The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcome of Severely Injured Patients Treated in Trauma Centers Following the Establishment of Trauma Systems
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The establishment of trauma systems was anticipated to improve overall survival for the severely injured patient. We systematically reviewed the published literature to assess if outcome from severe traumatic injury is improved for patients following the establishment of a trauma system. METHODS: A systematic literature review of all population-based studies that evaluated trauma system performance was conducted. A qualitative analysis of each study's design and methodology and a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the evidence to date of trauma system effectiveness. RESULTS: A search of the literature yielded 14 published articles. Trauma systems demonstrated improved odds of survival in 8 of the 14 reports. The overall quality-weighted odds ratio was 0.85 lower mortality following trauma system implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the meta-analysis showed a 15% reduction in mortality in favor of the presence of a trauma system. Evaluation of trauma system effectiveness must remain an uncompromising commitment to optimal outcome for the injured patient.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
Jadad, A. R., Moore, R. A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C., Reynolds, D. J. M., Gavaghan, D. J., & McQuay, H. J. (1996) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 · Cited by 17,582
Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score.
Boyd, C. R., Tolson, M. A., & Copes, W. S. (1987) · PubMed · Cited by 1,954
Evaluating Trauma Care: The TRISS Method
BOYD, C. R., TOLSON, M. A., & COPES, W. S. (1987) · The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care · doi:10.1097/00005373-198704000-00005 · Cited by 1,812
The Major Trauma Outcome Study: establishing national norms for trauma care.
Champion, H. R., Copes, W. S., Sacco, W. J., Lawnick, M. M., Keast, S. L., Bain, L. W., Flanagan, M. E., & Frey, C. F. (1990) · PubMed · Cited by 1,100
The Major Trauma Outcome Study: Establishing National Norms for Trauma Care
CHAMPION, H. R., COPES, W. S., SACCO, W. J., LAWNICK, M. M., KEAST, S. L., & FREY, C. F. (1990) · The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care · doi:10.1097/00005373-199011000-00008 · Cited by 950
Systems of Trauma Care: A Study of Two Counties
West, J. G. (1979) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370280109016 · Cited by 549
The Relation between Funding by the National Institutes of Health and the Burden of Disease
Gross, C. P., Anderson, G. F., & Powe, N. R. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199906173402406 · Cited by 509
ICISS: An International Classification of Disease-9 Based Injury Severity Score
Osler, T., Rutledge, R., Deis, J., & Bedrick, E. (1996) · The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care · doi:10.1097/00005373-199609000-00002 · Cited by 443
Effectiveness of State Trauma Systems in Reducing Injury-Related Mortality: A National Evaluation
Nathens, A. B., Jurkovich, G. J., Rivara, F. P., & Maier, R. V. (2000) · The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care · doi:10.1097/00005373-200001000-00005 · Cited by 424
Trauma Care Regionalization: A Process-Outcome Evaluation
Sampalis, J. S., Denis, R., Lavoie, A., Frechette, P., Boukas, S., Nikolis, A., Benoit, D., Fleiszer, D., Brown, R., Churchill-Smith, M., et al. (1999) · The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care · doi:10.1097/00005373-199904000-00004 · Cited by 408
Cited by
van Diepen, S., Katz, J. N., Albert, N. M., Henry, T. D., Jacobs, A. K., Kapur, N. K., Kilic, A., Menon, V., Ohman, E. M., Sweitzer, N. K., et al. (2017) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000525 · Cited by 1,869
Changing the System - Major Trauma Patients and Their Outcomes in the NHS (England) 2008–17
Moran, C. G., Lecky, F., Bouamra, O., Lawrence, T., Edwards, A., Woodford, M., Willett, K., & Coats, T. J. (2018) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.07.001 · Cited by 384
A systematic review of the evidence for telemedicine in burn care: With a UK perspective
Wallace, D. L., Hussain, A., Khan, N., & Wilson, Y. T. (2012) · Burns · doi:10.1016/j.burns.2011.09.024 · Cited by 75
The effect of a nurse team leader on communication and leadership in major trauma resuscitations
Clements, A., Curtis, K., Horvat, L., & Shaban, R. Z. (2015) · International Emergency Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ienj.2014.04.004 · Cited by 54
Emergency general surgery transfers in the United States: a 10-year analysis
Reinke, C. E., Thomason, M., Paton, L., Schiffern, L., Rozario, N., & Matthews, B. D. (2017) · Journal of Surgical Research · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.058 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Celso, B., Tepas, J., Langland-Orban, B., Pracht, E., Papa, L., Lottenberg, L., & Flint, L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 371-378
- ISSN
- 0022-5282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064454933
- Cited by
- 696
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcome of Severely Injured Patients Treated in Trauma Centers Following the Establishment of Trauma Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ta.0000197916.99629.eb
- The paper
- Celso, B., Tepas, J., Langland-Orban, B., Pracht, E., Papa, L., Lottenberg, L., & Flint, L. (2006). A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcome of Severely Injured Patients Treated in Trauma Centers Following the Establishment of Trauma Systems. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000197916.99629.eb
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
