Cited by 44Anesthesia and Pain ManagementMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsPain Management and Opioid Use

Intraoperative Pain during Cesarean Delivery under Neuraxial Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Charles, Elinor A., Carter, Hester, Stanford, Susanna, Blake, Lindsay, Eley, Victoria, Carvalho, Brendan, Sultan, Pervez, Kua, Justin +1 more·2025·Anesthesiology

Abstract

Background: Neuraxial anesthesia is the definitive standard technique for cesarean delivery; however, pain during cesarean delivery may be underreported. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the incidence of patient-reported intraoperative pain during cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia. Methods: A literature search of databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Central Register of Controlled Trials) was conducted. Search topics included terminology concerning cesarean delivery, neuraxial anesthesia, pain, and incidence. Meta-analyses were performed to calculate pooled incidences of patient-reported pain and how mode of anesthesia influenced the incidence of patient-reported pain, with included articles assessed for risk of bias. Results: A total of 2,061 abstracts were screened; 34 articles were included (21 randomized studies and 13 nonrandomized studies). The crude incidence of intraoperative pain under neuraxial anesthesia was 10.8% (1,229 of 11,351 patients), and the pooled incidence was 17% (95% CI, 13 to 22%; 1,229 of 11,351 patients). Patients who received spinal anesthesia had the lowest pooled incidence of pain of 14% (95% CI, 10.0 to 20.0%; 662 of 8,002 patients), and those who received epidural top-up had the highest pooled incidence of pain of 33% (95% CI, 17.0 to 54.0%; 253 of 1,395 patients). Risk of bias assessments showed high risk of bias in half of the included studies. Conclusions: Patient-reported pain during cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia is common, with spinal and combined spinal–epidural anesthesia reporting a lower incidence of pain than epidural anesthesia. Intraoperative pain can have significant psychologic impact for patients and medicolegal implications for providers. Further prospective studies are required to characterize and understand the impact of patient experiences of pain and develop techniques to reduce this complication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aln.0000000000005486

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Charles, E. A., Carter, H., Stanford, S., Blake, L., Eley, V., Carvalho, B., Sultan, P., Kua, J., & O’Carroll, J. E.
Affiliations
  • University College Hospital (GB)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
Anesthesiology
Published
2025-04-04
Volume
143
Issue
1
Pages
156-167
ISSN
  • 0275-665X (ISSN-L)
  • 0003-3022
  • 1528-1175
OpenAlex
W4409152942
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 15
FWCI
36.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obstetric Anesthesia Digest (publishedVersion)
  • Anesthesiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
intraoperative pain, cesarean section, neuraxial anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, epidural anesthesia, epidural top-up, patient-reported pain, combined spinal-epidural anesthesia
MeSH terms
Anesthesia, Epidural, Anesthesia, Obstetrical, Anesthesia, Spinal, Cesarean Section, Female, Humans, Intraoperative Complications, Pregnancy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review