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The current recommendation of ribavirin dose for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C is based on study results of Western patients, and might not be optimal for Korean patients because of different body frames. METHODOLOGY: A total of 163 treatment-naive genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C patients who received combination therapy with pegylated interferon a-2a and ribavirin were reviewed. RESULTS: Under current ribavirin dosing, only 49% of patients started therapy with ribavirin dose of 13-15mg/kg (targeted dose), while 45% and 6% of patients started therapy with ribavirin dose =16mg/kg and <13mg/kg, respectively. Patients who started therapy with higher ribavirin dose experienced more ribavirin dose modification during treatment (55%, 31% and 11% for ribavirin dose of =16mg/kg, 13-15mg/kg and <13mg/kg, respectively, p=0.002). The sustained virological response (SVR) rate was 66%, 63% and 56% for ribavirin dose of =16mg/kg, 13-15mg/kg and <13mg/kg, respectively (p=0.775). CONCLUSIONS: A certain proportion of Korean patients started therapy with a higher than targeted ribavirin dose, which resulted in more ribavirin dose modifications without definite additional benefit in achieving SVR. Therefore, the ribavirin dosing regimen might need to be reassessed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5754/hge11387

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 660

Metadata

Venue
Hepatogastroenterology
Published
2011-09-27
Volume
59
Issue
113
Pages
1-6
ISSN
0172-6390 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2415257785
Cited by
660
References
0
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hepatogastroenterology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5754/hge11387
The paper
Hepatogastroenterology. (2011). Hepatogastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.5754/hge11387

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.