Cited by 33Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and ManagementOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

“You’re Always Jumping Through Hoops”: Journey Mapping the Care Experiences of Individuals With Opioid Use Disorder-associated Endocarditis

Open access
Bearnot, Benjamin, Mitton, Julian A.·2020·Journal of Addiction Medicine

Abstract

Objectives: Serious infectious complications of opioid use disorder (OUD), and specifically endocarditis, are becoming more common in the US. Individuals with OUD-associated endocarditis require long periods of complex medical care, often face recurrent addiction- and infection-related complications, and have dismal clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to perform journey mapping analysis to capture common trajectories and patterns of care for people with OUD-associated endocarditis. Methods: This was an analysis of qualitative semi-structured interviews of individuals who received care for OUD-associated endocarditis. Interviews were conducted among individuals receiving care at a single academic healthcare system in Boston, Massachusetts. Ten participants meeting DSM-5 criteria for at least mild OUD and a culture-positive diagnosis of endocarditis who had previously completed care for OUD-associated endocarditis were recruited from inpatient and ambulatory settings. Details of participant's care episodes were extracted and visualized in an iterative journey mapping process. A grounded theory approach was then used to identify shared themes and care patterns among participants’ journey maps. Results: Common patterns of care included early addiction treatment and intensive outpatient care preceding periods without rehospitalization, while leaving outpatient care and return to drug use often directly preceded rehospitalization. Participants frequently left care by choice and proactively reengaged with care. Conclusions: Journey mapping is a novel, patient-centered approach to capturing the care experiences and trajectories of a patient population experiencing significant stigma, who engage with the healthcare system in unexpected and fragmented ways. For individuals with OUD-associated endocarditis, we identified critical moments to support and engage patients to prevent return to drug use and rehospitalization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/adm.0000000000000648

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Following inductive content analysis, data presented in journey maps highlight common themes and systematic barriers to include in an initial map, which is then used to obtain additional cross validation and feedback for revision.

    “Following inductive content analysis, data presented in journey maps highlight common themes and systematic barriers to include in an initial map, which is then used to obtain additional cross validation and feedback for revision (Bearnot & Mitton, 2020; Vears & Gillam, 2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. The discovery of grounded theory: Strat Qual Res. 1967; 101: 158.
  2. Rawson A, Duncan E, Jones C. The truth about customer experience. Harvard Bus Rev. 2013; 91(9): 90– 8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bearnot, B., & Mitton, J. A.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Bearnot, Benjamin
Venue
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Published
2020-03-05
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
494-501
ISSN
  • 1932-0620 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-3227
OpenAlex
W3010252432
Cited by
33
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Addiction Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (K12DA043490)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
opioid use disorder, infective endocarditis, journey mapping, care pathways, patient care experience, hospital readmission, addiction treatment, outpatient care, stigma, patient engagement, care fragmentation
MeSH terms
Boston, Endocarditis, Humans, Massachusetts, Opioid-Related Disorders, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review