Contemporary Patterns of Spontaneous Labor With Normal Neonatal Outcomes
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To use contemporary labor data to examine the labor patterns in a large, modern obstetric population in the United States. METHODS: Data were from the Consortium on Safe Labor, a multicenter retrospective study that abstracted detailed labor and delivery information from electronic medical records in 19 hospitals across the United States. A total of 62,415 parturients were selected who had a singleton term gestation, spontaneous onset of labor, vertex presentation, vaginal delivery, and a normal perinatal outcome. A repeated-measures analysis was used to construct average labor curves by parity. An interval-censored regression was used to estimate duration of labor, stratified by cervical dilation at admission and centimeter by centimeter. RESULTS: Labor may take more than 6 hours to progress from 4 to 5 cm and more than 3 hours to progress from 5 to 6 cm of dilation. Nulliparous and multiparous women appeared to progress at a similar pace before 6 cm. However, after 6 cm, labor accelerated much faster in multiparous than in nulliparous women. The 95 percentiles of the second stage of labor in nulliparous women with and without epidural analgesia were 3.6 and 2.8 hours, respectively. A partogram for nulliparous women is proposed. CONCLUSION: In a large, contemporary population, the rate of cervical dilation accelerated after 6 cm, and progress from 4 cm to 6 cm was far slower than previously described. Allowing labor to continue for a longer period before 6 cm of cervical dilation may reduce the rate of intrapartum and subsequent repeat cesarean deliveries in the United States.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Labor progresses at a rate that is slower than what we had thought previously.
“The authors revisited the definition of labor dystocia in light of the fact that labor progresses at a rate that is slower than what we had thought previously.”
From Safe Prevention of the Primary Cesarean Delivery: ACOG and SMFM Change the Game (2014) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- [1]Friedman EA The graphic analysis of labor Am J Obstet Gynecol 1954 68 1568 75 13207246
- [2]Friedman EA Primigravid labor: a graphicostatistical analysis Obstet Gynecol 1955 6 567 89 12576240
- [4]Zhang J Troendle J Yancey MK Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002 187 824 8 12388957
- [5]Zhang J Troendle J Reddy U Laughon SK Branch DW Burkman R Landy HJ Hibbard JU Haberman S Ramirez MM Bailit JL Hoffman MK Gregory KD Gonzalez-Quintero VH Kominiarek M Learman LA Hatjis CG Van Veldhuisen P Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States Am J Obstet Gynecol (in press) PMC2947574 20708166
- [7]Klein JP Moeschberger ML Survival Analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data Berlin Springer 1997
- [8]Vahratian A Troendle JF Siega-Riz AM Zhang J Methodological challenges in studying labor progression Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2006 20 72 8 16420344
- [9]Albers LL Schiff M Gorwoda JG The length of active labor in normal pregnancies Obstet Gynecol 1996 87 355 9 8598954
- [10]Rouse DJ Owen J Hauth JC Criteria for failed labor induction: prospective evaluation of a standardized protocol Obstet Gynecol 2000 96 671 7 11042299
- [11]Lin MG Rouse DJ What is a failed labor induction? Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006 49 585 93 20 16885665
- [12]Peisner DB Rosen MG Transition from latent to active labor Obstet Gynecol 1986 68 448 51 3748488
- [13]Philpott RH Castle WM Cervicographs in the management of labour in primigravidae I: the alter line for detecting abnormal labour J Obstet Gynaecol Br Common 1972 79 592 8 5043422
- [14]Philpott RH Castle WM Cervicographs in the management of labour in primigravidae II: the action line and treatment of abnormal labour J Obstet Gynaecol Br Common 1972 79 599 602 5043423
- [15]World Health Organization World Health Organization partograph in management of labour Lancet 1994 343 8910 1399 1404 7910888
- [16]Dujardin B De Schampheleire I Sene H Ndiaye F Value of the alert and action lines on the partgram Lancet 1992 339 1336 8 1350000
- [17]Lavender T Hart A Smyth RMD Effect of partogram use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labor at term Cochroane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008 4 Art.No.:CD 005461 18843690
- [18]Zhang J Troendle J Mikolajczyk R Sundaram R Beaver J Fraser W The natural history of the normal 1st stage of labor Obstet Gynecol 2010 115 705 10 20308828
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort
Laughon, S. K., Zhang, J., Grewal, J., Sundaram, R., Beaver, J., & Reddy, U. M. (2012) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.014 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Self-citationACOG Clinical Practice Guideline No. 8: First and Second Stage Labor Management
ACOG Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines–Obstetrics (2024) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000005447 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Maternal body mass index and duration of labor
Carlhäll, S., Källén, K., & Blomberg, M. (2013) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.08.021 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Placenta previa: an outcome-based cohort study in a contemporary obstetric population
Lal, A. K., & Hibbard, J. U. (2015) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-015-3628-y · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citationBai, J., Sun, Z., Yu, S., Lu, Y., Long, S., Wang, H., Qiu, R., Ou, Z., Zhou, M., Zhi, D., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2022.940150 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Safe Prevention of the Primary Cesarean Delivery: ACOG and SMFM Change the Game
Lothian, J. A. (2014) · The Journal of Perinatal Education · doi:10.1891/1058-1243.23.3.115 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, J., Landy, H. J., Ware Branch, D., Burkman, R., Haberman, S., Gregory, K. D., Hatjis, C. G., Ramirez, M. M., Bailit, J. L., Gonzalez-Quintero, V. H., Hibbard, J. U., Hoffman, M. K., Kominiarek, M., Learman, L. A., Van Veldhuisen, P., Troendle, J., & Reddy, U. M.
- Affiliations
- Intermountain Healthcare (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1281-1287
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3660040
- OpenAlex
- W2118727855
- Cited by
- 804
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 114 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 24.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (HHSN267200603425C)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN267200603425C)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
- Keywords
- spontaneous labor, labor duration, cervical dilatation, nulliparous women, multiparous women, parity, partograph, epidural analgesia, second stage of labor, intrapartum care, repeat cesarean section
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Labor, Obstetric, Labor Stage, First, Labor Stage, Second, Parity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Reference Values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review