The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Association of Copy Number Variants With Specific Ultrasonographically Detected Fetal Anomalies
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of other-than-common benign copy number variants with specific fetal abnormalities detected by ultrasonogram. METHODS: Fetuses with structural anomalies were compared with fetuses without detected abnormalities for the frequency of other-than-common benign copy number variants. This is a secondary analysis from the previously published National Institute of Child Health and Human Development microarray trial. Ultrasound reports were reviewed and details of structural anomalies were entered into a nonhierarchical web-based database. The frequency of other-than-common benign copy number variants (ie, either pathogenic or variants of uncertain significance) not detected by karyotype was calculated for each anomaly in isolation and in the presence of other anomalies and compared with the frequency in fetuses without detected abnormalities. RESULTS: Of 1,082 fetuses with anomalies detected on ultrasound scan, 752 had a normal karyotype. Other-than-common benign copy number variants were present in 61 (8.1%) of these euploid fetuses. Fetuses with anomalies in more than one system had a 13.0% frequency of other-than-common benign copy number variants, which was significantly higher (P<.001) than the frequency (3.6%) in fetuses without anomalies (n=1,966). Specific organ systems in which isolated anomalies were nominally significantly associated with other-than-common benign copy number variants were the renal (P=.036) and cardiac systems (P=.012) but did not meet significance after the adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: When a fetal anomaly is detected on ultrasonogram, chromosomal microarray offers additional information over karyotype, the degree of which depends on the organ system involved. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: : II.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis
Wapner, R. J., Martin, C. L., Levy, B., Ballif, B. C., Eng, C. M., Zachary, J. M., Savage, M., Platt, L. D., Saltzman, D., Grobman, W. A., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1203382 · Cited by 1,412
Self-citation
Cited by
Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis
Levy, B., & Wapner, R. (2018) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.005 · Cited by 341
Self-citationBenn, P., Borrell, A., Chiu, R. W. K., Cuckle, H., Dugoff, L., Faas, B., Gross, S., Huang, T., Johnson, J., Maymon, R., et al. (2015) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.4608 · Cited by 292
First and second trimester screening for fetal structural anomalies
Edwards, L., & Hui, L. (2018) · Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.siny.2017.11.005 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Donnelly, J. C., Platt, L. D., Rebarber, A., Zachary, J., Grobman, W. A., & Wapner, R. J.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-90
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1997175998
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association of Copy Number Variants With Specific Ultrasonographically Detected Fetal Anomalies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/aog.0000000000000336
- The paper
- Donnelly, J. C., Platt, L. D., Rebarber, A., Zachary, J., Grobman, W. A., & Wapner, R. J. (2014). Association of Copy Number Variants With Specific Ultrasonographically Detected Fetal Anomalies. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000000336
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.