Deep Learning Model for Automated Trainee Assessment During High-Fidelity Simulation
Abstract
Problem: Implementation of competency-based medical education has necessitated more frequent trainee assessments. Use of simulation as an assessment tool is limited by access to trained examiners, cost, and concerns with interrater reliability. Developing an automated tool for pass/fail assessment of trainees in simulation could improve accessibility and quality assurance of assessments. This study aimed to develop an automated assessment model using deep learning techniques to assess performance of anesthesiology trainees in a simulated critical event. Approach: The authors retrospectively analyzed anaphylaxis simulation videos to train and validate a deep learning model. They used an anaphylactic shock simulation video database from an established simulation curriculum, integrating a convenience sample of 52 usable videos. The core part of the model, developed between July 2019 and July 2020, is a bidirectional transformer encoder. Outcomes: The main outcome was the F1 score, accuracy, recall, and precision of the automated assessment model in analyzing pass/fail of trainees in simulation videos. Five models were developed and evaluated. The strongest model was model 1 with an accuracy of 71% and an F1 score of 0.68. Next Steps: The authors demonstrated the feasibility of developing a deep learning model from a simulation database that can be used for automated assessment of medical trainees in a simulated anaphylaxis scenario. The important next steps are to (1) integrate a larger simulation dataset to improve the accuracy of the model; (2) assess the accuracy of the model on alternative anaphylaxis simulations, additional medical disciplines, and alternative medical education evaluation modalities; and (3) gather feedback from education leadership and clinician educators surrounding the perceived strengths and weaknesses of deep learning models for simulation assessment. Overall, this novel approach for performance prediction has broad implications in medical education and assessment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI-assisted assessment tools could offer more objective and consistent feedback.
“For instance, AI-based simulation technologies could provide students more opportunities to practice in a controlled environment, and AI-assisted assessment tools could offer more objective and consistent feedback [19].”
From Reimagining Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Undergraduate Medical Education in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [19]
AI-based simulation technologies could provide students more opportunities to practice in a controlled environment.
“For instance, AI-based simulation technologies could provide students more opportunities to practice in a controlled environment, and AI-assisted assessment tools could offer more objective and consistent feedback [19].”
From Reimagining Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Undergraduate Medical Education in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [19]
Cites
Reading digits in natural images with unsupervised feature learning
Netzer, Y. (2024) · doi:10.57702/e7wwo0zk · Cited by 4,261 · see citing works
Competency-Based Postgraduate Medical Education: Past, Present and Future
ten Cate, O. (2017) · PubMed · doi:10.3205/zma001146 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Identifying Surgical Actions and Measuring Performance
Khalid, S., Goldenberg, M. G., Grantcharov, T., Taati, B., & Rudzicz, F. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1664 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Self-citationChiu, M., Tarshis, J., Antoniou, A., Bosma, T. L., Burjorjee, J. E., Cowie, N., Crooks, S., Doyle, K., Dubois, D., Everett, T. C., et al. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie · doi:10.1007/s12630-016-0733-8 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-citationNunnink, L., Foot, C. L., Venkatesh, B., Corke, C. F., Saxena, M. K., Lucey, M., & Jones, M. (2014) · Critical Care and Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/s1441-2772(23)01445-x · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Simulation-based assessment in anesthesia: an international multicentre validation study
Collaborators, F. T. M., Everett, T. C., McKinnon, R. J., et al. (2019) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie · doi:10.1007/s12630-019-01488-4 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A scoping review of artificial intelligence in medical education: BEME Guide No. 84
Gordon, M., Daniel, M., Ajiboye, A., Uraiby, H., Xu, N. Y., Bartlett, R., Hanson, J., Haas, M., Spadafore, M., Grafton-Clarke, C., et al. (2024) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2024.2314198 · Cited by 543 · see citing works
Jacobs, S. M., Lundy, N. N., Issenberg, S. B., & Chandran, L. (2023) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/50903 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Siddiqui, A., Zhao, Z., Pan, C., Rudzicz, F., & Everett, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Siddiqui, Asad
- Venue
- Academic Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2023-06-05
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1274-1277
- ISSN
- 1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-808X
- OpenAlex
- W4379600149
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical Council of Canada (MCC-8/1920, Asad Siddiqui)
- Society for Technology in Anesthesia (Asad Siddiqui)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- automated assessment, high-fidelity simulation, competency-based medical education, medical education assessment
- MeSH terms
- High Fidelity Simulation Training, Deep Learning, Anaphylaxis, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review