Cited by 179Prenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersCongenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery

First and second trimester screening for fetal structural anomalies

Edwards, Lindsay, Hui, Lisa·2018·Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Abstract

Fetal structural anomalies are found in up to 3% of all pregnancies and ultrasound-based screening has been an integral part of routine prenatal care for decades. The prenatal detection of fetal anomalies allows for optimal perinatal management, providing expectant parents with opportunities for additional imaging, genetic testing, and the provision of information regarding prognosis and management options. Approximately one-half of all major structural anomalies can now be detected in the first trimester, including acrania/anencephaly, abdominal wall defects, holoprosencephaly and cystic hygromata. Due to the ongoing development of some organ systems however, some anomalies will not be evident until later in the pregnancy. To this extent, the second trimester anatomy is recommended by professional societies as the standard investigation for the detection of fetal structural anomalies. The reported detection rates of structural anomalies vary according to the organ system being examined, and are also dependent upon factors such as the equipment settings and sonographer experience. Technological advances over the past two decades continue to support the role of ultrasound as the primary imaging modality in pregnancy, and the safety of ultrasound for the developing fetus is well established. With increasing capabilities and experience, detailed examination of the central nervous system and cardiovascular system is possible, with dedicated examinations such as the fetal neurosonogram and the fetal echocardiogram now widely performed in tertiary centers. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is well recognized for its role in the assessment of fetal brain anomalies; other potential indications for fetal MRI include lung volume measurement (in cases of congenital diaphragmatic hernia), and pre-surgical planning prior to fetal spina bifida repair. When a major structural abnormality is detected prenatally, genetic testing with chromosomal microarray is recommended over routine karyotype due to its higher genomic resolution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.siny.2017.11.005

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Edwards, L., & Hui, L.
Affiliations
  • Royal Hobart Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Hui, Lisa
Venue
Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
102-111
ISSN
1744-165X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2772189056
Cited by
179
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery
Keywords
fetal structural anomalies, prenatal ultrasound screening, first-trimester screening, anencephaly, acrania, abdominal wall defect, holoprosencephaly, cystic lymphangioma, fetal neurosonography, fetal echocardiography, fetal MRI, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, spina bifida, chromosomal microarray analysis, prenatal diagnosis
MeSH terms
Congenital Abnormalities, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Prenatal Diagnosis, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Nuchal Translucency Measurement, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review