The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human plasma as a dermal scaffold for the generation of a completely autologous bioengineered skin
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Keratinocyte cultures have been used for the treatment of severe burn patients. Here, we describe a new cultured bioengineered skin based on (1) keratinocytes and fibroblasts obtained from a single skin biopsy and (2) a dermal matrix based on human plasma. A high expansion capacity achieved by keratinocytes grown on this plasma-based matrix is reported. In addition, the results of successful preclinical and clinical tests are presented. METHODS: Keratinocytes and fibroblasts were obtained by a double enzymatic digestion (trypsin and collagenase, respectively). In this setting, human fibroblasts are embedded in a clotted plasma-based matrix that serves as a three-dimensional scaffold. Human keratinocytes are seeded on the plasma-based scaffold to form the epidermal component of the skin construct. Regeneration performance of the plasma-based bioengineered skin was tested on immunodeficient mice as a preclinical approach. Finally, this skin equivalent was grafted on two severely burned patients. RESULTS: Keratinocytes seeded on the plasma-based scaffold grew to confluence, allowing a 1,000-fold cultured-area expansion after 24 to 26 days of culture. Experimental transplantation of human keratinocytes expanded on the engineered plasma scaffold yielded optimum epidermal architecture and phenotype, including the expression of structural intracellular proteins and basement-membrane components. In addition, we report here the successful engraftment and stable skin regeneration in two severely burned patients at 1 and 2 years follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that this new dermal equivalent allows for (1) generation of large bioengineered skin surfaces, (2) restoration of both the epidermal and dermal skin compartments, and (3) functional epidermal stem-cell preservation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
3D bioprinting of functional human skin: production and in vivo analysis
Cubo, N., Garcia, M., del Cañizo, J. F., Velasco, D., & Jorcano, J. L. (2016) · Biofabrication · doi:10.1088/1758-5090/9/1/015006 · Cited by 454
Self-citationBreakthrough treatments for accelerated wound healing
Freedman, B. R., Hwang, C., Talbot, S., Hibler, B., Matoori, S., & Mooney, D. J. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.ade7007 · Cited by 447
Cultured epithelial autograft (CEA) in burn treatment: Three decades later
Atiyeh, B. S., & Costagliola, M. (2007) · Burns · doi:10.1016/j.burns.2006.11.002 · Cited by 327
Metadata
- Authors
- Llames, S. G., Del Rio, M., Larcher, F., García, E., García, M., José Escamez, M., Jorcano, J. L., Holguín, P., & Meana, A.
- Venue
- Transplantation
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 350-355
- ISSN
- 0041-1337 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017965318
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human plasma as a dermal scaffold for the generation of a completely autologous bioengineered skin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.tp.0000112381.80964.85
- The paper
- Llames, S. G., Del Rio, M., Larcher, F., García, E., García, M., José Escamez, M., Jorcano, J. L., Holguín, P., & Meana, A. (2004). Human plasma as a dermal scaffold for the generation of a completely autologous bioengineered skin. Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000112381.80964.85
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.