Intraoperative Pain during Cesarean Delivery under Neuraxial Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Neuraxial anesthesia is the definitive standard technique for cesarean delivery; however, pain during cesarean delivery may be underreported. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the incidence of patient-reported intraoperative pain during cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia. Methods: A literature search of databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Central Register of Controlled Trials) was conducted. Search topics included terminology concerning cesarean delivery, neuraxial anesthesia, pain, and incidence. Meta-analyses were performed to calculate pooled incidences of patient-reported pain and how mode of anesthesia influenced the incidence of patient-reported pain, with included articles assessed for risk of bias. Results: A total of 2,061 abstracts were screened; 34 articles were included (21 randomized studies and 13 nonrandomized studies). The crude incidence of intraoperative pain under neuraxial anesthesia was 10.8% (1,229 of 11,351 patients), and the pooled incidence was 17% (95% CI, 13 to 22%; 1,229 of 11,351 patients). Patients who received spinal anesthesia had the lowest pooled incidence of pain of 14% (95% CI, 10.0 to 20.0%; 662 of 8,002 patients), and those who received epidural top-up had the highest pooled incidence of pain of 33% (95% CI, 17.0 to 54.0%; 253 of 1,395 patients). Risk of bias assessments showed high risk of bias in half of the included studies. Conclusions: Patient-reported pain during cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia is common, with spinal and combined spinal–epidural anesthesia reporting a lower incidence of pain than epidural anesthesia. Intraoperative pain can have significant psychologic impact for patients and medicolegal implications for providers. Further prospective studies are required to characterize and understand the impact of patient experiences of pain and develop techniques to reduce this complication.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neuraxial anesthesia is considered the gold standard technique for cesarean delivery, and patient-reported pain is more common with general anesthesia compared with spinal or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.
“Neuraxial anesthesia is considered the gold standard technique for cesarean delivery, and patient-reported pain is more common with general anesthesia compared to spinal or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.57”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nedergaard, H. K., Duch, P., Wikkelso, A. J., Abildgren, M. L., Lund-Olesen, J., Wildgaard, K., & Ekelund, K. (2026) · International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2026.104882 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Fagan, J., Dufour, S., Duet, S., Downs, E., Siddaiah, H., Viswanath, O., Shekoohi, S., & Kaye, A. (2026) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s579920
- Authors
- Charles, E. A., Carter, H., Stanford, S., Blake, L., Eley, V., Carvalho, B., Sultan, P., Kua, J., & O’Carroll, J. E.
- Affiliations
- University College Hospital (GB)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Venue
- Anesthesiology
- Published
- 2025-04-04
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 156-167
- ISSN
- 0275-665X (ISSN-L)
- 0003-3022
- 1528-1175
- OpenAlex
- W4409152942
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 15
- FWCI
- 36.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obstetric Anesthesia Digest (publishedVersion)
- Anesthesiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Keywords
- intraoperative pain, cesarean section, neuraxial anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, epidural anesthesia, epidural top-up, patient-reported pain, combined spinal-epidural anesthesia
- MeSH terms
- Anesthesia, Epidural, Anesthesia, Obstetrical, Anesthesia, Spinal, Cesarean Section, Female, Humans, Intraoperative Complications, Pregnancy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review