The Clinical Microsystems Clerkship at University of California, San Francisco: Integrating Clinical Skills and Health Systems Improvement for Early Medical Students
Open accessAbstract
Problem: Medical educators recognize that partnering actively with health system leaders closes significant health care experience, quality, and outcomes gaps. Medical schools have explored innovations training physicians to care for both individual patients and populations while improving systems of care. Yet, early medical student education fails to include systems improvement as foundational skills. When health systems science is taught, it is often separated from core clinical skills. Approach: The Clinical Microsystems Clerkship at the University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, launched in 2016, integrates clinical skills training with health systems improvement from the start of medical school. Guided by communities of practice and workplace learning principles, it embeds first-year and second-year students in longitudinal clinical microsystems with physician coaches and interprofessional clinicians one day per week. Students learn medical history, physical examination, patient communication, interprofessional teamwork, and health systems improvement. Assessments include standardized patient examinations and improvement project reports. Program outcome measures include student satisfaction and attitudes, clinical skills performance, and evidence of systems improvement learning, including dissemination and scholarship. Outcomes: Students reported high satisfaction (first-year, 4.10; second-year, 4.29, on a scale of 1–5) and value (4.14) in their development as physicians. Clinical skills assessment accuracy was high (70%–96%). Guided by interprofessional clinicians across 15 departments, students completed 258 improvement projects in 3 health systems (academic, safety net, Veterans Affairs). Sample projects reduced disparities in hypertension, improved opiate safety, and decreased readmissions. Graduating students reported both clinical skills and health systems knowledge as important to physician success, patient experience, and clinical outcomes (4.73). Most graduates discussed their projects in residency applications (85%) and disseminated related papers and presentations (54%). Next Steps: Integrating systems improvement, interprofessional teamwork, and clinical skills training can redefine early medical student education. Health system perspectives, long-term outcomes, and sustainability merit further exploration.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The session duration is a long session.
“| Coaching process related | Session duration | Long session | [68,98,109] |”
From Coaching in undergraduate and graduate medical education: a scoping review of success factors, barriers, and outcomes (2026) · cites this paper as [68]
The Approach section (Clinical skills curriculum and assessments; page unavailable) describes approximately one half-day per instructional week of clinical-skills practice and longitudinal feedback from physician coaches. It does not specify the duration of an individual coaching session, so it does not establish that coaching sessions are long. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSatisfaction is a coaching measure.
“| Coaching measure | Satisfaction | [41,68] |”
From Coaching in undergraduate and graduate medical education: a scoping review of success factors, barriers, and outcomes (2026) · cites this paper as [68]
The Abstract’s Outcomes section reports student satisfaction, and the Outcomes section treats it as part of the clerkship’s program evaluation. The paper describes physician coaches, but the satisfaction measure is not identified as a measure of coaching specifically. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredCareer readiness/transition to residency is a student outcome.
“| Coaching outcomes | Student | Career readiness/transition to residency | [31,33,68] |”
From Coaching in undergraduate and graduate medical education: a scoping review of success factors, barriers, and outcomes (2026) · cites this paper as [68]
The Outcomes section (Single class in-depth analysis; page not available) reports that 85% of graduates listed their project in residency applications, a student outcome related to the transition to residency. It does not assess career readiness or preparedness for residency; the reported perception of preparedness concerns clerkships instead. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIncreasing QI is a student outcome.
“| Coaching outcomes | Student | Increasing QIb | [68,107] |”
From Coaching in undergraduate and graduate medical education: a scoping review of success factors, barriers, and outcomes (2026) · cites this paper as [68]
The Abstract’s Outcomes section reports that students, guided by clinicians, completed 258 improvement projects, and the Approach describes feedback on their quality-improvement work (page unavailable). This supports quality-improvement activity as a student outcome, but the paper does not establish an increase in students’ QI ability or attribute such an increase specifically to coaching. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
Bloom, B. S. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.5.646-a · Cited by 3,732 · see citing works
Cruess, R. L., Cruess, S. R., Boudreau, J. D., Snell, L., & Steinert, Y. (2015) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000700 · Cited by 1,038 · see citing works
Competency Is Not Enough: Integrating Identity Formation Into the Medical Education Discourse
Jarvis-Selinger, S., Pratt, D. D., & Regehr, G. (2012) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3182604968 · Cited by 668 · see citing works
Berwick, D. M., & Finkelstein, J. A. (2010) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3181ead779 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Advancing the Learning Health System
McGinnis, J. M., Fineberg, H. V., & Dzau, V. J. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp2103872 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Achieving the Desired Transformation
Holmboe, E. S., & Batalden, P. B. (2015) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000779 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Gonzalo, J. D., Lucey, C. R., Wolpaw, T. M., & Chang, A. (2016) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001346 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citationThe State of Quality Improvement Teaching in Medical Schools: A Systematic Review
Peiris-John, R. J., Selak, V., Robb, G., Kool, B., Wells, S. J., Sadler, L. C., & WISE, M. R. (2020) · Journal of surgical education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.01.003 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 9 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Revolutionizing Health Education: The Dynamic Shift of E-Learning Platforms
Adeyele, T. K. (2024) · Education and human development · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1004562 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Reddi, S., & Javidi, D. (2025) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.82015 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Satisfaction with Clinical Clerkship and Its Determinants Among Korean Medicine Students
Lee, I., Hwang, E.-H., Kwon, K., & Lee, H.-Y. (2025) · Journal of pharmacopuncture · doi:10.3831/kpi.2025.28.2.108 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Lau, C. Y., Pierluissi, E., Callaghan, K. C., Chang, A., & Choi, L. W. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-07579-9 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationMukherjee, B., Pfleeger, J., Custodio, H., Roca, M. R., Khalsa, G., & Clanton, C. (2026) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.1080/10872981.2026.2687304 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
A multi-residency elective to address well-being as a systems issue
Ritchie, A., Ciccariello, C., Teherani, A., & Thomas, L. R. (2024) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2024.2322140
Self-citationServey, J. T., Kleber, H. G., Chi, I., & Barry, E. S. (2026) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-025-02614-2
- Authors
- Chang, A., Pierluissi, E., Cornes, S., Ishizaki, A., Teherani, A., Davis, J. A., Hauer, K. E., & Lucey, C. R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- San Francisco General Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chang, Anna
- Venue
- Academic Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2022-10-03
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-61
- ISSN
- 1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-808X
- PMC
- PMC9780045
- OpenAlex
- W4304693721
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 1.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Academic Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Keywords
- clinical microsystems, early medical education, clinical skills training, interprofessional education, communities of practice, workplace learning, medical students, improvement projects, hospital readmission, standardized patient assessment
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Clerkship, Clinical Competence, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Humans, Learning, San Francisco, Students, Medical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review