Cited by 92Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

To Improve Substance Use Disorder Prevention, Treatment and Recovery: Engage the Family

Ventura, Alicia S., Bagley, Sarah M.·2017·Journal of Addiction Medicine

Abstract

Approximately 21 million people in the United States have a substance use disorder (SUD); the number of family members impacted by a loved one's SUD is exponentially greater. Affected family members of individuals with SUDs are at high risk for developing chronic medical and psychiatric health conditions, are high utilizers of the health care system, and have high health care expenditures. Family members play a central role in the lives of many individuals with SUDs; information given to family members can have a significant impact on persons with addiction and therefore the SUD treatment that an individual might receive. Evidence-based interventions targeting affected family members have been shown to: improve health outcomes for all family members, result in better addiction treatment outcomes, and prevent adolescent substance use. Despite mounting evidence, the health care system has been hesitant to engage families in a meaningful way. Health care providers should consider how implicit and explicit assumptions about the role of family members in SUD development, treatment, and recovery may contribute to this underlying reluctance. Antiquated policies and procedures that alienate family members should be modified (e.g., limiting phone access). Family members have a right to receive professional treatment and to be educated about the difference between mutual/peer support and evidence-based treatment options. Despite the potential for family members to move the needle on the country's current addiction crisis they remain an underutilized resource. A paradigm shift will be required to get the current SUD care continuum to adopt a family-centric model.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/adm.0000000000000331

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ventura, A. S., & Bagley, S. M.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Ventura, Alicia S.
Venue
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Published
2017-09
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
339-341
ISSN
  • 1932-0620 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-3227
OpenAlex
W2743520116
Cited by
92
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Addiction Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
substance use disorders, family involvement, family members of people with addiction, family intervention, addiction treatment outcomes, recovery, adolescent substance use prevention, barriers to care, health policy, self-help groups, health care expenditure
MeSH terms
Family, Family Therapy, Humans, United States, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review