Cited by 113Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsMedical Malpractice and Liability IssuesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Frequency and Type of Situational Awareness Errors Contributing to Death and Brain Damage: A Closed Claims Analysis

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Situational awareness errors may play an important role in the genesis of patient harm. The authors examined closed anesthesia malpractice claims for death or brain damage to determine the frequency and type of situational awareness errors. METHODS: Surgical and procedural anesthesia death and brain damage claims in the Anesthesia Closed Claims Project database were analyzed. Situational awareness error was defined as failure to perceive relevant clinical information, failure to comprehend the meaning of available information, or failure to project, anticipate, or plan. Patient and case characteristics, primary damaging events, and anesthesia payments in claims with situational awareness errors were compared to other death and brain damage claims from 2002 to 2013. RESULTS: Anesthesiologist situational awareness errors contributed to death or brain damage in 198 of 266 claims (74%). Respiratory system damaging events were more common in claims with situational awareness errors (56%) than other claims (21%, P < 0.001). The most common specific respiratory events in error claims were inadequate oxygenation or ventilation (24%), difficult intubation (11%), and aspiration (10%). Payments were made in 85% of situational awareness error claims compared to 46% in other claims (P = 0.001), with no significant difference in payment size. Among 198 claims with anesthesia situational awareness error, perception errors were most common (42%), whereas comprehension errors (29%) and projection errors (29%) were relatively less common. CONCLUSIONS: Situational awareness error definitions were operationalized for reliable application to real-world anesthesia cases. Situational awareness errors may have contributed to catastrophic outcomes in three quarters of recent anesthesia malpractice claims.Situational awareness errors resulting in death or brain damage remain prevalent causes of malpractice claims in the 21st century.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aln.0000000000001661

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 2002, The role of non-technical skills in anaesthesia: A review of current literature., Br J Anaesth, 88, 418, 10.1093/bja/88.3.418 · DOI
  2. 2010, Beyond monitoring: Distributed situation awareness in anaesthesia., Br J Anaesth, 105, 83, 10.1093/bja/aeq137 · DOI
  3. 2008, Teamwork and error in the operating room: Analysis of skills and roles., Ann Surg, 247, 699, 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181642ec8 · DOI
  4. 2003, Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: Analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective., Ann Surg, 237, 460, 10.1097/01.SLA.0000060680.92690.E9 · DOI
  5. 2008, The influence of non-technical performance on technical outcome in laparoscopic cholecystectomy., Surg Endosc, 22, 68, 10.1007/s00464-007-9346-1 · DOI
  6. 2015, The non-technical skills used by anaesthetic technicians in critical incidents reported to the Australian Incident Monitoring System between 2002 and 2008., Anaesth Intensive Care, 43, 512, 10.1177/0310057X1504300416 · DOI
  7. 2016, Situation awareness errors in anesthesia and critical care in 200 cases of a critical incident reporting system., BMC Anesthesiol, 16, 4
  8. 2012, Exploring situational awareness in diagnostic errors in primary care., BMJ Qual Saf, 21, 30, 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000310 · DOI
  9. 2014, Situation awareness and interruption handling during medication administration., West J Nurs Res, 36, 891, 10.1177/0193945914533426 · DOI
  10. 2014, Nurse-surgeon object transfer: Video analysis of communication and situation awareness in the operating theatre., Int J Nurs Stud, 51, 1195, 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.01.007 · DOI
  11. 1999, The American Society of Anesthesiologists Closed Claims Project: What have we learned, how has it affected practice, and how will it affect practice in the future?, Anesthesiology, 91, 552, 10.1097/00000542-199908000-00030 · DOI
  12. 1989, Standard of care and anesthesia liability., JAMA, 261, 1599, 10.1001/jama.1989.03420110075027 · DOI
  13. 1995, Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems., Human Factors, 37, 32, 10.1518/001872095779049543 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 2015, Situation awareness misconceptions and misunderstandings., J Cogn Eng Decis Mak, 9, 4, 10.1177/1555343415572631 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 1996, Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation., Aviat Space Environ Med, 67, 507
  16. 1981, The medical malpractice closed claims study conducted by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners., Conn Med, 45, 91
  17. 1977, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data., Biometrics, 33, 159, 10.2307/2529310 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 2006, Trends in anesthesia-related death and brain damage: A closed claims analysis., Anesthesiology, 105, 1081, 10.1097/00000542-200612000-00007 · DOI
  19. 2006, Injury and liability associated with monitored anesthesia care: A closed claims analysis., Anesthesiology, 104, 228, 10.1097/00000542-200602000-00005 · DOI
  20. 2014, Massive hemorrhage: A report from the anesthesia closed claims project., Anesthesiology, 121, 450, 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000369 · DOI
  21. 2005, Management of the difficult airway: A closed claims analysis., Anesthesiology, 103, 33, 10.1097/00000542-200507000-00009 · DOI
  22. 2013, Operating room fires: A closed claims analysis., Anesthesiology, 118, 1133, 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828afa7b · DOI
  23. 2015, Decision-making and cognitive strategies., Simul Healthc, 10, 133, 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000093 · DOI
  24. 2013, From theory to practice: Designing for situation awareness to transform shovel operator interfaces, reduce costs, and increase safety., CIM Journal, 4, 1517
  25. 1991, Effect of outcome on physician judgments of appropriateness of care., JAMA, 265, 1957, 10.1001/jama.1991.03460150061024 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 113

Metadata

Authors
Schulz, C. M., Burden, A., Posner, K. L., Mincer, S. L., Steadman, R., Wagner, K. J., & Domino, K. B.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Schulz, Christian M.
Venue
Anesthesiology
Published
2017-08
Volume
127
Issue
2
Pages
326-337
ISSN
0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2608681048
Cited by
113
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6
FWCI
16.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anesthesiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002319)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025014)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Social Sciences › Law › Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
patient death, brain damage, anesthesia errors, perceptual errors, comprehension errors, projection error, respiratory system damage, difficult intubation, aspiration
MeSH terms
Anesthesia, Awareness, Brain Injuries, Clinical Competence, Female, Humans, Insurance Claim Review, Male, Malpractice, Middle Aged, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review