The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Duodenal Switch Provides Superior Weight Loss in the Super-Obese (BMI ???50kg/m2) Compared With Gastric Bypass
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: Although weight loss following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is acceptable in patients with preoperative body mass index (BMI) between 35 and 50 kg/m, results from several series demonstrate that failure rates approach 40% when BMI is > or =50 kg/m. Here we report the first large single institution series directly comparing weight-loss outcomes in super-obese patients following biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (DS) and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB). METHODS: All super-obese patients (BMI > or =50 kg/m) undergoing standardized laparoscopic and open DS and RYGB between August 2002 and October 2005 were identified from a prospective database. Two-sample t tests were used to compare weight loss, decrease in BMI, and percentage of excess body weight loss (% EBWL) after surgery. chi analysis was used to determine the rate of successful weight loss, defined as achieving at least 50% loss of excess body weight. RESULTS: A total of 350 super-obese patients underwent DS (n = 198) or RYGB (n = 152) with equal 30-day mortality (DS,1 of 198; RYGB, 0 of 152; P = not significant). The % EBWL at follow-up was greater for DS than RY (12 months, 64.1% vs. 55.9%; 18 months, 71. 9% vs. 62.8%; 24 months, 71.6% vs. 60.1%; 36 months, 68.9% vs. 54.9%; P < 0.05). Total weight loss and decrease in BMI were also statistically greater for the DS (data not shown). Importantly, the likelihood of successful weight loss (EBWL >50%) was significantly greater in patients following DS (12 months, 83.9% vs. 70.4%; 18 months, 90.3% vs. 75.9%; 36 months, 84.2% vs. 59.3%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Direct comparison of DS to RYGB demonstrates superior weight loss outcomes for DS.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is no consensus concerning the best procedure for individuals with especially high BMI, but the efficacy and safety of MBS have been demonstrated in this population [86, 87].”
Citations
Cites
Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity in the United States, 1999-2004
Ogden, C. L., Carroll, M. D., Curtin, L. R., McDowell, M. A., Tabak, C. J., & Flegal, K. M. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.13.1549 · Cited by 8,720
Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Buchwald, H., Avidor, Y., Braunwald, E., Jensen, M. D., Pories, W., Fahrbach, K., & Schoelles, K. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.292.14.1724 · Cited by 6,800
Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000
Flegal, K. M. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.14.1723 · Cited by 6,190
Gastrointestinal Surgery for Severe Obesity
Panel, C. D. C. (1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-115-12-956 · Cited by 2,163
Meta-Analysis: Surgical Treatment of Obesity
Maggard, M. A., Shugarman, L. R., Suttorp, M. J., Maglione, M., Sugerman, H. J., Livingston, E. H., Nguyen, N. T., Li, Z., Mojica, W., Hilton, L. G., et al. (2005) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-142-7-200504050-00013 · Cited by 1,567
Outcomes After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity
Schauer, P. R., Ikramuddin, S., GOURASH, W. F., Ramanathan, R. K., & Luketich, J. D. (2000) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200010000-00007 · Cited by 1,328
Biliopancreatic Diversion with a Duodenal Switch
Hess, D. S., & Hess, D. W. (1998) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1381/096089298765554476 · Cited by 1,040
Trends in Bariatric Surgical Procedures
Santry, H. P. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.15.1909 · Cited by 947
Bariatric Surgery Worldwide 2003
Buchwald, H., & Williams, S. E. (2004) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1381/0960892042387057 · Cited by 731
Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch
Marceau, P., Hould, F.-S., Simard, S., Lebel, S., Bourque, R. A., Potvin, M., & Biron, S. (1998) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s002689900498 · Cited by 649
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Buchwald, 2004, JAMA, 292, 1724, 10.1001/jama.292.14.1724 · DOI · Paper page
- 1991, Ann Intern Med, 115, 956, 10.7326/0003-4819-115-12-956 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Eisenberg, D., Shikora, S. A., Aarts, E., Aminian, A., Angrisani, L., Cohen, R. V., De Luca, M., Faria, S. L., Goodpaster, K. P. S., Haddad, A., et al. (2022) · Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.soard.2022.08.013 · Cited by 985
Weight Gain After Short- and Long-Limb Gastric Bypass in Patients Followed for Longer Than 10 Years
Christou, N. V., Look, D., & MacLean, L. D. (2006) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000217592.04061.d5 · Cited by 727
Eisenberg, D., Shikora, S. A., Aarts, E., Aminian, A., Angrisani, L., Cohen, R. V., de Luca, M., Faria, S. L., Goodpaster, K. P. S., Haddad, A., et al. (2023) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11695-022-06332-1 · Cited by 768
“There is no consensus concerning the best procedure for individuals with especially high BMI, but the efficacy and safety of MBS have been demonstrated in this population [86, 87].”
BackgroundHeber, D., Greenway, F. L., Kaplan, L. M., Livingston, E., Salvador, J., & Still, C. (2010) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2009-2128 · Cited by 521
Vitamin status after bariatric surgery: a randomized study of gastric bypass and duodenal switch
Aasheim, E. T., Björkman, S., Søvik, T. T., Engström, M., Hanvold, S. E., Mala, T., Olbers, T., & Bøhmer, T. (2009) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.27583 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Prachand, V. N., DaVee, R. T., & Alverdy, J. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- ORCID
- Alverdy, John C.
- Venue
- Transactions of the ... Meeting of the American Surgical Association
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 276-284
- ISSN
- 0066-0833 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC1856567
- OpenAlex
- W2043071325
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 15.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Transactions of the Meeting of the American Surgical Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
- Keywords
- Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, super obesity, bariatric surgery, weight loss outcomes, excess weight loss, body mass index, biliopancreatic diversion, surgical failure rate
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Duodenum, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Retrospective Studies, Gastric Bypass, Weight Loss, Biliopancreatic Diversion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review