Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 343

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Assessment of the Ultrasonographic Measurement of Antral Area for Estimating Preoperative Gastric Content and Volume

Open access
Bouvet, Lionel, Mazoit, Jean-Xavier, Chassard, Dominique, Allaouchiche, Bernard, Boselli, Emmanuel, Benhamou, Dan·2011·Anesthesiology

Abstract

Background: This prospective observational study aimed to assess the feasibility and performance of the ultrasonographic measurement of antral cross-sectional area (CSA) for the preoperative assessment of gastric contents and volume in adult patients and for the diagnosis of risk stomach (defined by the presence of solid particles and/or gastric fluid volume >0.8 ml/kg). Methods: A preoperative ultrasonographic measurement of the antral CSA was performed for each patient by a physician (L.B.) blinded to the history of the patient. Immediately after tracheal intubation, an 18-French multiorifice Salem tube was inserted and gastric contents were aspirated in five different patient positions; during this time, the patient's epigastrium was massaged and the tube was moved backward and forward in the stomach. The relationship between the antral area and the volume of aspirated gastric contents was analyzed, as was the performance of ultrasonographic measurement of antral area for the diagnosis of risk stomach. Results: The measurement of antral CSA was performed on 180 of 183 patients. A significant positive relationship between antral CSA and aspirated fluid volume was found. The cutoff value of antral CSA of 340 mm(2) for the diagnosis of risk stomach was associated with a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 71%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the diagnosis of risk stomach was 90%. Conclusions: The ultrasonographic measurement of antral CSA could be an important help for the anesthesiologist in minimizing the risk of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents due to general anesthesia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aln.0b013e31820dee48

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 343

Metadata

Authors
Bouvet, L., Mazoit, J.-X., Chassard, D., Allaouchiche, B., Boselli, E., & Benhamou, D.
Venue
Anesthesiology
Published
2011-05-01
Volume
114
Issue
5
Pages
1086-1092
ISSN
0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989233164
Cited by
343
References
1
FWCI
15.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Assessment of the Ultrasonographic Measurement of Antral Area for Estimating Preoperative Gastric Content and Volume. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/aln.0b013e31820dee48
The paper
Bouvet, L., Mazoit, J.-X., Chassard, D., Allaouchiche, B., Boselli, E., & Benhamou, D. (2011). Clinical Assessment of the Ultrasonographic Measurement of Antral Area for Estimating Preoperative Gastric Content and Volume. Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0b013e31820dee48

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.