The Problems With Burnout Research
Abstract
Burnout among physicians and physicians-in-training is well established as a potential threat to the health and well-being of health care providers and patients. However, there are myriad problems with current burnout research and its ongoing measurement that threaten the validity of the conclusions. For example, researchers have used differing ways of defining and measuring burnout. Those who have used the Maslach Burnout Inventory vary in recommended use of the instrument and cutoff scores. As a result, the authors suggest that the term “burnout” may be misused and recommend some reconsideration of the meaning of burnout. The measurement and discussion of burnout have strong implications for interventions and policy alike. In this article, the authors review the problems with burnout research and ask important questions about the future directions of research efforts. The authors recommend a consistent measurement approach and perhaps moving toward a focus on physician wellness from a positive psychology perspective.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The approach avoided different ways to define and measure burnout.
“Our approach avoided different ways to define and measure burnout, which is the main limitation of current burnout research [97].”
From Prevalence of Burnout in Medical and Surgical Residents: A Meta-Analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [97]
Burnout, depression, and moral injury overlap but are not identical.
“burnout, depression, and moral injury overlap but are not identical”
From Individual-Focused Interventions for Physician Burnout: A Meta-Analysis of Mindfulness, Coaching, and Peer Support (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
The MBI has been used with many cutoffs and ad hoc burnout thresholds.
“the MBI has been used with many cutoffs and ad hoc “burnout” thresholds”
From Individual-Focused Interventions for Physician Burnout: A Meta-Analysis of Mindfulness, Coaching, and Peer Support (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
Current measures may not fully capture the complexity of burnout.
“current measures may not fully capture this complexity [12,13]”
From Individual-Focused Interventions for Physician Burnout: A Meta-Analysis of Mindfulness, Coaching, and Peer Support (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
Cites
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910 · see citing works
Understanding the burnout experience: Recent research and its implications for psychiatry
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20311 · Cited by 4,200 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Physician burnout: contributors, consequences and solutions
West, C. P., Dyrbye, L. N., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2018) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/joim.12752 · Cited by 2,768 · see citing works
Prevalence of Burnout in Medical and Surgical Residents: A Meta-Analysis
Low, Z. X., Yeo, K. A., Sharma, V. K., Leung, G. K., McIntyre, R. S., Guerrero, A., Lu, B., Sin Fai Lam, C. C., Tran, B. X., Nguyen, L. H., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16091479 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
“Our approach avoided different ways to define and measure burnout, which is the main limitation of current burnout research [97].”
MethodFactors associated with burnout syndrome in surgeons: a systematic review
Galaiya, R., Kinross, J., & Arulampalam, T. (2020) · The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England · doi:10.1308/rcsann.2020.0040 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Williamson, K., Lank, P. M., Cheema, N., Hartman, N., Lovell, E. O., & Emergency Medicine Education Research Alliance (EMERA) (2018) · Journal of Graduate Medical Education · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-18-00155.1 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Brady, K. J. S., Ni, P., Sheldrick, R. C., Trockel, M. T., Shanafelt, T. D., Rowe, S. G., Schneider, J. I., & Kazis, L. E. (2020) · Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s41687-020-00204-x · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Klein, A., Taieb, O., Xavier, S., Baubet, T., & Reyre, A. (2020) · EXPLORE · doi:10.1016/j.explore.2019.09.002 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Dillon, E. C., Stults, C. D., Deng, S., Martinez, M., Szwerinski, N., Koenig, P. T., Gregg, L., Cobb, J. K., Mahler, E., Frosch, D. L., et al. (2022) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-021-07134-4 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Braun, S. E., Kinser, P. A., & Rybarczyk, B. (2019) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/tbm/iby059 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
An interprofessional group intervention to promote faculty well-being: a randomized clinical trial
Hata, S. R., Berkowitz, L. R., James, K., & Simpkin, A. L. (2022) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1097/ceh.0000000000000404 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Khan, A., Kim, D., Atwater, R., & Reddy, R. (2025) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina62010039 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Eckleberry-Hunt, J., Kirkpatrick, H., & Barbera, T.
- Affiliations
- Beaumont Health (US)
- Genesys Regional Medical Center (US)
- St Vincent Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eckleberry-Hunt, Jodie
- ORCID
- Kirkpatrick, Heather
- Venue
- Academic Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 367-370
- ISSN
- 1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2746652460
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 36.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
- Keywords
- burnout, physician well-being, Maslach Burnout Inventory, burnout measurement, cut-off values, positive psychology
- MeSH terms
- Burnout, Professional, Health Personnel, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Physicians, Research, Epidemiologic Measurements, Workplace
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review