The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Smoking and Perioperative Outcomes
Abstract
Background: Patients are often concerned about the effects of smoking on perioperative risk. However, effective advice may be limited by the paucity of information about smoking and perioperative risk. Thus, our goal was to determine the effect of smoking on 30-day postoperative outcomes in noncardiac surgical patients. Methods: We evaluated 635,265 patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database; 520,242 patients met our inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 103,795 were current smokers; 82,304 of the current smokers were propensity matched with 82,304 never-smoker controls. Matched current smokers and never-smokers were compared on major and minor composite morbidity outcomes and respective individual outcomes. Results: Current smokers were 1.38 (95% CI, 1.11-1.72) times more likely to die than never smokers. Current smokers also had significantly greater odds of pneumonia (odds ratio [OR], 2.09; 95% CI, 1.80-2.43), unplanned intubation (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.58-2.21), and mechanical ventilation (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.31-1.79). Current smokers were significantly more likely to experience a cardiac arrest (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.10-2.25), myocardial infarction (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.11-2.92), and stroke (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.18-2.53). Current smokers also had significantly higher odds of having superficial (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.20-1.42) and deep (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.21-1.68) incisional infections, sepsis (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.15-1.46), organ space infections (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.20-1.60), and septic shock (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.29-1.87). Conclusion: Our analysis indicates that smoking is associated with a higher likelihood of 30-day mortality and serious postoperative complications. Quantification of increased likelihood of 30-day mortality and a broad range of serious smoking-related complications may enhance the clinician's ability to motivate smoking cessation in surgical patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lindström, D., Azodi, O. S., Wladis, A., Tønnesen, H., Linder, S., Nåsell, H., Ponzer, S., & Adami, J. (2008) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181889d0d · Cited by 530
Wilson, K., Gibson, N., Willan, A., & Cook, D. (2000) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.160.7.939 · Cited by 415
Cited by
Postoperative pulmonary complications
Miskovic, A., & Lumb, A. B. (2017) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aex002 · Cited by 1,123
Sørensen, L. T. (2012) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.2012.5 · Cited by 645
Wong, J., Lam, D. P., Abrishami, A., Chan, M. T. V., & Chung, F. (2012) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie · doi:10.1007/s12630-011-9652-x · Cited by 409
De Hert, S., Staender, S., Fritsch, G., Hinkelbein, J., Afshari, A., Bettelli, G., Bock, M., Chew, M. S., Coburn, M., De Robertis, E., et al. (2018) · European Journal of Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1097/eja.0000000000000817 · Cited by 389
A review of enhanced recovery for thoracic anaesthesia and surgery
Jones, N. L., Edmonds, L., Ghosh, S., & Klein, A. A. (2013) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/anae.12067 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Turan, A., Mascha, E. J., Roberman, D., Turner, P. L., You, J., Kurz, A., Sessler, D. I., & Saager, L.
- Venue
- Anesthesiology
- Published
- 2011-04-01
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 837-846
- ISSN
- 0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1964464277
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Smoking and Perioperative Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/aln.0b013e318210f560
- The paper
- Turan, A., Mascha, E. J., Roberman, D., Turner, P. L., You, J., Kurz, A., Sessler, D. I., & Saager, L. (2011). Smoking and Perioperative Outcomes. Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0b013e318210f560
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.