Cited by 173Airway Management and Intubation TechniquesTrauma and Emergency Care StudiesRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

Prehospital Endotracheal Intubation for Trauma Does Not Improve Survival over Bag-Valve-Mask Ventilation

Stockinger, Zsolt T., McSwain, Norman E.·2004·The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care

Abstract

Background Few data exist supporting a survival benefit to prehospital endotracheal intubation (ETI) over bag-valve-mask ventilation (BVM) in trauma patients. Methods Data were reviewed from all trauma patients transported to our Level I trauma center receiving prehospital ETI or BVM. Mortality was adjusted by age, Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, and mechanism of injury (penetrating vs. blunt). Results Of 5,773 patients, 316 (5.5%) had ETI and 217 (3.8%) had BVM. Patients receiving ETI were significantly more like to die (88.9% vs. 30.9%, p Conclusion In our trauma system, when corrected for mechanism and severity of anatomic and physiologic injury, ETI confers no survival advantage over BVM and slightly increases prehospital time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ta.0000111755.94642.29

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prehospital advanced airway management may increase mortality for trauma patients in some circumstances.

    “there is a growing body of evidence that prehospital advanced airway management may increase mortality for trauma patients in some circumstances.8,[12][13][14]”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [12]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stockinger, Z. T., & McSwain, N. E.
Affiliations
Tulane University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
Published
2004-03
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
531-536
ISSN
0022-5282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044269676
Cited by
173
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
13.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
prehospital endotracheal intubation, bag-mask ventilation, trauma patients, survival, mortality, prehospital time, trauma resuscitation, penetrating trauma, blunt trauma, Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Child, Preschool, Emergency Medical Services, Equipment Design, Female, Hospitals, University, Humans, Intubation, Intratracheal, Louisiana, Male, Middle Aged, Neurologic Examination, Respiration, Artificial, Retrospective Studies, Thoracic Injuries, Trauma Centers, Wounds, Nonpenetrating, Wounds, Penetrating, Trauma Severity Indices, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Hospital Mortality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review