Cited by 558Innovations in Medical EducationClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsCompetency Development and Evaluation

Amending miller’s pyramid to include professional identity formation.

Open access
Cruess, Richard L., Cruess, Sylvia R., Steinert, Yvonne·2016·Academic Medicine

Abstract

In 1990, George Miller published an article entitled "The Assessment of Clinical Skills/Competence/Performance" that had an immediate and lasting impact on medical education. In his classic article, he stated that no single method of assessment could encompass the intricacies and complexities of medical practice. To provide a structured approach to the assessment of medical competence, he proposed a pyramidal structure with four levels, each of which required specific methods of assessment. As is well known, the layers are "Knows," "Knows How," "Shows How," and "Does." Miller's pyramid has guided assessment since its introduction; it has also been used to assist in the assessment of professionalism.The recent emphasis on professional identity formation has raised questions about the appropriateness of "Does" as the highest level of aspiration. It is believed that a more reliable indicator of professional behavior is the incorporation of the values and attitudes of the professional into the identity of the aspiring physician. It is therefore proposed that a fifth level be added at the apex of the pyramid. This level, reflecting the presence of a professional identity, should be "Is," and methods of assessing progress toward a professional identity and the nature of the identity in formation should be guided by currently available methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/acm.0000000000000913

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cruess, R. L., Cruess, S. R., & Steinert, Y.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Cruess, Richard L.
  • Cruess, Sylvia R.
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
2016-02
Volume
91
Issue
2
Pages
180-185
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2408037656
Cited by
558
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Competency Development and Evaluation
Keywords
Miller's pyramid, professional identity formation, professionalism assessment, clinical competence assessment, medical education assessment
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Educational Measurement, Humans, Periodicals as Topic, Physicians

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review