Cited by 2,163Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesMinimally Invasive Surgical TechniquesPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Gastrointestinal Surgery for Severe Obesity

Consensus Development Conference Panel·1991·Annals of Internal Medicine

Abstract

The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Gastrointestinal Surgery for Severe Obesity brought together surgeons, gastroenterologists, endocrinologists, psychiatrists, nutritionists, and other health care professionals as well as the public to address: the nonsurgical treatment options for severe obesity, the surgical treatments for severe obesity and the criteria for selection, the efficacy and risks of surgical treatments for severe obesity, and the need for future research on and epidemiological evaluation of these therapies. Following 2 days of presentations by experts and discussion by the audience, a consensus panel weighed the evidence and prepared their consensus statement. Among their findings, the panel recommended that (1) patients seeking therapy for severe obesity for the first time should be considered for treatment in a nonsurgical program with integrated components of a dietary regimen, appropriate exercise, and behavioral modification and support, (2) gastric restrictive or bypass procedures could be considered for well-informed and motivated patients with acceptable operative risks, (3) patients who are candidates for surgical procedures should be selected carefully after evaluation by a multidisciplinary team with medical, surgical, psychiatric, and nutritional expertise, (4) the operation be performed by a surgeon substantially experienced with the appropriate procedures and working in a clinical setting with adequate support for all aspects of management and assessment, and (5) lifelong medical surveillance after surgical therapy is a necessity. The full text of the consensus panel's statement follows.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7326/0003-4819-115-12-956

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Panel, C. D. C.
Corresponding author
Consensus Development Conference Panel
Venue
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
1991-12-15
Volume
115
Issue
12
Pages
956-961
ISSN
  • 0003-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-3704
OpenAlex
W2608243249
Cited by
2,163
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 89 · 2015: 119 · 2014: 125 · 2013: 115 · 2012: 121
FWCI
6.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
morbid obesity, bariatric surgery, gastric bypass, behavior change, consensus statement
MeSH terms
Humans, Intestines, Obesity, Morbid, Risk Factors, Stomach

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review