The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical Assessment of the Ultrasonographic Measurement of Antral Area for Estimating Preoperative Gastric Content and Volume
Open accessAbstract
Background: This prospective observational study aimed to assess the feasibility and performance of the ultrasonographic measurement of antral cross-sectional area (CSA) for the preoperative assessment of gastric contents and volume in adult patients and for the diagnosis of risk stomach (defined by the presence of solid particles and/or gastric fluid volume >0.8 ml/kg). Methods: A preoperative ultrasonographic measurement of the antral CSA was performed for each patient by a physician (L.B.) blinded to the history of the patient. Immediately after tracheal intubation, an 18-French multiorifice Salem tube was inserted and gastric contents were aspirated in five different patient positions; during this time, the patient's epigastrium was massaged and the tube was moved backward and forward in the stomach. The relationship between the antral area and the volume of aspirated gastric contents was analyzed, as was the performance of ultrasonographic measurement of antral area for the diagnosis of risk stomach. Results: The measurement of antral CSA was performed on 180 of 183 patients. A significant positive relationship between antral CSA and aspirated fluid volume was found. The cutoff value of antral CSA of 340 mm(2) for the diagnosis of risk stomach was associated with a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 71%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the diagnosis of risk stomach was 90%. Conclusions: The ultrasonographic measurement of antral CSA could be an important help for the anesthesiologist in minimizing the risk of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents due to general anesthesia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Darwiche, G., Almér, L. O., Björgell, O., Cederholm, C., & Nilsson, P. (1999) · Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine · doi:10.7863/jum.1999.18.10.673 · Cited by 131
Cited by
Silveira, S. Q., da Silva, L. M., de Campos Vieira Abib, A., de Moura, D. T. H., de Moura, E. G. H., Santos, L. B., Ho, A. M.-H., Nersessian, R. S. F., Lima, F. L. M., Silva, M. V., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Anesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111091 · Cited by 259
Van de Putte, P., Vernieuwe, L., Jerjir, A., Verschueren, L., Tacken, M., & Perlas, A. (2017) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aew435 · Cited by 176
Baettig, S. J., Filipovic, M. G., Hebeisen, M., Meierhans, R., & Ganter, M. T. (2023) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/anae.16117 · Cited by 59
Santos, L. B., Mizubuti, G. B., da Silva, L. M., Silveira, S. Q., Nersessian, R. S. F., Abib, A. D. C. V., Bellicieri, F. N., Lima, H. D. O., Ho, A. M.-H., dos Anjos, G. S., et al. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Anesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111668 · Cited by 43
Shi, Y., Dong, B., Dong, Q., Zhao, Z., & Yu, Y. (2021) · Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.jopan.2020.05.006 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Bouvet, L., Mazoit, J.-X., Chassard, D., Allaouchiche, B., Boselli, E., & Benhamou, D.
- Venue
- Anesthesiology
- Published
- 2011-05-01
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1086-1092
- ISSN
- 0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989233164
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Assessment of the Ultrasonographic Measurement of Antral Area for Estimating Preoperative Gastric Content and Volume. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/aln.0b013e31820dee48
- The paper
- Bouvet, L., Mazoit, J.-X., Chassard, D., Allaouchiche, B., Boselli, E., & Benhamou, D. (2011). Clinical Assessment of the Ultrasonographic Measurement of Antral Area for Estimating Preoperative Gastric Content and Volume. Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0b013e31820dee48
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.