The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-expanding Metallic Stents for Relieving Malignant Colorectal Obstruction: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
In Brief Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) placement for the relief of malignant colorectal obstruction in comparison to surgical procedures through a systematic review of the literature. Summary Background Data: Conventional therapies for relieving colorectal obstructions caused by cancer have high rates of morbidity and mortality, particularly when performed under emergency conditions, and palliative procedures resulting in colostomy creation can be a burden for patients and caregivers. Methods: A systematic search strategy was used to retrieve relevant studies. Inclusion of papers was established through application of a predetermined protocol, independent assessment by 2 reviewers, and a final consensus decision. Eighty-eight articles, 15 of which were comparative, formed the evidence base for this review. Results: Little high-level evidence was available. However, the data suggested that SEMS placement was safe and effective in overcoming left-sided malignant colorectal obstructions, regardless of the indication for stent placement or the etiology of the obstruction. Additionally, SEMS placement had positive outcomes when compared with surgery, including overall shorter hospital stays, and a lower rate of serious adverse events. Postoperative mortality appeared comparable between the 2 interventions. Combining SEMS placement with elective surgery also appeared safer and more effective than emergency surgery, with higher rates of primary anastomosis, lower rates of colostomy, shorter hospital stays, and lower overall complication rates. Conclusions: Stenting appears to be a safe and effective addition to the armamentarium of treatment options for colorectal obstructions. However, the small sample sizes of the included studies limited the validity of the findings of this review. The results of additional comparative studies currently being undertaken will add to the certainty of the conclusions that can be drawn. This article reviews the safety and efficacy of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS)for the treatment of malignant colorectal obstruction, both as a stand-alone procedure and in comparison to surgical procedures. Results from the included studies indicate that SEMS are safe and effective and suggest advantages for SEMS over surgery. However, more evidence of a higher quality is required before definitive conclusions can be reached.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04337-3 · Cited by 5,373
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-1-2 · Cited by 2,755
Cited by
Tan, C. J., Dasari, B. V. M., & Gardiner, K. (2012) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.8689 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Watt, A. M., Faragher, I. G., Griffin, T. T., Rieger, N. A., & Maddern, G. J.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 246
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-30
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089958489
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-expanding Metallic Stents for Relieving Malignant Colorectal Obstruction: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.sla.0000261124.72687.72
- The paper
- Watt, A. M., Faragher, I. G., Griffin, T. T., Rieger, N. A., & Maddern, G. J. (2007). Self-expanding Metallic Stents for Relieving Malignant Colorectal Obstruction: A Systematic Review. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000261124.72687.72
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.