The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Development and Validation of a Deep Neural Network Model for Prediction of Postoperative In-hospital Mortality
Open accessAbstract
Editor’s Perspective: What We Already Know about This Topic: What This Article Tells Us That Is New: Background: The authors tested the hypothesis that deep neural networks trained on intraoperative features can predict postoperative in-hospital mortality. Methods: The data used to train and validate the algorithm consists of 59,985 patients with 87 features extracted at the end of surgery. Feed-forward networks with a logistic output were trained using stochastic gradient descent with momentum. The deep neural networks were trained on 80% of the data, with 20% reserved for testing. The authors assessed improvement of the deep neural network by adding American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification and robustness of the deep neural network to a reduced feature set. The networks were then compared to ASA Physical Status, logistic regression, and other published clinical scores including the Surgical Apgar, Preoperative Score to Predict Postoperative Mortality, Risk Quantification Index, and the Risk Stratification Index. Results: In-hospital mortality in the training and test sets were 0.81% and 0.73%. The deep neural network with a reduced feature set and ASA Physical Status classification had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88 to 0.93). The highest logistic regression area under the curve was found with a reduced feature set and ASA Physical Status (0.90, 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.93). The Risk Stratification Index had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, at 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94 to 0.99). Conclusions: Deep neural networks can predict in-hospital mortality based on automatically extractable intraoperative data, but are not (yet) superior to existing methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although various research projects are focusing on CDSS in the ICU, translation into the clinical routine is lagging far behind [15,46-49].”
From Clinical requirements of future patient monitoring in the intensive care unit: qualitative study (2019) · cites this paper as [47]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 185
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 2015, Neural networks., Reviews, 61, 85
- 2003, The principled design of large-scale recursive neural network architectures—dag-rnns and the protein structure prediction problem., Journal of Machine Learning Research, 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, C. K., Hofer, I., Gabel, E., Baldi, P., & Cannesson, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cannesson, Maxime
- Venue
- Anesthesiology
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 649-662
- ISSN
- 0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6148401
- OpenAlex
- W2800777678
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 13.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Anesthesiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR013912)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM117622)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- deep neural network, mortality prediction, ASA physical status, surgical risk scores, logistic regression, feature reduction
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Predictive Value of Tests, ROC Curve, Neural Networks, Computer, Hospital Mortality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review