The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk Associated with Preoperative Anemia in Noncardiac Surgery: A Single-center Cohort Study
Open accessAbstract
Background: Preoperative anemia is an important risk factor for perioperative red blood cell transfusions and has been shown to be independently associated with adverse outcomes after noncardiac surgery. The objective of this observational study was to measure the prevalence of preoperative anemia and assess the relationship between preoperative anemia and postoperative mortality. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected on 7,759 consecutive noncardiac surgical patients at the University Health Network between 2003 and 2006. Preoperative anemia was defined as a hemoglobin concentration less than 12.0 g/dl for women and less than 13.0 g/dl for men. The unadjusted and adjusted relationship between preoperative anemia and mortality was assessed using logistic regression and propensity analyses. Results: Preoperative anemia was common and equal between genders (39.5% for men and 39.9% for women) and was associated with a nearly five-fold increase in the odds of postoperative mortality. After adjustment for major confounders using logistic regression, anemia was still associated with increased mortality (odds ratio, 2.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.57-3.41). This relationship was unchanged after elimination of patients with severe anemia and patients who received transfusions. In a propensity-matched cohort of patients, anemia was associated with increased mortality (odds ratio, 2.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-3.63). Conclusions: Anemia is a common condition in surgical patients and is independently associated with increased mortality. Although anemia increases mortality independent of transfusion, it is associated with increased requirement for transfusion, which is also associated with increased mortality. Treatment of preoperative anemia should be the focus of investigations for the reduction of perioperative risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care
Hébert, P. C., Wells, G., Blajchman, M. A., Marshall, J., Martin, C., Pagliarello, G., Tweeddale, M., Schweitzer, I., & Yetisir, E. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199902113400601 · Cited by 5,187
Cited by
Patient Blood Management: Recommendations From the 2018 Frankfurt Consensus Conference
Mueller, M. M., Van Remoortel, H., Meybohm, P., Aranko, K., Aubron, C., Burger, R., Carson, J. L., Cichutek, K., De Buck, E., Devine, D., et al. (2019) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.0554 · Cited by 632
Goodnough, L. T., Maniatis, A., Earnshaw, P., Benoni, G., Beris, P., Bisbe, E., Fergusson, D. A., Gombotz, H., Habler, O., Monk, T. G., et al. (2011) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aeq361 · Cited by 543
Patient blood management in Europe
Shander, A., Van Aken, H., Colomina, M. J., Gombotz, H., Hofmann, A., Krauspe, R., Lasocki, S., Richards, T., Slappendel, R., & Spahn, D. R. (2012) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aes139 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Beattie, W. S., Karkouti, K., Wijeysundera, D. N., & Tait, G.
- Venue
- Anesthesiology
- Published
- 2009-03-01
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 574-581
- ISSN
- 0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022004676
- Cited by
- 439
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk Associated with Preoperative Anemia in Noncardiac Surgery: A Single-center Cohort Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/aln.0b013e31819878d3
- The paper
- Beattie, W. S., Karkouti, K., Wijeysundera, D. N., & Tait, G. (2009). Risk Associated with Preoperative Anemia in Noncardiac Surgery: A Single-center Cohort Study. Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0b013e31819878d3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.