Application effect of Miller’s pyramid teaching method based on HeartCode BLS in basic life support training for nursing students
Open accessAbstract
Background: Basic life support (BLS) competence is a core professional skill for nursing students, yet conventional training often fails to achieve durable gains in knowledge, psychomotor performance, and clinical transfer. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a Miller’s pyramid-based HeartCode BLS teaching model compared with traditional instruction in undergraduate nursing students. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 229 eligible nursing students were enrolled and assigned to a control group ( n = 115) or an observation group ( n = 114). The observation group received a HeartCode BLS teaching model structured according to Miller’s pyramid, whereas the control group received conventional BLS teaching. Outcomes were assessed using the Kirkpatrick four-level evaluation framework, including post-training theoretical examination scores, 1-week skill performance, CPR quality indicators, 3-month high-fidelity simulation-based comprehensive application ability, and learner satisfaction. Between-group comparisons were conducted using chi-square tests, independent-samples t -tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, and repeated-measures ANOVA, as appropriate. Findings: Baseline characteristics and pre-training scores were comparable between groups. After training, the observation group achieved significantly higher scores than the control group in theoretical knowledge (74.29 ± 9.94 vs. 68.81 ± 9.33), CPR skills (85.92 ± 8.67 vs. 79.80 ± 7.56), and defibrillation skills (85.48 ± 8.63 vs. 78.86 ± 5.77; all p < 0.001). CPR quality indicators, including compression depth, compression rate, chest recoil, and bag-valve-mask ventilation, were also significantly better in the observation group (all p < 0.001). A greater proportion of students in the observation group maintained total compression interruption times below 30 s (57.0% vs. 25.2%; p < 0.001). Learner satisfaction was consistently higher across all domains (all p < 0.001). At 3 months, the observation group also outperformed the control group in emergency judgment and decision-making, emergency procedure execution, team communication and collaboration, and total simulation score (all p < 0.001). Interpretation: A Miller’s Pyramid-based HeartCode BLS teaching model was associated with significantly improved immediate learning outcomes, CPR quality, learner satisfaction, and mid-term integrated clinical performance among nursing students. This theory-informed, feedback-enabled instructional strategy may offer a scalable and effective approach for optimizing BLS education in undergraduate nursing, although multicenter studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm generalizability and long-term retention.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a single-center randomized controlled trial of 229 nursing students, a Miller’s pyramid-based HeartCode BLS teaching model improved post-training knowledge, CPR/defibrillation skills, CPR quality, satisfaction, and 3-month simulation performance compared with conventional BLS instruction. The authors conclude the model may be practical and scalable but call for multicenter studies and longer follow-up.
Key findings
- Post-training scores were significantly higher in the observation group than the control group for theoretical knowledge (74.29 ± 9.94 vs. 68.81 ± 9.33), CPR skills (85.92 ± 8.67 vs. 79.80 ± 7.56), and defibrillation skills (85.48 ± 8.63 vs. 78.86 ± 5.77; all p < 0.001), with large interaction effect sizes for CPR (Ges = 0.252) and defibrillation (Ges = 0.292).
- CPR quality compliance was significantly better in the observation group across compression depth, compression rate, chest recoil, and bag-valve-mask ventilation (all p < 0.001); bag-valve-mask ventilation showed the largest difference (median 80.00% vs. 55.00%, r = 0.642), and more observation-group students kept total compression interruption time below 30 s (57.0% vs. 25.2%; p < 0.001, Cramér’s V = 0.333).
- Satisfaction was higher in the observation group across all five items and the total score (all p < 0.001); total median score was 25.00 vs. 16.00 (r = 0.845), with the largest item difference for “improved clinical emergency response ability” (median 5.00 vs. 2.00; r = 0.863).
- At 3 months, team-level high-fidelity simulation scores were higher in the observation group for emergency judgment and decision-making, emergency operation and execution, team communication and collaboration, and total score (all p < 0.001); total median score was 68.48 vs. 45.34 (r = 0.381).
Methods
- Randomized controlled trial: 257 nursing students assessed for eligibility, 236 randomized, and 229 analyzed (114 observation, 115 control) after 7 lost to follow-up. Participants were clinical-intern nursing students at People’s Hospital of Quzhou, Zhejiang, China, with no prior systematic BLS training; allocation used a computer random-number generator and sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes.
- The observation group received a Miller’s pyramid-based HeartCode BLS model including online cognitive self-study, QCPR virtual real-time-feedback skills practice, scenario-based risk-point training, and high-fidelity team simulation with structured debriefing (810 min total). The control group received conventional instructor-centered lecture, demonstration, and supervised group practice (720 min total); faculty, venue, manikin model, and assessment criteria were otherwise kept consistent.
- Outcomes followed the Kirkpatrick four-level framework: post-training theoretical examination, 1-week skill assessment and CPR quality indicators recorded by Anne QCPR, 3-month high-fidelity simulation assessment, and satisfaction questionnaire. Analyses used chi-square tests, independent-samples t-tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, and repeated-measures ANOVA; the 3-month simulation was analyzed at the team level (23 teams per group).
Limitations
- The paper states that the study was single-center and drawn from one nursing institution, limiting external generalizability; follow-up was only 3 months, with no 6- or 12-month retention data; all skill evaluations occurred in simulation rather than authentic clinical settings; instructor-related variables were not fully controlled; technical disruptions could interfere with the HeartCode platform; and the study was not blinded, with possible Hawthorne effects.
- The text also makes evident that instructional time was not equal between groups (observation 810 min vs. control 720 min, a difference of up to 90 min), so dose or contact-time differences cannot be excluded as a source of between-group effects.
- The 3-month simulation outcome was analyzed at the team level (23 teams per group), reducing the effective sample size for that outcome compared with the individual-level analyses.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
14 of 26 cited sources checked · 10 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Low-dose, high-frequency Resuscitation Quality Improvement (RQI) programs, delivering quarterly CPR practice sessions combined with real-time feedback, effectively maintain and even enhance students' compression and ventilation skills.
“Oermann et al. demonstrated that low-dose, high-frequency Resuscitation Quality Improvement (RQI) programs, delivering quarterly CPR practice sessions combined with real-time feedback, effectively maintain and even enhance students’ compression and ventilation skills (27, 28).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [27] Oermann, 2020, Training interval in cardiopulmonary resuscitation., PLoS One source
The Methods (CPR training; page unavailable) describe brief RQI practice sessions with real-time feedback, including a quarterly group. The Results (Effects of training intervals on quality of compressions and ventilations; page unavailable) show improvement in both skills for that group. But quarterly students had the lowest scores, and their session-4 ventilation mean was 68.1%, below the study’s 75% performance target; the claim that quarterly practice effectively maintained both skills overstates the findings. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [28] Oermann, 2024, Maintenance of CPR skills among nursing students trained using resuscitation quality Improvement® program., Resusc Plus source
- Premisecitation
Most studies compare isolated technologies or media without a unifying theoretical framework, leaving interventions to target only fragments of competence.
“most studies compare isolated technologies or media without a unifying theoretical framework, leaving interventions to target only fragments of competence (8)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Mukurunge, 2024, Assessment approaches in undergraduate health professions education: towards the development of feasible assessment approaches for low-resource settings., BMC Med Educ source
The Results section on components of a feasible assessment approach describes analytic, developmental, and holistic assessment frameworks. Searches for technology or media comparisons, a lack of unifying theory, and interventions targeting fragments of competence found no passage making the cited claim. No page numbers were available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
BLS knowledge and psychomotor skills decay rapidly, often within months.
“both knowledge and psychomotor skills decay rapidly, often within months (5, 6)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [5] Soares, 2025, The importance of combined use of spacing and testing effects for complex skills training: a quasi-experimental study., Med Teach source
- cites [6] Charlier, 2020, Comparing student nurse knowledge and performance of basic life support algorithm actions: an observational post-retention test design study., Nurse Educ Pract source
- Premisecitation
Even after formal training, nursing students have recurrent BLS deficiencies, including insufficient compression depth, inefficient ventilation, and suboptimal use of the automated external defibrillator.
“Even after formal training, recurrent deficiencies persist, including insufficient compression depth, inefficient ventilation, and suboptimal use of the automated external defibrillator (3, 4)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [3] Miri, 2025, Identifying clinical error patterns in nursing students’ CPR performance: a mixed-methods OSCE study., Resusc Plus source
- cites [4] Pujalte-Jesús, 2021, The inefficiency of ventilation in basic resuscitation. Should we improve mouth-to-mouth ventilation training of nursing students?, Int Emerg Nurs source
- Premisecitation
Comparative evidence on technology-enhanced BLS instruction is inconsistent.
“Comparative evidence, however, is inconsistent: self-directed learning has yielded skill performance comparable to traditional instruction (16); virtual reality has shown no clear superiority over conventional simulation, despite greater cognitive engagement (13); and blended learning integrating online and in-person components may deliver superior overall CPR quality (17).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [16] Hsieh, 2016, Comparing the effect of self-instruction with that of traditional instruction in basic life support courses-a systematic review., Resuscitation source
- cites [13] Bodur, 2025, Evaluating the effectiveness of virtual reality simulation in CPR training for nursing students: a randomized controlled trial., Nurse Educ Pract source
- cites [17] Ocampo Cervantes, 2016, [Blended learning versus virtual reality and traditional methods in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: a randomized trial in university students]., Aten Primaria. source
- Findingown data
Following training, the observation group achieved significantly higher CPR skills scores than the control group (85.92 ± 8.67 vs. 79.80 ± 7.56).
“CPR skills (85.92 ± 8.67 vs. 79.80 ± 7.56)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Following training, the observation group achieved significantly higher theoretical knowledge scores than the control group (74.29 ± 9.94 vs. 68.81 ± 9.33).
“The observation group achieved markedly higher post-training scores than the control group across theoretical knowledge (74.29 ± 9.94 vs. 68.81 ± 9.33)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
No major barriers to implementation were encountered beyond occasional scheduling conflicts, which were resolved by arranging two make-up sessions.
“No major barriers to implementation were encountered beyond occasional scheduling conflicts, which were resolved by arranging two make-up sessions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The largest effect at 3 months was in the total score dimension (median 68.48 vs 45.34; r = 0.381).
“The largest effect was observed in the total score dimension (median: 68.48 vs. 45.34; r = 0.381)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The observation group exhibited a higher proportion of CPR-quality compliance than the control group.
“the observation group achieved significantly higher CPR and defibrillation skill scores than the control group, and also exhibited a higher proportion of CPR-quality compliance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Bag-valve-mask ventilation showed the most pronounced intergroup difference (median 80.00% vs 55.00%; r = 0.642).
“Among these, bag-valve-mask ventilation showed the most pronounced intergroup difference (median: 80.00% vs. 55.00%; r = 0.642)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Anne QCPR real-time feedback system provides valid and accurate measurements of CPR quality indicators.
- Findingown data
The observation group had significantly higher defibrillation skill performance than the control group.
“The observation group significantly outperformed the control group across multiple outcome domains, including theoretical examination scores, CPR skill performance, defibrillation skill performance, training satisfaction, and simulated integrated clinical performance assessed 3 months after training.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Team communication and collaboration showed a notable difference (median 16.50 vs 4.50; r = 0.359).
“while team communication and collaboration also showed a notable difference (median: 16.50 vs. 4.50; r = 0.359)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The observation group had significantly higher training satisfaction than the control group.
“The observation group significantly outperformed the control group across multiple outcome domains, including theoretical examination scores, CPR skill performance, defibrillation skill performance, training satisfaction, and simulated integrated clinical performance assessed 3 months after training.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
“The Miller’s Pyramid-based HeartCode BLS teaching model significantly improved theoretical knowledge, psychomotor performance, CPR quality, learner satisfaction, and 3-month comprehensive simulation performance among undergraduate nursing students compared with traditional instruction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
- Findingown data
The observation group had significantly higher theoretical examination scores than the control group.
“The observation group significantly outperformed the control group across multiple outcome domains, including theoretical examination scores, CPR skill performance, defibrillation skill performance, training satisfaction, and simulated integrated clinical performance assessed 3 months after training.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
“The Miller’s Pyramid-based HeartCode BLS teaching model significantly improved theoretical knowledge, psychomotor performance, CPR quality, learner satisfaction, and 3-month comprehensive simulation performance among undergraduate nursing students compared with traditional instruction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
- Findingown data
The observation group had significantly higher simulated integrated clinical performance at 3 months than the control group.
“The observation group significantly outperformed the control group across multiple outcome domains, including theoretical examination scores, CPR skill performance, defibrillation skill performance, training satisfaction, and simulated integrated clinical performance assessed 3 months after training.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
“The Miller’s Pyramid-based HeartCode BLS teaching model significantly improved theoretical knowledge, psychomotor performance, CPR quality, learner satisfaction, and 3-month comprehensive simulation performance among undergraduate nursing students compared with traditional instruction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
- Findingown data
The observation group reported significantly higher ratings than the control group across all five satisfaction dimensions and the composite total score (all P < 0.001).
“Across all five satisfaction dimensions and the composite total score, the observation group reported significantly higher ratings than the control group (all P < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The observation group had significantly higher CPR skill performance than the control group.
“The observation group significantly outperformed the control group across multiple outcome domains, including theoretical examination scores, CPR skill performance, defibrillation skill performance, training satisfaction, and simulated integrated clinical performance assessed 3 months after training.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
“The Miller’s Pyramid-based HeartCode BLS teaching model significantly improved theoretical knowledge, psychomotor performance, CPR quality, learner satisfaction, and 3-month comprehensive simulation performance among undergraduate nursing students compared with traditional instruction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Conclusion · plain
- Findingown data
Total instructional time was comparable between the two groups, with a difference of no more than 90 minutes.
“The total instructional time was comparable between the two groups (a difference of no more than 90 min; Table 1)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A significantly greater proportion of students in the observation group maintained total compression interruption times below 30 s (57.0% vs 25.2%; χ2 = 25.347, P < 0.001, Cramér's V = 0.333).
“a significantly greater proportion of nursing students in the observation group maintained interruptions below 30 s (57.0% vs. 25.2%; χ2 = 25.347, P < 0.001, Cramér’s V = 0.333)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Anne QCPR real-time feedback system provides valid and accurate measurements of CPR quality indicators.
- Findingown data
The total evaluation score was higher in the observation group (median 25.00 vs 16.00; r = 0.845).
“The total evaluation score further confirmed robust overall satisfaction in the observation group (median: 25.00 vs. 16.00; r = 0.845)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The item 'improved clinical emergency response ability' exhibited the largest intergroup difference (median 5.00 vs 2.00; r = 0.863).
“The item “improved clinical emergency response ability” exhibited the largest intergroup difference (median: 5.00 vs. 2.00; r = 0.863)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Following training, the observation group achieved significantly higher defibrillation skills scores than the control group (85.48 ± 8.63 vs. 78.86 ± 5.77).
“and defibrillation skills (85.48 ± 8.63 vs. 78.86 ± 5.77)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Apart from the instructional design itself, the two groups were kept consistent with respect to faculty, venue, manikin model, and assessment criteria.
“Apart from the instructional design itself, the two groups were kept consistent with respect to faculty, venue, manikin model, and assessment criteria, so as to maximize between-group comparability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The additional cost of the model is largely attributable to the licensing of the digital platform rather than to new equipment.
“the additional cost is largely attributable to the licensing of the digital platform rather than to new equipment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The principal resources required, QCPR feedback-enabled manikins and AHA-certified instructors, form part of the standard configuration of teaching hospitals.
- Interpretationreasoning
The model can be implemented within the resources already available in most teaching hospitals.
“Regarding practical feasibility, the model can be implemented within the resources already available in most teaching hospitals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The principal resources required, QCPR feedback-enabled manikins and AHA-certified instructors, form part of the standard configuration of teaching hospitals.
- Interpretationown data
The real-time feedback mechanism embedded in the HeartCode BLS system was particularly effective in refining bag-valve-mask ventilation.
“suggesting that the real-time feedback mechanism embedded in the HeartCode BLS system was particularly effective in refining this technically challenging skill component.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Anne QCPR real-time feedback system provides valid and accurate measurements of CPR quality indicators.
- Premisecitation
Existing instructional approaches cannot reliably secure both the acquisition and long-term retention of BLS skills.
“An integrative review by Dick-Smith et al. similarly underscored that existing instructional approaches cannot reliably secure both the acquisition and long-term retention of BLS skills”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Dick-Smith, 2021, Basic life support training for undergraduate nursing students: an integrative review., Nurse Educ Pract source
- Study design and conductown data
The present study employed a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of the Miller's-pyramid-based HeartCode BLS instructional model against conventional instruction for BLS training in nursing students.
“The present study employed a randomized controlled trial to systematically compare the effectiveness of the Miller’-pyramid-based HeartCode BLS instructional model against conventional instruction for BLS training in nursing students.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Miller's Pyramid-based HeartCode BLS teaching model produced substantially greater learning gains than the traditional approach.
“demonstrating that Miller’s Pyramid-based HeartCode BLS teaching model produced substantially greater learning gains than the traditional approach.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The total instructional time difference of up to 90 min between groups does not materially confound the between-group comparison.
- Study design and conductown data
Although integrated clinical performance was assessed at 3 months, longer-term follow-up (for example, 6 or 12 months) was not conducted.
“although integrated clinical performance was assessed at 3 months, longer-term follow-up (for example, 6 or 12 months) was not conducted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
This theory-informed, feedback-enabled instructional strategy may offer a scalable and effective approach for optimizing BLS education in undergraduate nursing.
“This theory-informed, feedback-enabled instructional strategy may offer a scalable and effective approach for optimizing BLS education in undergraduate nursing, although multicenter studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm generalizability and long-term retention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The total instructional time difference of up to 90 min between groups does not materially confound the between-group comparison.
- Rests on an assumption: The Anne QCPR real-time feedback system provides valid and accurate measurements of CPR quality indicators.
- Interpretationown data
The present findings should be interpreted as reflecting an emergent, simulation-based form of clinical transfer rather than verified independent clinical performance.
“The present findings should therefore be interpreted as reflecting an emergent, simulation-based form of clinical transfer rather than verified independent clinical performance”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The immersive, scenario-based training experience most powerfully enhanced students' perceived readiness for emergency clinical situations.
“suggesting that the immersive, scenario-based training experience most powerfully enhanced students’ perceived readiness for emergency clinical situations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The theoretical advantage observed in the present study may be partly ascribed to the integration of active-learning elements within HeartCode, wherein a self-paced, feedback-rich environment fosters deeper understanding and internalization of knowledge to a greater degree than traditional didactic instruction.
“The theoretical advantage observed in the present study may therefore be partly ascribed to the integration of active-learning elements within HeartCode, wherein a self-paced, feedback-rich environment fosters deeper understanding and internalization of knowledge to a greater degree than traditional didactic instruction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Simulation-based assessment cannot fully capture the stress responses and team-coordination dynamics inherent to real clinical encounters.
“it cannot fully capture the stress responses and team-coordination dynamics inherent to real clinical encounters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Simulation-based assessment correlates positively with clinical competence to some degree.
- Interpretationown data
The integrative-performance advantage observed in the observation group is best interpreted as reflecting the nascent emergence of the apex "Trusted" competency of Miller's pyramid.
“The integrative-performance advantage observed in the observation group of the present study is therefore best interpreted as reflecting the nascent emergence of the apex “Trusted” competency of Miller’s pyramid”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
By incorporating diverse scenarios of progressively increasing complexity, HeartCode BLS affords learners meaningful opportunities to cultivate integrative competence.
“By incorporating diverse scenarios of progressively increasing complexity, HeartCode BLS affords learners meaningful opportunities to cultivate such integrative competence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Integrating competency-based pedagogy with digital learning, real-time feedback, and scenario simulation can strengthen both immediate skill acquisition and the transfer of BLS competence into higher-order clinical application.
“These findings suggest that integrating competency-based pedagogy with digital learning, real-time feedback, and scenario simulation can strengthen both immediate skill acquisition and the transfer of BLS competence into higher-order clinical application.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 35
- May combine two claims. 36
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOnline and blended learning sustain instructional continuity and improve theoretical knowledge.
“Online and blended learning sustain instructional continuity and improve theoretical knowledge (10, 11)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] Lactona, 2021, Efficacy and knowledge of conducting CPR through online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: literature review., J Public Health Res source
- cites [11] Tobase, 2017, The effects of an online basic life support course on undergraduate nursing students’ learning., Int J Med Educ source
The Results (page unavailable) report significantly higher written-test scores after the online BLS course, supporting improved theoretical knowledge in undergraduate nursing students. The Conclusions say the course could be used for continuing education, but the paper does not establish that online or blended learning sustains instructional continuity, and it does not study blended learning. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe study adopted the Kirkpatrick Four-Level Evaluation Model as its overall assessment framework.
“This study adopts the classic Kirkpatrick Four-Level Evaluation Model (18, 19) as its overall assessment framework.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationExtended reality provides immersive environments supporting psychomotor skill acquisition.
“extended reality provides immersive environments supporting psychomotor skill acquisition (13, 14)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [13] Bodur, 2025, Evaluating the effectiveness of virtual reality simulation in CPR training for nursing students: a randomized controlled trial., Nurse Educ Pract source
- cites [14] Fijačko, 2025, Extended reality technologies in adult basic life support education: a scoping review., Resusc Plus source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationReal-time feedback confers a distinct advantage for on-the-spot correction of technique compared with post-hoc video debriefing in BLS training.
“Ghaderi et al. compared real-time feedback with post-hoc video debriefing in BLS training and found that, although both modalities were effective, real-time feedback conferred a distinct advantage for on-the-spot correction of technique (29).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Ghaderi, 2023, Comparison of real-time feedback and debriefing by video recording on basic life support skill in nursing students., BMC Med Educ source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSmartphone-based serious games offer novel means for autonomous knowledge consolidation.
“smartphone-based serious games offer novel means for autonomous knowledge consolidation (15)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Fijačko, 2024, Effects of a serious smartphone game on nursing students’ theoretical knowledge and practical skills in adult basic life support: randomized wait list-controlled trial., JMIR Serious Games source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe combined application of spacing and testing effects significantly improved 3-month retention of both basic and advanced life support skills, whereas learners receiving a single simulation session exhibited substantial skill decay.
“Soares et al. demonstrated that the combined application of spacing and testing effects significantly improved 3-month retention of both basic and advanced life support skills, whereas learners receiving a single simulation session exhibited substantial skill decay (5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Soares, 2025, The importance of combined use of spacing and testing effects for complex skills training: a quasi-experimental study., Med Teach source
The Results (page unavailable) report that the combined intervention maintained BLS skills after three months, while the single-session control group showed BLS skill decay. They do not support the same claim for ALS skills: performance did not differ significantly between groups or across the three time points, and neither group showed significant ALS skill decay. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataBefore training, the two groups did not differ significantly in educational background, gender, age, or baseline BLS-related theoretical and skill scores (all P > 0.05).
“Before training, the two groups of nursing students were compared across educational background, gender, age, and baseline BLS-related theoretical and skill scores. No statistically significant differences were identified in any of these variables (all P > 0.05), confirming that the two groups were well-matched at baseline and that subsequent between-group comparisons were methodologically sound (”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe enrolled students comprised 19 from technical secondary schools, 166 from junior colleges, and 44 undergraduates, and this distribution did not differ significantly between groups.
“The enrolled students represented the typical composition of clinical-intern nursing students, comprising 19 from technical secondary schools, 166 from junior colleges, and 44 undergraduates; these categories denote the students’ pre-service nursing qualification level, and their distribution did not differ significantly between the two groups (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt 3 months, the observation group significantly outperformed the control group in all three competency dimensions (emergency judgment and decision-making, emergency operation and execution, team communication and collaboration) and in the total composite score (all P < 0.001).
“The observation group significantly outperformed the control group in all three competency dimensions, emergency judgment and decision-making, emergency operation and execution, and team communication and collaboration, as well as in the total composite score (all P < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe observation group achieved significantly higher compliance rates across all four key CPR quality metrics-compression depth, compression rate, chest recoil, and bag-valve-mask ventilation-compared with the control group (all P < 0.001).
“Post-training assessment of CPR quality indicators revealed that the observation group achieved significantly higher compliance rates across all four key metrics—compression depth, compression rate, chest recoil, and bag-valve-mask ventilation—compared with the control group (all P < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Anne QCPR real-time feedback system provides valid and accurate measurements of CPR quality indicators.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe effect sizes for the 3-month simulation scores ranged from 0.314 to 0.381, indicating moderate-to-large effects.
“The effect sizes (r) ranged from 0.314 to 0.381, indicating moderate-to-large effects and meaningful intergroup differences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataStatistically significant group-by-time interaction effects were observed for theoretical knowledge, CPR performance, and defibrillation scores (all P < 0.001).
“In all three domains, statistically significant interaction effects were observed (all P < 0.001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe generalized eta-squared values for CPR (0.252) and defibrillation (0.292) indicated large effect sizes, exceeding the medium effect for theoretical knowledge (0.092).
“Notably, the generalized eta-squared (Ges) values for CPR (0.252) and defibrillation (0.292) indicated large effect sizes, substantially exceeding the medium effect observed for theoretical knowledge (0.092).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe HeartCode BLS model confers demonstrable advantages in knowledge acquisition, psychomotor skill development, sustained integrative clinical competence, and a more positive learning experience.
“Collectively, these findings indicate that the HeartCode BLS model confers demonstrable advantages not only in knowledge acquisition and psychomotor skill development but also in fostering sustained integrative clinical competence and a more positive learning experience.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe HeartCode model not only accelerates short-term skill acquisition but also improves mid-term skill retention.
“indicating that the HeartCode model not only accelerates short-term skill acquisition but also improves mid-term skill retention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe skill gains observed in the present study closely parallel the mechanisms of real-time feedback.
“The skill gains observed in the present study closely parallel these mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAll training was delivered by eight AHA-certified BLS instructors, two of whom were dedicated solely to outcome assessment and did not participate in teaching.
“All training was delivered by eight American Heart Association (AHA)-certified BLS instructors, two of whom were dedicated solely to outcome assessment and did not participate in teaching.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBLS proficiency is a core clinical competency and a cornerstone of professional identity formation for nursing students.
“For nursing students, BLS proficiency is both a core clinical competency and a cornerstone of professional identity formation (2)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] Cruess, 2016, Amending miller’s pyramid to include professional identity formation., Acad Med source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningHow Miller's pyramid can be operationalized within integrated instructional systems such as HeartCode BLS to systematically enhance nursing students' multilevel competence remains insufficiently examined.
“However, how this framework can be operationalized within integrated instructional systems such as HeartCode BLS, which combines online theoretical learning, simulation practice, and automated feedback, to systematically enhance nursing students’ multilevel competence remains insufficiently examined.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll simulations were conducted on the same high-fidelity manikin; each simulation was limited to 10 min and followed by a 15-min structured debriefing; instructor prompts were fully scripted and identical facilitation language was used for all student teams.
“All simulations were conducted on the same high-fidelity manikin; each simulation was strictly limited to 10 min and was followed by a 15-min structured debriefing. Instructor prompts were fully scripted, and identical facilitation language was used for all student teams.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe HeartCode platform achieves a uniformly standardized training experience through digital delivery, ensuring that each learner receives equivalent knowledge exposition and skill demonstrations while its feedback mechanisms remain unaffected by inter-instructor variability, thereby securing comparability of training outcomes.
“The HeartCode platform, by contrast, achieves a uniformly standardized training experience through digital delivery, ensuring that each learner receives equivalent knowledge exposition and skill demonstrations while its feedback mechanisms remain unaffected by inter-instructor variability, thereby securing comparability of training outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe model is practical and scalable for undergraduate nursing programs and for the orientation of newly recruited nurses.
“These observations suggest that the model is practical and scalable for undergraduate nursing programs and for the orientation of newly recruited nurses”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe model is particularly well-suited to large-scale deployment, for instance, as a substitute for conventional group-based instruction in nursing schools or in the orientation of newly hired nurses, where it can meaningfully alleviate faculty workload and enhance training efficiency.
“The model is particularly well-suited to large-scale deployment, for instance, as a substitute for conventional group-based instruction in nursing schools or in the orientation of newly hired nurses, where it can meaningfully alleviate faculty workload and enhance training efficiency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe same instructor team taught both groups, and instructors were not informed of the study's primary hypothesis regarding the superiority of the new model.
“The same instructor team taught both groups, so as to minimize instructor-related bias, and the instructors were not informed of the study’s primary hypothesis regarding the superiority of the new model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataRandom allocation sequence was generated by an independent research assistant using a computer random-number generator, and allocation concealment was ensured using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes opened in strict enrolment order after baseline data collection.
“The random allocation sequence was generated by an independent research assistant using a computer random-number generator, and allocation concealment was ensured using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes that were opened in strict enrolment order by an on-site assistant only after baseline data collection had been completed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningExisting studies have largely assessed single methods in isolation, providing inadequate evidence on whether a theoretically grounded, integrated model can concurrently and durably improve theoretical performance, skill execution, and long-term clinical application.
“Existing studies have largely assessed single methods in isolation, providing inadequate evidence on whether a theoretically grounded, integrated model can concurrently and durably improve theoretical performance, skill execution, and long-term clinical application”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe effectiveness of HeartCode requires corroboration in multicenter settings.
“the effectiveness of HeartCode requires corroboration in multicenter settings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTen Cate and colleagues have argued for the addition of a fifth, apex tier termed "Trusted," which represents educators' confidence in trainees to independently assume clinical responsibility.
“Ten Cate and colleagues have argued for the addition of a fifth, apex tier termed “Trusted,” which represents educators’ confidence in trainees to independently assume clinical responsibility (7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Cate, 2021, Entrustment decision making: extending miller’s pyramid., Acad Med source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe study planned to enroll at least 110 nursing students per group to ensure statistical power.
“To ensure statistical power, the study planned to enroll at least 110 nursing students per group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenBefore the study, all instructors completed a standardized 4-h calibration session covering the study protocol, Miller's pyramid framework, HeartCode BLS platform operation, and structured debriefing.
“Before the study, all instructors completed a standardized 4-h calibration session covering the study protocol, the Miller’s pyramid framework, operation of the HeartCode BLS platform, and structured debriefing, in order to ensure instructional consistency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe observation group's reliance on the HeartCode platform implies that technical disruptions, such as network outages or device-calibration issues, could potentially interfere with the training process; no such incidents were reported in the present study.
“Moreover, the observation group’s reliance on the HeartCode platform implies that technical disruptions, such as network outages or device-calibration issues, could potentially interfere with the training process; although no such incidents were reported in the present study”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe study employed a single-center design, and the sample was drawn exclusively from one nursing institution, which may constrain the external generalizability of the findings.
“First, the study employed a single-center design, and the sample was drawn exclusively from one nursing institution, which may constrain the external generalizability of the findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe sustained advantage observed in the present study may derive from two complementary mechanisms: repeated engagement with key skill modules fostering more durable motor memory, and holistic training integrating knowledge, skills, and clinical decision-making promoting deeper understanding and more reliable memory retrieval.
“The sustained advantage observed in the present study may derive from two complementary mechanisms: first, the HeartCode platform enables repeated engagement with key skill modules throughout the training period, thereby fostering more durable motor memory; second, the model deliberately integrates knowledge, skills, and clinical decision-making within unified scenarios, and such holistic training”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe study was not blinded, such that assessors' awareness of group allocation may have introduced measurement bias; concurrently, students exposed to a novel instructional format may have manifested a Hawthorne effect, with heightened engagement and performance.
“Additionally, the study was not blinded, such that assessors’ awareness of group allocation may have introduced measurement bias; concurrently, students exposed to a novel instructional format may have manifested a Hawthorne effect, with heightened engagement and performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThis model may represent a practical and scalable strategy for modernizing undergraduate nursing emergency training.
“This model may represent a practical and scalable strategy for modernizing undergraduate nursing emergency training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataBaseline characteristics and pre-training BLS-related theoretical and skill scores did not differ significantly between groups (P > 0.05).
“Comparisons of baseline characteristics between the two nursing student groups, including educational background, gender, age, and pre-training BLS-related theoretical and skill scores, revealed no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05), confirming comparability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe structured, technology-enhanced instructional model exerted a particularly pronounced influence on psychomotor skill development, where greater room for improvement existed compared to cognitive knowledge acquisition.
“This pattern suggests that the structured, technology-enhanced instructional model exerted a particularly pronounced influence on psychomotor skill development, where greater room for improvement existed compared to cognitive knowledge acquisition (Table 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe Miller's-pyramid-based HeartCode BLS model exhibits clear advantages in standardization, reproducibility, and cost-effectiveness.
“From the perspectives of clinical relevance and implementation, the Miller’s-pyramid-based HeartCode BLS model exhibits clear advantages in standardization, reproducibility, and cost-effectiveness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Traditional BLS instruction depends heavily on instructor expertise and on-site equipment, rendering educational quality and outcomes vulnerable to variability in faculty proficiency and facility resources.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll skill evaluations were conducted in a simulated environment, and learners' actual performance in authentic clinical settings was not assessed.
“Third, all skill evaluations were conducted in a simulated environment, and learners’ actual performance in authentic clinical settings was not assessed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHigh-fidelity simulation enhances student confidence in performing BLS.
“high-fidelity simulation enhances student confidence in performing BLS (12)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Rushton, 2024, Basic life support training: Is student confidence enhanced by advanced levels of simulation?, Br J Nurs source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataFor the 3-month high-fidelity simulation, the team was the unit of analysis (23 teams per group).
“For the 3-month high-fidelity simulation, which assessed integrated team performance, the team was the unit of analysis (23 teams per group).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe Miller's Pyramid-based model not only enhanced individual skill proficiency but also effectively cultivated higher-order clinical competencies such as situational decision-making, adaptive resource allocation, and collaborative leadership within team-based emergency scenarios.
“These findings indicate that the Miller’s Pyramid-based model not only enhanced individual skill proficiency but also effectively cultivated higher-order clinical competencies such as situational decision-making, adaptive resource allocation, and collaborative leadership within team-based emergency scenarios (Figures 4A–D and Table 8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataA Miller's Pyramid-based HeartCode BLS teaching model was associated with significantly improved immediate learning outcomes, CPR quality, learner satisfaction, and mid-term integrated clinical performance among nursing students.
“A Miller’s Pyramid-based HeartCode BLS teaching model was associated with significantly improved immediate learning outcomes, CPR quality, learner satisfaction, and mid-term integrated clinical performance among nursing students.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The total instructional time difference of up to 90 min between groups does not materially confound the between-group comparison.
- Rests on an assumption: The Anne QCPR real-time feedback system provides valid and accurate measurements of CPR quality indicators.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEntrustment-based decision-making has been advanced as the operational core of does, reflecting supervisors' judgment of the independence with which a learner can perform a given task.
“entrustment-based decision-making has been advanced as the operational core of does, reflecting supervisors’ judgment of the independence with which a learner can perform a given task (7)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Cate, 2021, Entrustment decision making: extending miller’s pyramid., Acad Med source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe observation group's lower compression interruption times reflect superior compression continuity and overall procedural fluency under the new teaching model.
“reflecting superior compression continuity and overall procedural fluency under the new teaching model”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough the HeartCode model does not explicitly prescribe a spaced schedule, its modular architecture and repeatable access effectively permit learners to calibrate review cadence to their own mastery, thereby promoting memory consolidation.
“Although the HeartCode model does not explicitly prescribe a spaced schedule, its modular architecture and repeatable access effectively permit learners to calibrate review cadence to their own mastery, thereby promoting memory consolidation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe actual dropout rate was 3%, below the projected value, indicating sufficient statistical power.
“The actual dropout rate was 3% (below the projected value), indicating sufficient statistical power for this study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe total instructional time differed by no more than 90 min between groups (observation 810 min; control 720 min).
“The total instructional time differed by no more than 90 min between groups (observation group, 810 min; control group, 720 min).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe HeartCode BLS platform scaffolds self-paced acquisition of core BLS knowledge through interactive digital modules and scenario-based application exercises, thereby strengthening the "Knows" and "Knows How" tiers.
“The HeartCode BLS platform scaffolds self-paced acquisition of core BLS knowledge through interactive digital modules, reinforced by scenario-based application exercises, thereby effectively strengthening the “Knows” and “Knows How” tiers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisereasoningThe effect of such a model on learner satisfaction warrants further investigation.
“its effect on learner satisfaction likewise warrants further investigation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationMiller's pyramid stratifies clinical competence into four ascending levels: knows, knows how, shows how, and does.
“Miller’s pyramid, widely adopted in medical education, stratifies clinical competence into four ascending levels: knows, knows how, shows how, and does (7)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Cate, 2021, Entrustment decision making: extending miller’s pyramid., Acad Med source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe knowledge gains reported in the current study are consistent with, and appear more pronounced than, those of earlier work, a discrepancy plausibly attributable to the embedded immediate-assessment and targeted-feedback mechanisms within the HeartCode platform.
“The knowledge gains reported in the current study are consistent with, and appear more pronounced than, those of earlier work, a discrepancy plausibly attributable to the embedded immediate-assessment and targeted-feedback mechanisms within the HeartCode platform”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe satisfaction questionnaire demonstrated good internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.838.
“In the present study, the questionnaire demonstrated good internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.838.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe HeartCode BLS model aligns closely with Miller's pyramid framework, spanning the hierarchical continuum from "Knows" to "Does," and ultimately to the "Trusted" level.
“By coherently integrating digitally delivered self-paced learning with high-fidelity simulation feedback, the model aligns closely with Miller’s pyramid framework, spanning the hierarchical continuum from “Knows” to “Does,” and ultimately to the “Trusted” level”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationInternalization of professional values into professional identity (is) has been proposed as a higher aspiration than does alone.
“internalization of professional values into professional identity (is) has been proposed as a higher aspiration than does alone (2)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] Cruess, 2016, Amending miller’s pyramid to include professional identity formation., Acad Med source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe trial was registered on the National Medical Research Registration and Filing Information System (registration number MR3325078976; 17 November 2025).
“This trial was registered on the National Medical Research Registration and Filing Information System (registration number MR3325078976; 17 November 2025).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenHeartCode's modular architecture provides educational administrators with flexibility to configure hybrid (online-offline) content, and supports extension in line with contemporary interprofessional education trends.
“HeartCode’s modular architecture provides educational administrators with flexibility to configure hybrid (online-offline) content, and supports extension in line with contemporary interprofessional education trends.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The total instructional time difference of up to 90 min between groups does not materially confound the between-group comparison.
“the total instructional time could not be made exactly equal between groups, which is a common and largely unavoidable situation in educational-intervention research.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Anne QCPR real-time feedback system provides valid and accurate measurements of CPR quality indicators.
“data automatically recorded by the Anne QCPR real-time feedback system.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Traditional BLS instruction depends heavily on instructor expertise and on-site equipment, rendering educational quality and outcomes vulnerable to variability in faculty proficiency and facility resources.
“Traditional BLS instruction depends heavily on instructor expertise and on-site equipment, rendering educational quality and outcomes vulnerable to variability in faculty proficiency and facility resources.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The principal resources required, QCPR feedback-enabled manikins and AHA-certified instructors, form part of the standard configuration of teaching hospitals.
“the principal resources required, QCPR feedback-enabled manikins and AHA-certified instructors, form part of the standard configuration of teaching hospitals”
The paper relies on this without support.
Simulation-based assessment correlates positively with clinical competence to some degree.
“Although simulation-based assessment correlates positively with clinical competence to some degree”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Limitation contradicts stated assessor blinding
MajorThe limitations say assessors knew group allocation, whereas the blinding section says both assessors remained unaware of it throughout.
“Additionally, the study was not blinded, such that assessors’ awareness of group allocation may have introduced measurement bias;”
“The two assessors were fully blinded: the two AHA-certified instructors who conducted the 1-week skills assessment and the 3-month simulation assessment did not participate in any teaching and remained unaware of group allocation throughout.”
Observation-group baseline knowledge scores differ between tables
MinorTables 3 and 4 give different pre-training theoretical means and standard deviations for the same observation group of 114 students.
“| Knowledge test score | 62.72 ± 9.11 | 62.59 ± 8.89 | 0.108 | 0.914 |”
“| Theoretical score | Obs | 114 | 62.68 ± 9.06 | 74.29 ± 9.94 | 1878.024 | <0.001 | 25.051 | <0.001 | 410.696 | <0.001 | 0.092 |”
Abstract reports the analyzed sample as the randomized sample
MinorThe abstract says 229 students were enrolled and assigned to groups, but the participant account says 236 were randomized and 229 remained for the final analysis.
“229 eligible nursing students were enrolled and assigned to a control group (n = 115) or an observation group (n = 114).”
“236 students were randomized (118 per group). During the 3-month follow-up, 7 students were lost to follow-up (4 in the observation group and 3 in the control group, owing to internship-schedule conflicts or sick leave), leaving 229 students (114 in the observation group and 115 in the control group) for the final analysis.”
Enrollment target is below the adjusted sample-size requirement
MinorThe paper calculates an adjusted requirement of approximately 125 students per group, then says enrolling at least 110 per group would ensure statistical power. The final groups of 114 and 115 also fall below that adjusted requirement.
“Adjustsamplesize=(92×1.15)/(1−0.15)≈125”
“To ensure statistical power, the study planned to enroll at least 110 nursing students per group.”
Cites
Panchal, A. R., Bartos, J. A., Cabañas, J. G., Donnino, M. W., Drennan, I. R., Hirsch, K. G., Kudenchuk, P. J., Kurz, M. C., Lavonas, E. J., Morley, P. T., et al. (2020) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000916 · Cited by 2,195 · see citing works
Merchant, R. M., Topjian, A., Panchal, A. R., Cheng, A., Aziz, K., Berg, K. M., Lavonas, E. J., Magid, D. J., & On behalf of the Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support, P. B. A. A. L. S. (2020) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000918 · Cited by 1,167 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…based on authoritative references, including the 2020 American Heart Scoring was performed using a rubric developed with reference to the 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care and related clinical practice standards (20).”
Amending miller’s pyramid to include professional identity formation.
Cruess, R. L., Cruess, S. R., & Steinert, Y. (2016) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000913 · Cited by 558 · see citing works
Alharbi, A., Nurfianti, A., Mullen, R., McClure, J., & Miller, W. H. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-06080-z · Cited by 274 · see citing works
The development and psychometric testing of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale
Levett-Jones, T. L., McCoy, M., Lapkin, S., Noble, D., Hoffman, K., Dempsey, J., Arthur, C., & Roche, J. (2011) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.01.004 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Entrustment decision making: extending miller’s pyramid.
ten Cate, O., Carraccio, C., Damodaran, A., Gofton, W., Hamstra, S. J., Hart, D. E., Richardson, D., Ross, S., Schultz, K., Warm, E. J., et al. (2021) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000003800 · Cited by 160 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Miller’s pyramid offers a means to bridge this gap, spanning knows and knows how via knowledge transmission, shows how through simulation, and does and entrustment, within authentic clinical contexts (7).”
InfluentialDaneshfar, M., & Moonaghi, H. K. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-07790-8 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Training interval in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Oermann, M. H., Krusmark, M. A., Kardong-Edgren, S., Jastrzembski, T. S., & Gluck, K. A. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226786 · Cited by 71 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Oermann et al. demonstrated that low-dose, high-frequency Resuscitation Quality Improvement (RQI) programs, delivering quarterly CPR practice sessions combined with real-time feedback, effectively maintain and even enhance students’ compression and ventilation skills (27, 28).”
Demırtaş, A., Güvenç, G., Aslan, Ö., Ünver, V., Başak, T., & Kaya, C. (2020) · Australasian Emergency Care · doi:10.1016/j.auec.2020.08.005 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
The effects of an online basic life support course on undergraduate nursing students’ learning.
Tobase, L., Peres, H. H. C., Gianotto-Oliveira, R., Smith, N., Polastri, T. F., & Timerman, S. (2017) · International Journal of Medical Education · doi:10.5116/ijme.5985.cbce · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Tseng, L.-P., Hou, T., Huang, L., & Ou, Y. (2021) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-021-00744-7 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Hsieh, M.-J., Bhanji, F., Chiang, W.-C., Yang, C.-W., Chien, K.-L., & Ma, M. H.-M. (2016) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.08.021 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Khaledi, A., Ghafouri, R., Anboohi, S. Z., Nasiri, M., & Ta'atizadeh, M. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05230-7 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Basic life support training for undergraduate nursing students: an integrative review.
Dick-Smith, F., Power, T., Martinez-Maldonado, R., & Elliott, D. (2021) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102957 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Fijačko, N., Masterson Creber, R., Metličar, Š., Strnad, M., Greif, R., Štiglic, G., & Skok, P. (2024) · JMIR Serious Games · doi:10.2196/56037 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Charlier, N., Van Der Stock, L., & Iserbyt, P. (2020) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102714 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Lactona, I. D., & Suryanto (2021) · Journal of Public Health Research · doi:10.4081/jphr.2021.2208 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Ghaderi, M. S., Malekzadeh, J., Mazloum, S., & Pourghaznein, T. (2023) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03951-1 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Kuvaki, B., & Özbilgin, Ş. (2018) · Türk anesteziyoloji ve reanimasyon derneği dergisi · doi:10.5152/tjar.2018.25986 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Ranjbar, F., Nia, H. S., Shiri, M., & Rahmatpour, P. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05533-9 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Mukurunge, E., Nyoni, C. N., & Hugo, L. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05264-x · Cited by 16 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Despite abundant research on BLS teaching innovations, most studies compare isolated technologies or media without a unifying theoretical framework, leaving interventions to target only fragments of competence (8).”
Development and evaluation of nursing clinical practice education using m-learning.
Kim, S., & Im, M. (2024) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare12020206 · Cited by 14 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This study adopts the classic Kirkpatrick Four-Level Evaluation Model (18, 19) as its overall assessment framework.”
Mather, C., & McCarthy, R. (2021) · PubMed · doi:10.7748/ns.2021.e11564 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Oermann, M. H., VanRiel, Y. M., Wagner, R. W., Whittington, K. D., Baker, M., Stieve, D. E., Crane, P. C., & Vermeesch, C. A. (2024) · Resuscitation Plus · doi:10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100782 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Shin, S., Hong, E., Lee, I., & Kim, J. (2024) · International Nursing Review · doi:10.1111/inr.12942 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Liu, H., Huang, H., Li, M., Mao, P., Zhang, A., Sun, Y., Liu, Z., Tao, H., Zhao, S., Xia, Y., et al. (2025) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1155/jonm/8624274 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Bodur, G., Turhan, Z., Altun, Y. E., Kilicaslan, K., Ali̇kan, B., Özer, F., & Can, G. (2025) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104486 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Peinado‐Molina, R. A., Martínez‐Vázquez, S., Paulano-Martínez, J. F., Hernández‐Martínez, A., & Martínez‐Galiano, J. M. (2023) · Nursing Reports · doi:10.3390/nursrep13010028 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Soares, R. V., Pedrosa, R. B. D. S., Sandars, J., & Cecilio-Fernandes, D. (2025) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2024.2427735 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Theories and Practices in Learning and Assessment for Postgraduate Medical Education: A Review
Ismail, O. M., Said, U. N., El-Omar, O., & Bhutta, M. A. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.74160 · Cited by 5 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These additions reposition Miller’s pyramid from an assessment tool into a theoretical blueprint spanning knowledge transmission, behavioral internalization, and clinical entrustment (9).”
Extended reality technologies in adult basic life support education: a scoping review.
Fijačko, N., Metličar, Š., Janžekovič, B., Abella, B. S., Nadkarni, V. M., Chang, T. P., & Greif, R. (2025) · Resuscitation Plus · doi:10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100927 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Torbergsen, H., Paulsby, T. E., Haugan, G., & Utvær, B. K. S. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-07729-z · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Yoon, Y. S., Baek, W., Jo, H., Hong, C., & Ji, Y. (2026) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2026.104775 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Pujalte-Jesús, M. J., Leal-Costa, C., & Díaz Agea, J. L. (2021) · International Emergency Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ienj.2020.100951 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Fenzi, G., Alemán-Jiménez, C., López-Ferrándiz, L., Leal‐Costa, C., & Agea, J. L. D. (2024) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1155/jonm/9470402 · Cited by 4 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Fenzi et al. demonstrated that medical and nursing students participating in interprofessional CPR training using the Self-Learning Methodology in Simulated Environments (MAES) exhibited gains in teamwork, communication, and both technical and non-technical competencies (39).”
Miri, K., Sardashti, A., Moradi, S., Naseri, A., & Mirzaei, A. (2025) · Resuscitation Plus · doi:10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101089 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Basic life support training: Is student confidence enhanced by advanced levels of simulation?
Rushton, M., & Pilkington, R. (2024) · British Journal of Nursing · doi:10.12968/bjon.2024.33.9.411 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Koyuncu, A., Pehlivan, K., Yava, A., Çetindaş, K., Karacan, H. İ., & Ulaşli, Z. (2024) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106273 · Cited by 2 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Koyuncu et al. reported that autonomous practice with low-cost pillow manikins significantly improved psychomotor performance in BLS, although such tools inherently lack real-time feedback functionality (37).”
Ocampo Cervantes, A. B., Greif, R., Castro Delgado, R., López López, C. A., Carrión García, E., & Pardo Ríos, M. (2026) · Atención Primaria · doi:10.1016/j.aprim.2025.103413 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Natarajan, J., Rajjoub, R. A., Tawfik, W. K., Gangadharan, S., Sreekala, R. P., Buraiki, H. A. A., Shibli, A. M. K. A., Seshan, V., & Kavumpurath, J. (2026) · SAGE Open Nursing · doi:10.1177/23779608251407767 · Cited by 2 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Natarajan et al. have reported that the flipped classroom enhances CPR knowledge and skills (25), yet its integration with HeartCode’s digital feedback may yield synergistic effects.”
Kumar, A. P., Padmavathi, R., Maheshkumar, K., Omprakash, A., Mani, P. K. C., Sathiyasekaran, B. W., & Maruthy, K. N. (2026) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/84339 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Xu, W., Cheng, F., Li, Z., & Wang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Quzhou City People's Hospital (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Yajun
- ORCID
- Xu, Wenxian
- Venue
- Frontiers in Medicine
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2026-07-08
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- 1863479-1863479
- ISSN
- 2296-858X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC13388170
- OpenAlex
- W7167722973
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- Miller's pyramid, basic life support training, nursing students, CPR quality, simulation-based assessment, Kirkpatrick evaluation, student satisfaction, emergency decision-making, team communication, bag-mask ventilation, compression-to-ventilation ratio
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-29.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-29.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review