Cited by 804Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsAnesthesia and Pain ManagementPreterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis

Contemporary Patterns of Spontaneous Labor With Normal Neonatal Outcomes

Open access
Zhang, Jun, Landy, Helain J., Ware Branch, D., Burkman, Ronald, Haberman, Shoshana, Gregory, Kimberly D., Hatjis, Christos G., Ramirez, Mildred M., Bailit, Jennifer L., Gonzalez-Quintero, Victor H., Hibbard, Judith U., Hoffman, Matthew K., Kominiarek, Michelle, Learman, Lee A., Van Veldhuisen, Paul, Troendle, James, Reddy, Uma M.·2010·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To use contemporary labor data to examine the labor patterns in a large, modern obstetric population in the United States. METHODS: Data were from the Consortium on Safe Labor, a multicenter retrospective study that abstracted detailed labor and delivery information from electronic medical records in 19 hospitals across the United States. A total of 62,415 parturients were selected who had a singleton term gestation, spontaneous onset of labor, vertex presentation, vaginal delivery, and a normal perinatal outcome. A repeated-measures analysis was used to construct average labor curves by parity. An interval-censored regression was used to estimate duration of labor, stratified by cervical dilation at admission and centimeter by centimeter. RESULTS: Labor may take more than 6 hours to progress from 4 to 5 cm and more than 3 hours to progress from 5 to 6 cm of dilation. Nulliparous and multiparous women appeared to progress at a similar pace before 6 cm. However, after 6 cm, labor accelerated much faster in multiparous than in nulliparous women. The 95 percentiles of the second stage of labor in nulliparous women with and without epidural analgesia were 3.6 and 2.8 hours, respectively. A partogram for nulliparous women is proposed. CONCLUSION: In a large, contemporary population, the rate of cervical dilation accelerated after 6 cm, and progress from 4 cm to 6 cm was far slower than previously described. Allowing labor to continue for a longer period before 6 cm of cervical dilation may reduce the rate of intrapartum and subsequent repeat cesarean deliveries in the United States.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0b013e3181fdef6e

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [1]Friedman EA The graphic analysis of labor Am J Obstet Gynecol 1954 68 1568 75 13207246
  2. [2]Friedman EA Primigravid labor: a graphicostatistical analysis Obstet Gynecol 1955 6 567 89 12576240
  3. [4]Zhang J Troendle J Yancey MK Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002 187 824 8 12388957
  4. [5]Zhang J Troendle J Reddy U Laughon SK Branch DW Burkman R Landy HJ Hibbard JU Haberman S Ramirez MM Bailit JL Hoffman MK Gregory KD Gonzalez-Quintero VH Kominiarek M Learman LA Hatjis CG Van Veldhuisen P Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States Am J Obstet Gynecol (in press) PMC2947574 20708166
  5. [7]Klein JP Moeschberger ML Survival Analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data Berlin Springer 1997
  6. [8]Vahratian A Troendle JF Siega-Riz AM Zhang J Methodological challenges in studying labor progression Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2006 20 72 8 16420344
  7. [9]Albers LL Schiff M Gorwoda JG The length of active labor in normal pregnancies Obstet Gynecol 1996 87 355 9 8598954
  8. [10]Rouse DJ Owen J Hauth JC Criteria for failed labor induction: prospective evaluation of a standardized protocol Obstet Gynecol 2000 96 671 7 11042299
  9. [11]Lin MG Rouse DJ What is a failed labor induction? Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006 49 585 93 20 16885665
  10. [12]Peisner DB Rosen MG Transition from latent to active labor Obstet Gynecol 1986 68 448 51 3748488
  11. [13]Philpott RH Castle WM Cervicographs in the management of labour in primigravidae I: the alter line for detecting abnormal labour J Obstet Gynaecol Br Common 1972 79 592 8 5043422
  12. [14]Philpott RH Castle WM Cervicographs in the management of labour in primigravidae II: the action line and treatment of abnormal labour J Obstet Gynaecol Br Common 1972 79 599 602 5043423
  13. [15]World Health Organization World Health Organization partograph in management of labour Lancet 1994 343 8910 1399 1404 7910888
  14. [16]Dujardin B De Schampheleire I Sene H Ndiaye F Value of the alert and action lines on the partgram Lancet 1992 339 1336 8 1350000
  15. [17]Lavender T Hart A Smyth RMD Effect of partogram use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labor at term Cochroane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008 4 Art.No.:CD 005461 18843690
  16. [18]Zhang J Troendle J Mikolajczyk R Sundaram R Beaver J Fraser W The natural history of the normal 1st stage of labor Obstet Gynecol 2010 115 705 10 20308828

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, J., Landy, H. J., Ware Branch, D., Burkman, R., Haberman, S., Gregory, K. D., Hatjis, C. G., Ramirez, M. M., Bailit, J. L., Gonzalez-Quintero, V. H., Hibbard, J. U., Hoffman, M. K., Kominiarek, M., Learman, L. A., Van Veldhuisen, P., Troendle, J., & Reddy, U. M.
Affiliations
Intermountain Healthcare (US)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2010-12
Volume
116
Issue
6
Pages
1281-1287
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118727855
Cited by
804
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 114 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 24
FWCI
24.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (HHSN267200603425C)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN267200603425C)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Keywords
spontaneous labor, labor duration, cervical dilatation, nulliparous women, multiparous women, parity, partograph, epidural analgesia, second stage of labor, intrapartum care, repeat cesarean section
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Labor, Obstetric, Labor Stage, First, Labor Stage, Second, Parity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Reference Values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review