The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Increase in Prescription Opioid Use During Pregnancy Among Medicaid-Enrolled Women
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To report the prevalence of prescription opioid use and evaluate the trends in a large cohort of Medicaid-enrolled pregnant women. METHODS: A cohort of pregnancies was identified using data from the Medicaid Analytical eXtract for the period of 2000-2007. Dispensing of opioids, as a class and separately for individual agents, was evaluated using claims from filled prescriptions. Variations in patterns of prescription opioid fills were examined by demographic characteristics, by geographic region, and over time. Median number of opioid prescriptions dispensed and cumulative days of availability for prescription opioids during pregnancy were reported. RESULTS: The study population consisted of more than 1.1 million women with completed pregnancies from 46 U.S. states and Washington, DC. One of five women from our cohort (21.6%) filled a prescription for an opioid during pregnancy; this proportion increased from 18.5% in 2000 to 22.8% in 2007. Substantial regional variation was seen with the proportion of women who filled a prescription during pregnancy, ranging between 9.5% and 41.6% across the states. Codeine and hydrocodone were the most commonly prescribed opioids. Among women filling at least one opioid prescription, the median (interquartile range) number of prescriptions filled was 1 (1-2) and the median (interquartile range) cumulative days of opioid availability during pregnancy were 5 (3-13) days. CONCLUSION: We observed high and increasing number of filled prescriptions for opioids during pregnancy among Medicaid-enrolled women. These findings call for further safety evaluations of these drugs and their effects on the developing fetus to inform clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Patrick, S. W., Davis, M. M., Lehmann, C. U., & Cooper, W. O. (2015) · Journal of Perinatology · doi:10.1038/jp.2015.36 · Cited by 629
Prevention and Treatment of Opioid Misuse and Addiction: A Review
Volkow, N. D., Jones, E. B., Einstein, E. B., & Wargo, E. M. (2019) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3126 · Cited by 596
Increasing Incidence of the Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome in U.S. Neonatal ICUs
Tolia, V. N., Patrick, S. W., Bennett, M. M., Murthy, K., Sousa, J., Smith, P. B., Clark, R. H., & Spitzer, A. R. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1500439 · Cited by 434
Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome
Patrick, S. W., Barfield, W. D., Poindexter, B. B., COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN, C. O. S. U. A. P., Cummings, J., Hand, I., Adams-Chapman, I., Aucott, S. W., Puopolo, K. M., Goldsmith, J. P., et al. (2020) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2020-029074 · Cited by 363
The Opioid Crisis: a Comprehensive Overview
Vadivelu, N., Kai, A. M., Kodumudi, V., Sramcik, J., & Kaye, A. D. (2018) · Current Pain and Headache Reports · doi:10.1007/s11916-018-0670-z · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Desai, R. J., Hernandez-Diaz, S., Bateman, B. T., & Huybrechts, K. F.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 997-1002
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080994807
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increase in Prescription Opioid Use During Pregnancy Among Medicaid-Enrolled Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/aog.0000000000000208
- The paper
- Desai, R. J., Hernandez-Diaz, S., Bateman, B. T., & Huybrechts, K. F. (2014). Increase in Prescription Opioid Use During Pregnancy Among Medicaid-Enrolled Women. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000000208
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.