The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Conceptual Framework for the Use of Illness Narratives in Medical Education
Abstract
The use of narratives, including physicians’ and patients’ stories, literature, and film, is increasingly popular in medical education. There is, however, a need for an overarching conceptual framework to guide these efforts, which are often dismissed as “soft” and placed at the margins of medical school curricula. The purpose of this article is to describe the conceptual basis for an approach to patient-centered medical education and narrative medicine initiated at the University of Michigan Medical School in the fall of 2003. This approach, the Family Centered Experience, involves home visits and conversations between beginning medical students and patient volunteers and their families and is aimed at fostering humanism in medicine. The program incorporates developmental and learning theory, longitudinal interactions with individuals with chronic illness, reflective learning, and small-group discussions to explore the experience of illness and its care. The author describes a grounding of this approach in theories of empathy and moral development and clarifies the educational value that narratives bring to medical education. Specific pedagogical considerations, including use of activities to create “cognitive disequilibrium” and the concept of transformative learning, are also discussed and may be applied to narrative medicine, professionalism, multicultural education, medical ethics, and other subject areas in medical education that address individuals and their health care needs in society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phenomenological research methods
Moustakas, C. (1994) · doi:10.4135/9781412995658 · Cited by 13,919
Cited by
The Devil is in the Third Year: A Longitudinal Study of Erosion of Empathy in Medical School
Hojat, M., Vergare, M. J., Maxwell, K., Brainard, G., Herrine, S. K., Isenberg, G. A., Veloski, J., & Gonnella, J. S. (2009) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3181b17e55 · Cited by 1,628
Wald, H. S., Borkan, J. M., Taylor, J. S., Anthony, D., & Reis, S. P. (2012) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e31823b55fa · Cited by 391
Birden, H., Glass, N., Wilson, I., Harrison, M., Usherwood, T., & Nass, D. (2013) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2013.789132 · Cited by 306
Mass media interventions for reducing mental health-related stigma
Clement, S., Lassman, F., Barley, E., Evans-Lacko, S., Williams, P., Yamaguchi, S., Slade, M., Rüsch, N., & Thornicroft, G. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009453.pub2 · Cited by 284
Humanities in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Literature Review
Ousager, J., & Johannessen, H. (2010) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3181dd226b · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumagai, A. K.
- Venue
- Academic Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 653-658
- ISSN
- 1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085992226
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Conceptual Framework for the Use of Illness Narratives in Medical Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/acm.0b013e3181782e17
- The paper
- Kumagai, A. K. (2008). A Conceptual Framework for the Use of Illness Narratives in Medical Education. Academic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3181782e17
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.