Cited by 137Maternal and fetal healthcareGlobal Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Facility-Based Identification of Women With Severe Maternal Morbidity: It Is Time to Start

Open access
Callaghan, William M., Grobman, William A., Kilpatrick, Sarah J., Main, Elliott K., D'Alton, Mary·2014·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

In Brief Although maternal deaths have been the traditional indicator of maternal health, these events are the “tip of the iceberg” in that there are many women who have significant complications of pregnancy, labor, and delivery. Identifying women who experience severe maternal morbidity and reviewing their care can provide critical information to inform quality improvement in obstetrics. In this commentary, we review methods to identify women who experienced severe complications of pregnancy. We propose a simple validated approach based on transfusion of four or more units of blood products, admission to an intensive care unit, or both as a starting point for identification and review of severe maternal morbidity in health care settings for the purpose of understanding successes and failures in systems of care. Facility-based identification of women with severe maternal morbidity and review of their care can further efforts to improve the quality of obstetric care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0000000000000218

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Callaghan, W. M., Grobman, W. A., Kilpatrick, S. J., Main, E. K., & D'Alton, M.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2014-05
Volume
123
Issue
5
Pages
978-981
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060359125
Cited by
137
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 4
FWCI
14.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
severe maternal morbidity, obstetric quality improvement, maternal mortality, blood transfusion, intensive care unit admission, case review, systems of care, pregnancy complications
MeSH terms
Blood Transfusion, Critical Care, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Severity of Illness Index, Quality Indicators, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review