The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Prospective, Randomized Evaluation of Intra-abdominal Pressures with Crystalloid and Colloid Resuscitation in Burn Patients
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The volume of resuscitation in burn patients has been shown to correlate with intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). Limiting volume may reduce consequences of IAP and abdominal compartment syndrome. Colloid resuscitation has been previously shown to limit the volume required initially after burn. METHODS: Thirty-one patients were prospectively followed. Inclusion criteria were a burn of 25% total body surface area with inhalation injury or 40% total body surface area without. Patients received crystalloid (Parkland formula) or plasma resuscitation. IAP was measured by means of urinary bladder transduction. RESULTS: Mean age, area of burn, and baseline IAP were not different. Urine output was maintained. There was a greater increase in IAP with crystalloid (26.5 vs. 10.6 mmHg, p < 0.0001). Two patients in the plasma group developed IAP greater than 25 mmHg; only one patient in the crystalloid group maintained IAP less than 25 mmHg. More fluid volume was required with crystalloid resuscitation, 0.26 L/kg, versus 0.21 L/kg (p < 0.005). Correlation was seen in both groups between volume of fluid and IAP (crystalloid, r = 0.351; plasma, r = 0.657; all patients, r = 0.621). CONCLUSION: Plasma-resuscitated patients maintained an IAP below the threshold of complications of intra-abdominal hypertension. This appears to be a direct result of the decrease in volume required. Lower fluid volume regimens should be given consideration as the incidence and consequences of intra-abdominal hypertension in burn patients continue to be defined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Malbrain, M. L. N. G., Cheatham, M. L., Kirkpatrick, A., Sugrue, M., Parr, M., De Waele, J., Balogh, Z., Leppäniemi, A., Olvera, C., Ivatury, R., et al. (2006) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-006-0349-5 · Cited by 1,532
The Phenomenon of “Fluid Creep” in Acute Burn Resuscitation
Saffle, J. R. (2007) · Journal of Burn Care & Research · doi:10.1097/bcr.0b013e318053d3a1 · Cited by 326
Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people
Lewis, S. R., Pritchard, M. W., Evans, D. J., Butler, A. R., Alderson, P., Smith, A. F., & Roberts, I. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000567.pub7 · Cited by 315
The Association Between Fluid Administration and Outcome Following Major Burn: A Multicenter Study
Klein, M. B., Hayden, D., Elson, C., Nathens, A. B., Gamelli, R. L., Gibran, N. S., Herndon, D. N., Arnoldo, B., Silver, G., Schoenfeld, D., et al. (2007) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000252572.50684.49 · Cited by 274
Peeters, Y., Vandervelden, S., Wise, R., & Malbrain, M. L. N. G. (2015) · Anestezjologia Intensywna Terapia · doi:10.5603/ait.a2015.0063 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- O???Mara, M. S., Slater, H., Goldfarb, I. W., & Caushaj, P. F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1011-1018
- ISSN
- 0022-5282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017465761
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Prospective, Randomized Evaluation of Intra-abdominal Pressures with Crystalloid and Colloid Resuscitation in Burn Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ta.0000162732.39083.15
- The paper
- O???Mara, M. S., Slater, H., Goldfarb, I. W., & Caushaj, P. F. (2005). A Prospective, Randomized Evaluation of Intra-abdominal Pressures with Crystalloid and Colloid Resuscitation in Burn Patients. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000162732.39083.15
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.