Cited by 185Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesMachine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Development and Validation of a Deep Neural Network Model for Prediction of Postoperative In-hospital Mortality

Open access
Lee, Christine K., Hofer, Ira, Gabel, Eilon, Baldi, Pierre, Cannesson, Maxime·2018·Anesthesiology

Abstract

Editor’s Perspective: What We Already Know about This Topic: What This Article Tells Us That Is New: Background: The authors tested the hypothesis that deep neural networks trained on intraoperative features can predict postoperative in-hospital mortality. Methods: The data used to train and validate the algorithm consists of 59,985 patients with 87 features extracted at the end of surgery. Feed-forward networks with a logistic output were trained using stochastic gradient descent with momentum. The deep neural networks were trained on 80% of the data, with 20% reserved for testing. The authors assessed improvement of the deep neural network by adding American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification and robustness of the deep neural network to a reduced feature set. The networks were then compared to ASA Physical Status, logistic regression, and other published clinical scores including the Surgical Apgar, Preoperative Score to Predict Postoperative Mortality, Risk Quantification Index, and the Risk Stratification Index. Results: In-hospital mortality in the training and test sets were 0.81% and 0.73%. The deep neural network with a reduced feature set and ASA Physical Status classification had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88 to 0.93). The highest logistic regression area under the curve was found with a reduced feature set and ASA Physical Status (0.90, 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.93). The Risk Stratification Index had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, at 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94 to 0.99). Conclusions: Deep neural networks can predict in-hospital mortality based on automatically extractable intraoperative data, but are not (yet) superior to existing methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aln.0000000000002186

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 185

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 2015, Neural networks., Reviews, 61, 85
  2. 2003, The principled design of large-scale recursive neural network architectures—dag-rnns and the protein structure prediction problem., Journal of Machine Learning Research, 4

Metadata

Authors
Lee, C. K., Hofer, I., Gabel, E., Baldi, P., & Cannesson, M.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Cannesson, Maxime
Venue
Anesthesiology
Published
2018-10
Volume
129
Issue
4
Pages
649-662
ISSN
0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2800777678
Cited by
185
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 7
FWCI
13.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anesthesiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR013912)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM117622)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
deep neural network, mortality prediction, ASA physical status, surgical risk scores, logistic regression, feature reduction
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Predictive Value of Tests, ROC Curve, Neural Networks, Computer, Hospital Mortality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review