Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 107Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyAnesthesia and Pain Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review of enhanced recovery for thoracic anaesthesia and surgery

Jones, N. L., Edmonds, L., Ghosh, S., Klein, A. A.·2013·Anaesthesia

Abstract

Summary: During the past decade, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of thoracic surgical procedures carried out in the UK . The current financial climate dictates that more efficient use of resources is necessary to meet escalating demands on healthcare. One potential means to achieve this is through the introduction of enhanced recovery protocols, designed to produce productivity savings by driving reduction in length of stay. These have been promoted by government bodies in a number of surgical specialties, including colorectal, gynaecological and orthopaedic surgery. This review focuses on aspects of peri‐operative care that might be incorporated into such a programme for thoracic anaesthesia, for which an enhanced recovery programme has not yet been introduced in the UK, and a review of the literature specific to this area of practice has not been published before. We performed a comprehensive search for published work relating to the peri‐operative management and optimisation of patients undergoing thoracic surgery, and divided these into appropriate areas of practice. We have reviewed the specific interventions that may be included in an enhanced recovery programme, including: pre‐optimisation; minimising fasting time; thrombo‐embolic prophylaxis; choice of anaesthetic and analgesic technique and surgical approach; postoperative rehabilitation; and chest drain management. Using the currently available evidence, the design and implementation of an enhanced recovery programme based on this review in selected patients as a package of care may reduce morbidity and length of hospital stay, thus maximising utilisation of available resources.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/anae.12067

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 84 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. NHS Modernisation Agency, 2003, National Good Practice Guidance on Pre‐assessment for In‐Patient Surgery
  2. Rasburn N, 2011, The first UK experience of an enhanced recovery program in thoracic surgery

Cited by

See all 107

Metadata

Authors
Jones, N. L., Edmonds, L., Ghosh, S., & Klein, A. A.
Affiliations
  • Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Cambridge UK
  • Royal Papworth Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Klein, A. A.
Venue
Anaesthesia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-11-05
Volume
68
Issue
2
Pages
179-189
ISSN
  • 0003-2409 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2044
OpenAlex
W2082981221
Cited by
107
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anaesthesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
enhanced recovery after surgery, thoracic surgery, thoracic anesthesia, perioperative care, preoperative optimization, preoperative fasting, thromboprophylaxis, anesthetic techniques, analgesia, surgical approach, postoperative rehabilitation, chest drain management, length of hospital stay, health care utilization
MeSH terms
Anesthesia, Anesthesia Recovery Period, United Kingdom, Humans, Length of Stay, Thoracic Surgical Procedures, Perioperative Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of enhanced recovery for thoracic anaesthesia and surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/anae.12067
The paper
Jones, N. L., Edmonds, L., Ghosh, S., & Klein, A. A. (2013). A review of enhanced recovery for thoracic anaesthesia and surgery. Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12067

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.