Cited by 103Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Opioid UseCognitive Functions and Memory

Everyday Executive Functioning in Chronic Pain: Specific Deficits in Working Memory and Emotion Control, Predicted by Mood, Medications, and Pain Interference

Baker, Katharine S., Gibson, Stephen, Georgiou-Karistianis, Nellie, Roth, Robert M., Giummarra, Melita J.·2016·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

Objectives People with chronic pain may experience impairments in high-level cognitive skills, particularly executive functions. Such impairments are not adequately measured in most clinical pain management settings yet could be a key influence on everyday functioning. We administered a well-validated, well-normed self-report measure to determine which aspects of executive functioning are compromised in the daily experience of patients with chronic pain, and whether these are associated with pain severity, medications, and mood. Materials and methods Sixty-three patients attending a multidisciplinary pain management clinic, and 66 pain-free age-matched and sex-matched controls, completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Adult version (BRIEF-A). The BRIEF-A measures 9 aspects of executive function: Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control, Initiate, Self-Monitor, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Task Monitor, and Organization of Materials. Patients completed a battery of mood and pain-related measures. Results Profile analysis revealed that patients with chronic pain reported significantly greater overall executive function impairments than controls. The patients showed greatest impairments on Working Memory and Emotional Control subscales, with more than half scoring in the clinically elevated range. A significant proportion of the variance in these scores was explained by total medication detriment (but not opioids alone), negative emotional states, and pain inter…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000313

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baker, K. S., Gibson, S., Georgiou-Karistianis, N., Roth, R. M., & Giummarra, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Caulfield Hospital (AU)
  • National Ageing Research Institute (AU)
  • School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University
  • Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
  • Baker, Katharine S.
  • Gibson, Stephen
  • Giummarra, Melita J.
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2016-08
Volume
32
Issue
8
Pages
673-680
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2325186687
Cited by
103
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Monash University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
chronic pain, executive function, working memory, emotional control, Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, multidisciplinary pain management, analgesics, opioid side effects, mood, pain interference, daily functioning
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Psychological Tests, Regression Analysis, Young Adult, Executive Function, Emotional Intelligence, Self Report, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review