The DOI matches its Crossref record.
LIVER REGENERATION AND SURGICAL OUTCOME IN DONORS OF RIGHT-LOBE LIVER GRAFTS
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Previous studies of healthy live-liver donors have suggested that complete liver regeneration occurs within a matter of weeks; however, there have been no long-term studies evaluating liver regeneration and few studies documenting long-term donor outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one donors who provided right-lobe grafts underwent volumetric spiral computed tomography scans preoperatively and postoperatively at time intervals of 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Patient demographics, surgical data, and postoperative outcome were correlated with liver regeneration data. Donor surgical outcome was followed prospectively and recorded in a comprehensive database. RESULTS: Thirty-three males and 18 females (mean age 36.0+/-9.6 years) provided 51 right-lobe grafts. Mean follow-up was 9.8+/-3.4 months. No donor operation was aborted, and surgical morbidity and mortality rates were 39% and 0%, respectively. Donor remnant liver volume was 49.4+/-5.7% of the original total liver volume (TLV). Overall liver regeneration was 83.3+/-9.0% of the TLV by 1 year. Female donors had significantly slower liver regrowth when compared with males at 12 months (79.8+/-9.3% vs. 85.6+/-8.2%, P<0.01). There was no effect of age, body mass index, operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative complications, or perioperative liver function tests on liver regeneration. DISCUSSION: Liver regeneration continues throughout the first postoperative year. Only one donor achieved complete liver regeneration during this time period; however, all donors have maintained normal liver function without long-term complications. Longer follow-up is needed to determine whether donors ever achieve original TLV.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fausto, N., Campbell, J. S., & Riehle, K. J. (2006) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.20969 · Cited by 1,378
Living donor liver transplantation—Adult donor outcomes: A systematic review
Middleton, P. F., Duffield, M., Lynch, S. V., Padbury, R. T. A., House, T., Stanton, P., Verran, D., & Maddern, G. (2006) · Liver Transplantation · doi:10.1002/lt.20663 · Cited by 281
Volumetric and functional recovery of the liver after right hepatectomy for living donation
Nadalin, S., Testa, G., Malagó, M., Beste, M., Frilling, A., Schroeder, T., Jochum, C., Gerken, G., & Broelsch, C. E. (2004) · Liver Transplantation · doi:10.1002/lt.20182 · Cited by 130
Lock, J. F., Malinowski, M., Seehofer, D., Hoppe, S., Röhl, R. I., Niehues, S. M., Neuhaus, P., & Stockmann, M. (2012) · Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00423-012-0972-2 · Cited by 68
Consumptive Hypothyroidism Resulting from Hepatic Vascular Tumors in an Athyreotic Adult
Howard, D., La Rosa, F. G., Huang, S., Salvatore, D., Mulcahey, M., Sang-Lee, J., Wachs, M., & Klopper, J. P. (2011) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2010-2104 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Pomfret, E. A., Pomposelli, J. J., Gordon, F. D., Erbay, N., Price, L. L., Lewis, W. D., & Jenkins, R. L.
- Venue
- Transplantation
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-10
- ISSN
- 0041-1337 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057164764
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LIVER REGENERATION AND SURGICAL OUTCOME IN DONORS OF RIGHT-LOBE LIVER GRAFTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.tp.0000079064.08263.8e
- The paper
- Pomfret, E. A., Pomposelli, J. J., Gordon, F. D., Erbay, N., Price, L. L., Lewis, W. D., & Jenkins, R. L. (2003). LIVER REGENERATION AND SURGICAL OUTCOME IN DONORS OF RIGHT-LOBE LIVER GRAFTS. Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000079064.08263.8e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.