Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 262

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trends in Use of Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain Among Individuals With Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders: The TROUP Study

Open access
Edlund, Mark J., Martin, Bradley C., Devries, Andrea, Fan, Ming-Yu, Brennan Braden, Jennifer, Sullivan, Mark D.·2010·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Use of prescription opioids for chronic pain is increasing, as is abuse of these medications, though the nature of the link between these trends is unclear. These increases may be most marked in patients with mental health (MH) and substance use disorders (SUDs). We analyzed trends between 2000 and 2005 in opioid prescribing among individuals with noncancer pain conditions (NCPC), with and without MH and SUDs. METHODS: Secondary data analysis of longitudinal administrative data from 2 dissimilar populations: a national, commercially insured population and Arkansas Medicaid enrollees. We examined these opioid outcomes: (1) rates of any prescription opioid use in the past year, (2) rates of chronic use of prescription opioids (greater than 90 d in the past year), (3) mean days supply of opioids, (4) mean daily opioid dose in morphine equivalents, and (5) percentage of total opioid dose that was Schedule II opioids. RESULTS: In 2000, among individuals with NCPC, chronic opioid use was more common among those with a MH or SUD than among those without in commercially insured (8% vs. 3%, P<0.001) and Arkansas Medicaid (20% vs. 13%, P<0.001) populations. Between 2000 and 2005, in commercially insured, rates of chronic opioid use increased by 34.9% among individuals with an MH or SUD and 27.8% among individuals without these disorders. In Arkansas Medicaid chronic, opioid use increased by 55.4% among individuals with an MH or SUD and 39.8% among those without. DISCUSSION: Chronic use of prescription opioids for NCPC is much higher and growing faster in patients with MH and SUDs than in those without these diagnoses. Clinicians should monitor the use of prescription opioids in these vulnerable groups to determine whether opioids are substituting for or interfering with appropriate MH and substance abuse treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ajp.0b013e3181b99f35

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 262

Metadata

Authors
Edlund, M. J., Martin, B. C., Devries, A., Fan, M.-Y., Brennan Braden, J., & Sullivan, M. D.
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2010-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035630713
Cited by
262
References
7
FWCI
12.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in Use of Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain Among Individuals With Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders: The TROUP Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/ajp.0b013e3181b99f35
The paper
Edlund, M. J., Martin, B. C., Devries, A., Fan, M.-Y., Brennan Braden, J., & Sullivan, M. D. (2010). Trends in Use of Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain Among Individuals With Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders: The TROUP Study. The Clinical Journal of Pain. https://doi.org/10.1097/ajp.0b013e3181b99f35

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.