The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Perspective: Guidelines for Reporting Team-Based Learning Activities in the Medical and Health Sciences Education Literature
Open accessAbstract
Medical and health sciences educators are increasingly employing team-based learning (TBL) in their teaching activities. TBL is a comprehensive strategy for developing and using self-managed learning teams that has created a fertile area for medical education scholarship. However, because this method can be implemented in a variety of ways, published reports about TBL may be difficult to understand, critique, replicate, or compare unless authors fully describe their interventions.The authors of this article offer a conceptual model and propose a set of guidelines for standardizing the way that the results of TBL implementations are reported and critiqued. They identify and articulate the seven core design elements that underlie the TBL method and relate them to educational principles that maximize student engagement and learning within teams. The guidelines underscore important principles relevant to many forms of small-group learning. The authors suggest that following these guidelines when writing articles about TBL implementations should help standardize descriptive information in the medical and health sciences education literature about the essential aspects of TBL activities and allow authors and reviewers to successfully replicate TBL implementations and draw meaningful conclusions about observed outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tracking e-learning through published papers: A systematic review
Rodrigues, H., Almeida, F., Figueiredo, V., & Lopes, S. L. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.007 · Cited by 399
Phillips, A. C., Lewis, L. K., McEvoy, M. P., Galipeau, J., Glasziou, P., Moher, D., Tilson, J. K., & Williams, M. T. (2016) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0759-1 · Cited by 312
Ghasemi, M. R., Moonaghi, H. K., & Heydari, A. (2020) · Korean Journal of Medical Education · doi:10.3946/kjme.2020.159 · Cited by 112
The DoCTRINE Guidelines: Defined Criteria To Report INnovations in Education
Blanco, M., Prunuske, J., DiCorcia, M., Learman, L. A., Mutcheson, B., & Huang, G. C. (2022) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000004634 · Cited by 67
Survey Research Reporting in Radiology Publications: A Review of 2017 to 2018
Shankar, P. R., & Maturen, K. E. (2019) · Journal of the American College of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2019.07.012 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Haidet, P., Levine, R. E., Parmelee, D. X., Crow, S., Kennedy, F., Kelly, P. A., Perkowski, L., Michaelsen, L., & Richards, B. F.
- Venue
- Academic Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 292-299
- ISSN
- 1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996504237
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 97.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perspective: Guidelines for Reporting Team-Based Learning Activities in the Medical and Health Sciences Education Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/acm.0b013e318244759e
- The paper
- Haidet, P., Levine, R. E., Parmelee, D. X., Crow, S., Kennedy, F., Kelly, P. A., Perkowski, L., Michaelsen, L., & Richards, B. F. (2012). Perspective: Guidelines for Reporting Team-Based Learning Activities in the Medical and Health Sciences Education Literature. Academic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e318244759e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.