Writing for Publication: Avoiding Common Ethical Pitfalls
Abstract
Siedlecki, Sandra L.; Montague, Mary; Schultz, JoannEditor(s): Bliss, Donna Z. PhD, RN, FAAN Author Information
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies have shown that reference and citation errors are often neglected in different specialty journals.
“Studies have shown that reference and citation errors are often neglected in different specialty journals”
From How accurate are cited references in Iranian peer-reviewed journals? (2016) · cites this paper as Siedlecki et al., 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How accurate are cited references in Iranian peer-reviewed journals?
Ghane, M. R. (2016) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1002/leap.1000 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Siedlecki, S. L., Montague, M., & Schultz, J.
- Affiliations
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- ORCID
- Siedlecki, Sandra L.
- Venue
- Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-150
- ISSN
- 1071-5754 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2315010402
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Cleveland Clinic
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Keywords
- writing for publication, academic writing, nursing research communication, manuscript preparation
- MeSH terms
- Authorship, Bibliographies as Topic, Humans, Periodicals as Topic, Publishing, Writing, Nursing Research, Duplicate Publications as Topic, Plagiarism, Scientific Misconduct, Guidelines as Topic, Editorial Policies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
