Cited by 7Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Perceived Injustice and Anger in Fibromyalgia With and Without Comorbid Mental Health Conditions: A Hebrew Validation of the Injustice Experience Questionnaire

Gilam, Gadi, Silvert, Jemma, Raev, Sheer, Malka, Din, Gluzman, Inbar, Rush, Melissa, Elkana, Odelia, Aloush, Valerie·2024·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

Objectives Perceived injustice (PI), assessed by the Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ), is an important trigger of anger. Both PI and anger are associated with adverse chronic pain outcomes, and with comorbid mental health severity. We aimed examined the roles of PI and anger in mediating pain across Fibromyalgia patients, with and without comorbid anxiety/depression (FM+A/D, FM-A/D, respectively), as well as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and pain-free controls (PFC). We hypothesized the highest levels of PI, anger, and pain in FM+A/D patients, followed by FM-A/D, RA, and PFC, thus also validating a Hebrew version of the IEQ. Methods We translated the IEQ using the forward-backward method and collected data online. Based on self-reported anxiety/depression, the sample comprised 66 FM+A/D patients, 64 FM-A/D, 34 RA, and 32 PFCs. Assessments included the IEQ, state and trait anger, pain intensity, anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophizing. The structure and reliability of the Hebrew IEQ were examined using factor analysis and Cronbach alpha. Bootstrapped-based modeling was used to test the roles of state and trait anger in mediating and moderating the relationship between PI and pain intensity. Results We confirmed a one-factor structure of the IEQ, with excellent reliability. FM+A/D patients demonstrated the highest scores in all measures. Within this group, trait anger moderated the mediating effect of state anger in the relationship between PI and pain intensity. Dis…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ajp.0000000000001204

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gilam, G., Silvert, J., Raev, S., Malka, D., Gluzman, I., Rush, M., Elkana, O., & Aloush, V.
Affiliations
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Academic College of Tel Aviv-Yafo (IL)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
  • Gilam, Gadi
  • Silvert, Jemma
  • Rush, Melissa
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2024-02-12
Volume
40
Issue
6
Pages
356-366
ISSN
  • 0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-5409
OpenAlex
W4391755123
Cited by
7
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
perceived injustice, anger, fibromyalgia, anxiety comorbidity, comorbid depression, rheumatoid arthritis, pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, Hebrew translation, trait anger, state anger, mediation, moderation
MeSH terms
Adult, Anger, Anxiety, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Depression, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity, Catastrophization, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review