Cited by 97Health and Medical Research ImpactsHealth Policy Implementation ScienceInnovations in Medical Education

OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium: linking a clinical and translational science institute with a community-based distributive medical education model

Open access
Shenkman, Elizabeth, Hurt, Myra, Hogan, William, Carrasquillo, Olveen, Smith, Steven, Brickman, Andrew, Nelson, David·2018·Academic Medicine

Abstract

Problem: Developing a national pragmatic clinical trial infrastructure is central to understanding the effectiveness of interventions applied under usual conditions and where people receive health care. To address this challenge, three Florida universities—the University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Florida State University (with its community-based distributive medical education model), and the University of Miami—created (2010–2013) a statewide consortium, the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium, to support the conduct of pragmatic clinical trials and provide mentored research experiences for medical and graduate students in real-world practice settings. Approach: OneFlorida has four programs, which report to a steering committee with membership from each partner, community members, and the state Medicaid agency and Department of Health to ensure shared governance. The Clinical Research Program provides support to conduct research in the network and uses champions to engage community clinicians. The Citizen Scientist Program has community members who provide input on health topics of importance to them, study design, recruitment and retention strategies, and the interpretation of findings. The Data Trust Program contains electronic health record and health care claims data for 10.6 million Floridians. The Minority Education Program, in collaboration with three historically black colleges and universities, offers minority junior faculty mentoring in pragmatic clinical trials and implementation science. Outcomes: OneFlorida has implemented 27 studies with diverse patient populations and in diverse community practice settings. Next Steps: To identify evidence-based best practices from the clinical trials conducted in the network, foster their implementation, and expand research training opportunities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/acm.0000000000002029

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium aggregates and harmonizes clinical data from 12 healthcare organizations caring for nearly 15 million Floridians in 22 hospitals and 914 clinical practices across all 67 Florida counties.

    “The OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium is one of nine clinical data research networks funded by PCORI and aggregates, which harmonizes clinical data from 12 healthcare organizations that care for nearly 15 million Floridians in 22 hospitals and 914 clinical practices across all 67 counties of the state of Florida.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]Chan WV Pearson TA NHLBI Implementation Science Workgroup Literature Review: Evidence-Based Implementation Strategies Bethesda, Md National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 2013

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shenkman, E., Hurt, M., Hogan, W., Carrasquillo, O., Smith, S., Brickman, A., & Nelson, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • is chief scientific officer, Florida Hospital, Orlando, Florida.
  • Health Choice Network (US)
Corresponding author
Shenkman, Elizabeth
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
2018-03
Volume
93
Issue
3
Pages
451-455
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2765619636
Cited by
97
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5
FWCI
4.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001427, 1ot2od025285-01, UL1TR002736)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
pragmatic trials, research consortium, health insurance claims, historically Black colleges and universities, implementation science, research training, shared governance, community participation
MeSH terms
Academies and Institutes, Intersectoral Collaboration, Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Florida, Humans, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Translational Research, Biomedical, Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review