Cited by 51Trauma and Emergency Care StudiesEmergency and Acute Care StudiesHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Emergency general surgery transfers in the United States: a 10-year analysis

Reinke, Caroline E., Thomason, Michael, Paton, Lauren, Schiffern, Lynn, Rozario, Nigel, Matthews, Brent D.·2017·Journal of Surgical Research

Abstract

Background Emergency general surgery (EGS) admissions account for more than three million hospitalizations in the US annually; and interhospital transfers (IHTs) are costly. We aimed to better understand the population of transferred EGS patients and their subsequent care in a nationally representative sample.Methods Using the 2002-2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified patients aged ≥18 years with an EGS noncardiovascular principal diagnosis who were transferred from another hospital with urgent or emergent admission status. Patient demographics, hospitalization characteristics, rates of operation, and mortality were identified. Procedure codes were classified into surgery and procedures based on the HCUP Surgery Flag.Results We identified an estimated 525,913 EGS admissions transferred from another acute care hospital. The mean age was 60 years, 51% were female, and >50% were Medicare patients. The rate of EGS IHTs increased while mortality decreased. Surgery was required for only 33% of transferred patients. The most common surgeries were laparoscopic cholecystectomy, lysis of adhesions, and wound debridement. The median length of stay was 4.4 days, 92% of patients were cared for in urban hospitals, and >50% in teaching hospitals.Conclusions The percent of patients with an EGS diagnosis requiring IHT is increasing, which may reflect a trend toward regionalization of EGS. Transfers require significant resources and may delay care. More than half of the EGS patients did not require surgical intervention. Future studies to identify populations who benefit from IHT and ideal timing of transfer can establish opportunities for optimizing resource utilization and patient outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.058

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reinke, C. E., Thomason, M., Paton, L., Schiffern, L., Rozario, N., & Matthews, B. D.
Affiliations
  • Carolinas Medical Center (US)
  • Carolinas Healthcare System (US)
Corresponding author
Reinke, Caroline E.
Venue
Journal of Surgical Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
219
Pages
128-135
ISSN
0022-4804 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2726048282
Cited by
51
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Surgical Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
emergency general surgery, interhospital transfer, hospital readmission, regionalization of care, postoperative mortality, length of hospital stay, teaching hospitals, Medicare beneficiaries, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, adhesiolysis, wound debridement, resource utilization (health care)
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Emergency Medical Services, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Transfer, General Surgery, United States, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review