Cited by 32Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchUrinary Tract Infections Management

Self-Removal of a Urinary Catheter After Urogynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Shatkin-Margolis, Abigail, Yook, Eunsun, Hill, Austin M., Crisp, Catrina C., Yeung, Jennifer, Kleeman, Steven, Pauls, Rachel N.·2019·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether self-discontinuation of a transurethral catheter is noninferior to office discontinuation in patients requiring indwelling catheterization for postoperative urinary retention after pelvic reconstructive surgery. METHODS: In this randomized noninferiority trial, patients with postoperative urinary retention after pelvic reconstructive surgery were assigned to self-discontinuation or office discontinuation of their catheter 1 week after surgery. The primary outcome was a noninferiority comparison of postoperative urinary retention at 1 week. Self-discontinuation patients were instructed on home catheter removal on postoperative day 7. Office discontinuation patients underwent a standard voiding trial on postoperative day 6–8. Postoperative urinary retention at 1 week was defined as continued catheterization on postoperative day 6–8. Secondary outcomes included urinary tract infections (UTI), residual volume at 2 weeks, duration of catheter use, recurrent postoperative urinary retention, number of patient encounters, and visual analog scales (VAS) regarding patient experience. Given a known incidence of postoperative urinary retention at 1 week (16%) and 15% noninferiority margin, a sample size of 74 per group (n=148) was planned. RESULTS: From January 2017 through March 2019, 217 women were screened and 157 were analyzed: 78 self-discontinuation and 79 office discontinuation. Demographic characteristics and surgeries performed were similar. Eleven patients in each group experienced postoperative urinary retention at 1 week (14.1% self-discontinuation vs 13.9% office discontinuation, P=.97), establishing noninferiority (difference 0.2%, 95% CI: −1.00, 0.10). There were significantly fewer patient encounters with self-discontinuation (42/78, 53.8% vs 79/79, 100%). Self-discontinuation patients demonstrated better VAS scores regarding pain, ease, disruption, and likelihood to use the same method again (all P<.05). Though the rate of UTI was high, there was no difference between groups (59.0% self-discontinuation vs 66.7% office discontinuation, P=.32). Residual volume at 2 weeks, recurrent postoperative urinary retention, and duration of catheter use were also similar. CONCLUSION: Self-discontinuation of a transurethral catheter was noninferior to office-based discontinuation in the setting of postoperative urinary retention after pelvic reconstructive surgery. Self-discontinuation resulted in fewer patient encounters and improved patient experience. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02996968.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0000000000003531

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Four trials with a total of 582 women evaluated POP surgery and management of catheters once trial of void (TOV) fails.

    “POP surgery and management of catheters once trial of void (TOV) fails: four trials with a total of 582 women (Boyd 2019; Hakvoort 2011; Shatkin‐Margolis 2019; Weemhoff 2010).”

    From Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery (2025) · cites this paper as Shatkin‐Margolis 2019

  • In Shatkin‐Margolis 2019, the risk of attrition bias from incomplete outcome data was low.

    “Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk One participant lost to follow‐up”

    From Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery (2025) · cites this paper as Shatkin‐Margolis 2019

  • In Shatkin‐Margolis 2019, the risk of selection bias from allocation concealment was unclear.

    “Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No statement on allocation”

    From Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery (2025) · cites this paper as Shatkin‐Margolis 2019

  • In Shatkin‐Margolis 2019, the risk of other bias was low.

    “Other bias Low risk Funded by TriHealth Research Foundation”

    From Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery (2025) · cites this paper as Shatkin‐Margolis 2019

  • In Shatkin‐Margolis 2019, a power calculation was performed.

    “Power calculation: 148 trialists allowed 15% non‐inferiority margin and rate of failed TOV 16% (if upper limit of 95% CI was less than predetermined margin, non‐inferiority declared)”

    From Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery (2025) · cites this paper as Shatkin‐Margolis 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shatkin-Margolis, A., Yook, E., Hill, A. M., Crisp, C. C., Yeung, J., Kleeman, S., & Pauls, R. N.
Affiliations
Good Samaritan Hospital (US)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2019-11
Volume
134
Issue
5
Pages
1027-1036
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2979960286
Cited by
32
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Urinary Tract Infections Management
Keywords
postoperative urinary retention, pelvic reconstruction, urogynecologic surgery, transurethral catheter, urinary tract infection, patient experience, non-inferiority, voiding trial, residual urine, patient encounters, shared decision-making
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Recurrence, Self Care, Urinary Catheterization, Urinary Retention, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Device Removal, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review